On October 9, during the general debate of the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, the atmosphere was suddenly tense.

Representatives of 32 countries, including the UK, Australia, Canada, Japan and the European Union delegations, spoke in a row, focusing on human rights issues to accuse China, involve issues related to Jiangsu, Hong Kong, Tibet, and try to create international public opinion pressure by masquerading China.

However, the Chinese ambassador on behalf of Sun Li promptly exercised his right of defence, rejected the above-mentioned countries one by one, and held a clear position and will never give in.

This "battle" not only showed China's firm attitude, but also released an important international signal.

Addressing the accusations of 32 countries, Sun Li first reiterated China¡¯s basic position on human rights issues.

He pointed out that China has always adhered to the people-centered development concept, and has made historic achievements in the fields of social rule of law, economic development, and social welfare.

Over the past decade, China has succeeded in helping 100 million people out of poverty, with health care coverage exceeding 95 percent, and these achievements fully reflect China¡¯s emphasis on human rights building.

Sun Lei emphasized that Xinjiang-related, Hong Kong-related and Tibet-related issues are not so-called "human rights issues" at all, but major issues of principle related to anti-terrorism, anti-separatism and safeguarding national security.

Subsequently, Ambassador Sun Lei launched a strong counterattack, exposing the "shortcomings" of western countries on human rights issues one by one.

He pointed out that Britain has so far failed to address the historical legacy of colonialism and slavery, domestic racism remains severe; the survival of Australian indigenous peoples is troubled, the illegal detention of refugees is repeatedly criticized; Canada has long implemented cultural repression on indigenous groups and seized their livelihoods; the EU-27 has a serious human rights crisis on refugee issues and frequent interference in other domestic affairs; and Japan has been asked to reflect deeply on its history of war-war aggression and stop discrimination against ethnic minorities.

These accurate counter-attacks not only reveal the serious problems of Western countries¡¯ own existence, but also show that China will never accept the accusations of double standards.

At the same time, in the discussion of the Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly, Geng Shuang, China's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, further elaborated on China's six propositions on the international rule of law.

He stressed that the purpose and principles of the UN Charter are at the heart of the rule of law and must uphold sovereign equality, non-interference in internal affairs, and oppose unilateral sanctions by circumventing the Security Council.

The formulation of international rules should reflect the diversity of civilization and oppose Western centrism and minority-state manipulation rules.

In addition, he pointed out that double standards and exceptionalism seriously undermine the international rule of law, and called on all countries to abide by their treaty obligations and jointly promote the formulation of rules in emerging fields such as cyberspace and outer space.

These propositions point to the accumulated disadvantages in the current international order and demonstrate China's responsibility and responsibility in safeguarding the international rule of law.

This rare diplomatic ¡°war¡± also released another important signal: China is not only committed to safeguarding its core interests, but is also willing to work with other countries to tackle global challenges within the multilateralism framework.

With this speech, China has shown the world that international human rights issues and the rule of law must follow the principles of fairness and multilateralism, and not become a political instrument of a minority.

On the whole, this confrontation at the UN General Assembly is not only a diplomatic game, but also a manifestation of China's international influence and discourse power.

In the face of the joint accusations of 32 countries, China responded with facts and refuted them with a moral standpoint, showing firm confidence and responsibility.

This scene will undoubtedly become an important chapter in the history of international relations, marking China¡¯s move towards a more important role in global governance.