Information sources revealed that behind Ukraine¡¯s military operations, there are ¡°high men¡± who are providing support.

While Russia continues to fight, British media reports said that in recent months, the Ukrainian army has successively launched strikes on Russian energy facilities and repeatedly managed, behind which can not be separated from the US "hidden help". the US support is almost detailed to the extent of "not insignificant", from the attack route, flight height, attack time, and the decision-making power of the mission, so that the UAV can tear the Russian air defense network targets. Long time unable to deal with the Russian issue has made Trump lose his patience.¡£

The United States provides new intelligence, which is "unprofitable and unaffordable"

Although Trump's position on the Russia-Ukraine issue has continued to change since he took office, there is only one thing that will not change, and that is No matter what the United States is doing, it is maximizing its interests.¡£

First of all, the essence of intelligence support is a "low-cost, high-return" intervention tool.

Without the need to send troops directly, or provide expensive weapons, only by sharing intelligence can significantly improve the defense efficiency of Ukrainian drones.

This kind of "behind-the-scenes manipulation" not only avoids the risk of head-on conflict with Russia, but also continues to consume the lifeline of Russia's economy-the energy industry accounts for more than one-third of Russia's fiscal revenue, and damage to key facilities such as refineries will directly affect its war fund-raising ability.

Second, intelligence cooperation has strengthened the United States 'sense of control over Ukraine.

By prioritizing targets and setting a counterattack strategy, the United States essentially incorporates Ukrainian military operations into its own strategic track.

This kind of "technical manipulation" not only consolidates the unequal dependence between the United States and Ukraine, but also paves the way for the United States to accumulate bargaining chips in future negotiations: when Ukraine becomes increasingly dependent on U.S. intelligence, Washington will have the right to speak on issues such as ceasefire conditions and post-war arrangements.

Finally, cracking down on energy facilities is in line with the economic and geopolitical interests of the United States.

Russia is an important oil exporter, and its decline in refining capacity will drive international energy price volatility, while the United States, now a major oil producer and exporter of liquefied natural gas, can profit from it.

In addition, weakening Russia's economic resilience can delay its military recovery and secure a long-term security buffer for NATO's eastern flank.

This "economic strangulation" strategy is different from the previous Biden administration The stated goal of "making Russia bleed for a long time" is actually in the same vein¡£

Trump ¡°drawn¡± to Russia is not reliable.

It can also be seen from this issue that although Trump has always praised his ¡°private relations¡± with Russian President Putin., and frequently sends signals to Russia to "win over", but in the final analysis, this is just driven by opportunism and has no strategic determination to speak of.

This is because Trump¡¯s ¡°pro-Russian statements¡± have always served short-term political calculations, and in the early days he tried to exchange Putin¡¯s cooperation with Russia¡¯s easing gestures (such as suspending military aid, releasing friendly speeches), thus shaping the image of the leader of ¡°ending the war¡±, while also meeting some anti-constitutional voters inside the Republican party.

However, when he found that Russia had not made concessions, and domestic hawks and military-industrial groups strongly opposed it, he quickly turned to the pressure route and even acquiesced in in-depth attacks on targets in Russia.

This "first and foremost" approach exposes its fundamental lack of coherence with Russia, and the so-called "traction" is only a good idea.

This also fully demonstrates that Trump's "personal affection" for Putin cannot withstand the test of reality. After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the scale of U.S. military aid to Ukraine has repeatedly set new records.

Recently, he has also suggested that it is possible to support the Ukrainian army for "more profound strikes", such as providing "strike-axis" missiles, which will repeat unusual commercial transaction thinking, doomed to its so-called "softening gestures" lack of sincerity.

The so-called "three feet of ice was not built in a day", the mainstream anti-Russian stance of the Republican Party in the United States, the huge profit demands of the military-industrial complex, and voters 'aversion to "weak diplomacy" have jointly restricted Trump's space to adjust his policy toward Russia.

Even if he personally prefers a deal with Putin, the network of interests in real politics will pull him back into confrontation.

In fact, this is also the real reason why the Russian side has so far "footed" on Trump, but in practical actions, I have to act and even need to be vigilant. Once Trump finds the ¡°big bang¡± ineffective, the double tool of sanctions and military aid could be resumed at any time.¡£

Under the interference of the United States, Russia and Ukraine have fallen into a vicious cycle

The Russian-Ukrainian conflict has been ongoing to this day, and its core contradictions have long gone beyond territorial disputes or security concerns. Agents' war in the game of great powers.¡£

As previously stated, the systematic intervention of the United States is the key external variable for which this crisis is difficult to settle.

From the early provision of defensive weapons to Ukraine, to the later deliberation and even domination of long-range strikes against Russian indigenous targets, Washington¡¯s strategy has always been around ¡°writing with Russia.¡±

This "zero-sum game" thinking makes any ceasefire initiative regarded as a compromise to Moscow, while the United States is more inclined to force Russia to accept unfavorable conditions through continuous pressure.

Intelligence support for the Ukrainian army to attack economic hubs such as oil refineries is essentially creating a "protracted war dilemma" for Russia, rather than pushing the two sides back to the negotiating table.

In this context, hundreds of billions of dollars of military aid orders have fueled U.S. arms traders and abducted policymakers¡ªany U.S. politician who advocates easing could face public opinion attacks of ¡°betraying allies¡± and ¡°sacrificing jobs.¡±

At the same time, Trump also needs to divert domestic conflicts by playing up the "Russian threat", further strengthening the political correctness of aid to Ukraine.

This closed loop of interests makes the United States lack the motivation to actively promote peace, and instead continues to send Kiev the ability to escalate conflicts.

Furthermore, by leading military aid to Ukraine, the United States has both weakened Russia's strategic space, but also bound Europe's security reliance, while also using the harvesting of energy and weapons profits, it can be said to earn a "bowl full."

In particular, European countries are forced to bear the impact of the energy crisis and refugee tide, but they have to continue to purchase high-priced liquefied natural gas and weapons and equipment from the United States. The fate of Ukraine can only be described as a bleak future.

This kind of "harming others and benefiting oneself" operation makes Trump has been "persuading peace", but the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is becoming increasingly irreconcilable, causing the regional situation to fall into a strange circle of "the more fighting, the more chaos".