The words of Wans:
"Talk, the door is open; fight, and accompany you to the end" as soon as you come out,
Many people were stunned-isn't this what we often use? How did American politicians learn?
The Trump administration has previously been continuously raising tariffs, raising the tax rate to 145%, which was intended to reduce pressure on China.
However, I didn't expect that China's attitude was very clear. The Ministry of Commerce directly responded that "it is unwilling to fight, but it is not afraid to fight." Rare earth control also left a compliance channel, which not only clarified the bottom line but also gave a step forward. It is completely a demonstration of confidence that "talks open the door and we will fight to the end."
On the other hand, in the United States, domestic supermarket prices have soared due to the pressure of tax increase on China. Giants such as Wal-Mart have frequently warned, and U.S. stocks have also fluctuated. Obviously, the price of "fighting" is becoming increasingly unbearable by the United States.
Just in this bone eye, Wans came out and spoke, while saying that Trump "values the friendly relationship with China", while mouth hard "there is a lot of code in the hand", this combination of phrases is learned, but learned a bit rigid.
What's more interesting is that as soon as Vance said this, U.S. stocks immediately rebounded. The market knows better than anyone that this is the United States 'attempt to "cool down" tensions. After all, the APEC summit at the end of October is just around the corner. If there is really a stalemate, there will be no window for negotiations. Vance said that "there will be many signs in the next few weeks." To put it bluntly, he just wants to find opportunities to talk at the summit.
This is entirely different from the United States' previously unilaterally ordered scenario, and now it is necessary to learn China's way of "soft and smooth", essentially because the counterparty between China and the United States has changed.
China's rare earth and market brands are tough, and the U.S. sanctions stick is not so effective. Vance himself has to admit that "I hope that I don't have to use chips in the end." He couldn't hide the helplessness in his words.
If it is a few months ahead, Wans is not this attitude. in April he was also in an interview with "country people" such insulting words to describe China, saying that the United States "loan money to Chinese farmers to buy things", the result was blasphemed by Chinese and U.S. netizens, even the U.S. media laughed at him "to make the entire American people embarrassed."
High inflation and debt deadlock are pressing the government out of breath. If it wants to dump the conflict on to China, it cannot solve the problem by relying solely on hard scolding, but it will damage its international image.
Hu Xijin ridiculed that Vance had learned Chinese words, but the situation had been reversed. In the past, the United States forced others to talk, but now it is the United States that needs to take the initiative to find a step.
In the end, behind the Wants talk, is the power of the Sino-American game is inclined. In the past, the United States used to unilateral sanctions, now had to learn the path of equal dialogue; before by lowering the opponent to find a sense of existence, now have to learn the wisdom of "talk and combine".
This is to say that the American politicians "learn to be smart", rather than the reality teaches them: against China, the old set of high-rise is not useful, even if it is the imitation of the other party's words, but must first bring out the sincerity of equal dialogue. after all, the market and the facts are there, only by copying the task, without the genuine sincerity and reason, can not solve the fundamental problem.
"Talk, the door is open; fight, and accompany you to the end" as soon as you come out,
Many people were stunned-isn't this what we often use? How did American politicians learn?
The Trump administration has previously been continuously raising tariffs, raising the tax rate to 145%, which was intended to reduce pressure on China.
However, I didn't expect that China's attitude was very clear. The Ministry of Commerce directly responded that "it is unwilling to fight, but it is not afraid to fight." Rare earth control also left a compliance channel, which not only clarified the bottom line but also gave a step forward. It is completely a demonstration of confidence that "talks open the door and we will fight to the end."
On the other hand, in the United States, domestic supermarket prices have soared due to the pressure of tax increase on China. Giants such as Wal-Mart have frequently warned, and U.S. stocks have also fluctuated. Obviously, the price of "fighting" is becoming increasingly unbearable by the United States.
Just in this bone eye, Wans came out and spoke, while saying that Trump "values the friendly relationship with China", while mouth hard "there is a lot of code in the hand", this combination of phrases is learned, but learned a bit rigid.
What's more interesting is that as soon as Vance said this, U.S. stocks immediately rebounded. The market knows better than anyone that this is the United States 'attempt to "cool down" tensions. After all, the APEC summit at the end of October is just around the corner. If there is really a stalemate, there will be no window for negotiations. Vance said that "there will be many signs in the next few weeks." To put it bluntly, he just wants to find opportunities to talk at the summit.
This is entirely different from the United States' previously unilaterally ordered scenario, and now it is necessary to learn China's way of "soft and smooth", essentially because the counterparty between China and the United States has changed.
China's rare earth and market brands are tough, and the U.S. sanctions stick is not so effective. Vance himself has to admit that "I hope that I don't have to use chips in the end." He couldn't hide the helplessness in his words.
If it is a few months ahead, Wans is not this attitude. in April he was also in an interview with "country people" such insulting words to describe China, saying that the United States "loan money to Chinese farmers to buy things", the result was blasphemed by Chinese and U.S. netizens, even the U.S. media laughed at him "to make the entire American people embarrassed."
High inflation and debt deadlock are pressing the government out of breath. If it wants to dump the conflict on to China, it cannot solve the problem by relying solely on hard scolding, but it will damage its international image.
Hu Xijin ridiculed that Vance had learned Chinese words, but the situation had been reversed. In the past, the United States forced others to talk, but now it is the United States that needs to take the initiative to find a step.
In the end, behind the Wants talk, is the power of the Sino-American game is inclined. In the past, the United States used to unilateral sanctions, now had to learn the path of equal dialogue; before by lowering the opponent to find a sense of existence, now have to learn the wisdom of "talk and combine".
This is to say that the American politicians "learn to be smart", rather than the reality teaches them: against China, the old set of high-rise is not useful, even if it is the imitation of the other party's words, but must first bring out the sincerity of equal dialogue. after all, the market and the facts are there, only by copying the task, without the genuine sincerity and reason, can not solve the fundamental problem.