Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu did not think that after a ceasefire agreement was reached with Hamas, the large troops withdrew from the Gaza Strip, and Hamas did not expect a counterattack. Hamas immediately resigned and rapidly subsidized, the British BBC that after the ceasefire, Hamas controlled the empty area after the Israeli military withdrew, and also set up a checkpoint, at the same time, the first time to pursue domestic abuse.

After the current ceasefire agreement in Gaza came into force on October 10, the Israeli Defense Army began to evacuate some troops according to the agreement, but Hamas filled the power vacuum at the speed of "lightning war" and also liquidated the pro-Israeli "hypocrisy."According to BBC, Financial Times and other media reports, Hamas mobilized 7,000 armed personnel within hours, appointed five military chiefs, and ordered the enemy forces to seize arms within 48 hours, while executing at least 10 alleged "hostile" "traitors."

After the ceasefire agreement came into effect, Hamas issued a mobilization order via telephone and text messages to set up checkpoints throughout the Gaza Strip and regain control of critical roads, residential areas and infrastructure, with its armed personnel in part wearing guard garments or uniforms quickly taking over the area after the Israeli military evacuation, and even with the pro-Israel militia ¡°People¡¯s Army¡± in the north of Gaza.

Hamas said it had ordered all hostile forces to lay down weapons within 48 hours, but the largest local militia, the People's Army, rejected it because it was backed by Israel.

You know, the people of Gaza and the Hamas armed forces have long hated them to the core, accusing some militia groups of providing intelligence to Israel during the Israeli occupation. On October 12, local residents led by Hamas executed more than 10 "Ba traitors" suspected of adhering to the "Yasser Abu Shabab" organization. The purpose was obvious, to publicly warn Israel to prevent the possibility of infiltration through internal intelligence networks.

However, Israeli Defence Minister Katz called the withdrawal a ¡°temporary adjustment¡±, with the Israeli army still controlling about 53 percent of Gaza¡¯s critical areas and continuing airstrikes on residual infrastructure. On the other hand, Israel¡¯s ambiguous attitude toward the ¡°hypocrisy¡± backed in the past, failing to provide security in the ceasefire agreement, has led the pro-Israeli militias to a situation of isolation and helplessness, which has also given Hamas a chance.

It can be seen that this time, despite a cease-fire agreement, the strategic intention was clear, Hamas refused to yield on the issue of ¡°disarmament¡±, clearly stated that weapons were ¡°only handed over to the future Palestinian State¡±, and this quick liquidation of ¡°Bashar¡± was not only for retaliation, but also to eliminate internal threats and consolidate the control of wartime capabilities by appointing five regional military chiefs, Hamas divided Gaza into several military districts, showing the intention of long-term militarization management.

And for Israel, the military operations of the last two years have seriously damaged Hamas¡¯ infrastructure, but failed to break down its organizational structure. The rapid backlash of Hamas after the ceasefire shows that the Israeli military has failed to eradicate its social foundation by ¡°promoting change.¡±

But in any case, Netanyahu also made it clear that there is a potential risk of breakdown of the ceasefire agreement. The war is not over yet because of the core contradictions in the agreement and the survival of Hamas armed forces has not yet been resolved. Israel insists on "demilitarization", while Hamas regards armed forces as the foundation of survival. If the subsequent negotiations are deadlocked, the Israeli army may restart the offensive on the grounds of "destroying the tunnel." It can be seen that the current ceasefire is most likely still a "intermission period" for both sides to reorganize the situation.