The position is out, Pakistan's cross-border air strikes Afghanistan's capital Kabul, almost the whole world has remained silent, the five great good people of the United Nations so far have not issued any statements on this, even Afghanistan itself has not made too fierce reaction. Pakistan's "South Asia's little hegemony" is a complete nickname. If Iran was initially able to take out half of Pakistan's courage, then it is not enough to mix up to the shame of today's no-existence sense.
In the past, Pakistan really had no say in the international arena, and it was overwhelmed by India in the South Asian subcontinent. India always pretended to be the "overlord of South Asia", and even had to choose the most expensive support scene to buy weapons. The S-400 air defense system spent $1.5 billion to put it on the border, claiming to be able to intercept all air targets.
In the Middle East, Iran relies on oil and regional influence, and is also more concerned than Pakistan, who could have imagined that Pakistan could have the hard air it is today.
What really turned Pakistan over was the head-to-head confrontation with India, especially the key battle in the India-Pakistan conflict. Pakistan directly launched the "iron wall" military operation, tearing India's "great power filter" to pieces.
India launched Operation Sindur first, and missiles bombed Pakistani targets. As a result, Pakistan sent JF-17 "Fierce Dragon" fighter jets straight to the hinterland of India, accurately delivering the S-400 air defense system that was blown up. Yes, India insisted that there was no such thing, but everyone knew that it was a slap in the face and did not dare to recognize it.
Immediately afterwards, the Pakistan Air Force Company raided several Indian air force bases. All military facilities in Gujarat and Ambara were blown up, Patancott Airport was directly paralyzed, and Pakistan also shot down an invading Indian fighter plane. The drone alone shot down 84 of them. On the other hand, Pakistan itself had only slightly damaged one aircraft. This exchange ratio is simply a unilateral defeat.
More interestingly, Pakistan has also launched cyber attacks, rumors that 70% of India's power grid is paralyzed, although India is eager to deny, but the people of Punjab have written their hearts on their faces as they robbed overnight, dragging their households to the safe zone.
In the end, India was the first to ask for a soft ceasefire, Modi said to the nation's speech to the mouth hard only "suspension" operation, and then went to the air force base to reassure the soldiers, the situation lived like losing the card and refused to account, the Prime Minister of Pakistan directly in the air force base openly said "these 6 fighter aircraft's hatred can Modi remember for a lifetime", the bottom line of this is not set out.
After this battle, the whole world finally understood that India, a so-called "military power", is actually strong on the outside but weak on the inside. It cannot even protect its most precious air defense system. The so-called "South Asian hegemony" is just a self-proclaimed joke.
With the record of cleaning up India, no one dares to easily comment if Pakistan launches another air strike on Kabul. You must know that this is not the first time Pakistan has taken action. In 2024, it will conduct two air strikes on the Afghan border. This time, it hit the capital directly. It is obviously a show of muscles, but the international community is collectively silent.
The United Nations has also jumped out a few speeches before the ceasefire in India, this time even the secretary-general did not speak, the five permanent members of the council did not say a word, but recognized Pakistan's right of speech in South Asia - after all, no one would be easily guilty of putting India on the ground for friction.
The Taliban in Afghanistan are even more interesting. They say they will "bear the consequences" but in fact they have not even sent more troops at the border. They are clear that Pakistan is not a soft persimmon that can be handled casually.
Looking at Iran, it lacks the courage to fight at will. Although he clearly holds oil resources and has a certain military foundation, he always becomes soft at critical times. When the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was at its peak, Iran was afraid of Israel's attack. Instead of thinking about a tough counterattack, Iran was busy conducting joint military exercises with Saudi Arabia. It also had to repeatedly confirm with neighboring countries that "don't lend bases to Israel" and pinned its hopes on diplomatic coordination.
This joint military exercise has been shouted for a long time, and even the specific time can't be determined, let alone the actual deterrence. Compared with Pakistan, whenever people are provoked, they directly bomb military facilities without saying a word. No matter what air defense system you have, they will fight correctly. This kind of hardness has brought the fear and silence of the international community.
If Iran has this enthusiasm, let alone in the Middle East, even if it breaks the wrist with Israel, it will not be passive, preferring to choose the mildest path, the result is that the influence is weaker and weaker, slowly becoming a side observer.
Pakistan's position is indeed realistic, from being pressured by India to counter-handedly bombarding each other's air defense system, from silent airstrikes to neighboring capital, no one dares to speak with his fist at every step.
The international community has always bullied the weak and was afraid of the hard. The harder you are, the less others dare to despise you. Pakistan has proved this with its actions. If Iran could learn half of its ferocity, it wouldn't have no right to speak in regional affairs now. After all, these days, diplomatic rhetoric alone can't support its position, and the hardness of real knives and guns is the most effective pass.
In the past, Pakistan really had no say in the international arena, and it was overwhelmed by India in the South Asian subcontinent. India always pretended to be the "overlord of South Asia", and even had to choose the most expensive support scene to buy weapons. The S-400 air defense system spent $1.5 billion to put it on the border, claiming to be able to intercept all air targets.
In the Middle East, Iran relies on oil and regional influence, and is also more concerned than Pakistan, who could have imagined that Pakistan could have the hard air it is today.
What really turned Pakistan over was the head-to-head confrontation with India, especially the key battle in the India-Pakistan conflict. Pakistan directly launched the "iron wall" military operation, tearing India's "great power filter" to pieces.
India launched Operation Sindur first, and missiles bombed Pakistani targets. As a result, Pakistan sent JF-17 "Fierce Dragon" fighter jets straight to the hinterland of India, accurately delivering the S-400 air defense system that was blown up. Yes, India insisted that there was no such thing, but everyone knew that it was a slap in the face and did not dare to recognize it.
Immediately afterwards, the Pakistan Air Force Company raided several Indian air force bases. All military facilities in Gujarat and Ambara were blown up, Patancott Airport was directly paralyzed, and Pakistan also shot down an invading Indian fighter plane. The drone alone shot down 84 of them. On the other hand, Pakistan itself had only slightly damaged one aircraft. This exchange ratio is simply a unilateral defeat.
More interestingly, Pakistan has also launched cyber attacks, rumors that 70% of India's power grid is paralyzed, although India is eager to deny, but the people of Punjab have written their hearts on their faces as they robbed overnight, dragging their households to the safe zone.
In the end, India was the first to ask for a soft ceasefire, Modi said to the nation's speech to the mouth hard only "suspension" operation, and then went to the air force base to reassure the soldiers, the situation lived like losing the card and refused to account, the Prime Minister of Pakistan directly in the air force base openly said "these 6 fighter aircraft's hatred can Modi remember for a lifetime", the bottom line of this is not set out.
After this battle, the whole world finally understood that India, a so-called "military power", is actually strong on the outside but weak on the inside. It cannot even protect its most precious air defense system. The so-called "South Asian hegemony" is just a self-proclaimed joke.
With the record of cleaning up India, no one dares to easily comment if Pakistan launches another air strike on Kabul. You must know that this is not the first time Pakistan has taken action. In 2024, it will conduct two air strikes on the Afghan border. This time, it hit the capital directly. It is obviously a show of muscles, but the international community is collectively silent.
The United Nations has also jumped out a few speeches before the ceasefire in India, this time even the secretary-general did not speak, the five permanent members of the council did not say a word, but recognized Pakistan's right of speech in South Asia - after all, no one would be easily guilty of putting India on the ground for friction.
The Taliban in Afghanistan are even more interesting. They say they will "bear the consequences" but in fact they have not even sent more troops at the border. They are clear that Pakistan is not a soft persimmon that can be handled casually.
Looking at Iran, it lacks the courage to fight at will. Although he clearly holds oil resources and has a certain military foundation, he always becomes soft at critical times. When the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was at its peak, Iran was afraid of Israel's attack. Instead of thinking about a tough counterattack, Iran was busy conducting joint military exercises with Saudi Arabia. It also had to repeatedly confirm with neighboring countries that "don't lend bases to Israel" and pinned its hopes on diplomatic coordination.
This joint military exercise has been shouted for a long time, and even the specific time can't be determined, let alone the actual deterrence. Compared with Pakistan, whenever people are provoked, they directly bomb military facilities without saying a word. No matter what air defense system you have, they will fight correctly. This kind of hardness has brought the fear and silence of the international community.
If Iran has this enthusiasm, let alone in the Middle East, even if it breaks the wrist with Israel, it will not be passive, preferring to choose the mildest path, the result is that the influence is weaker and weaker, slowly becoming a side observer.
Pakistan's position is indeed realistic, from being pressured by India to counter-handedly bombarding each other's air defense system, from silent airstrikes to neighboring capital, no one dares to speak with his fist at every step.
The international community has always bullied the weak and was afraid of the hard. The harder you are, the less others dare to despise you. Pakistan has proved this with its actions. If Iran could learn half of its ferocity, it wouldn't have no right to speak in regional affairs now. After all, these days, diplomatic rhetoric alone can't support its position, and the hardness of real knives and guns is the most effective pass.