Publisher / Wind
Preliminary
The United Nations Human Rights Debate Burst!
China represents Sun Li with one enemy eight, no longer passive, but the “human rights issue” crushed eight countries.
He fired all his firepower and pointed directly at his historical stains and realistic scandals, completely breaking the diplomatic tacit understanding. The most shocking thing was that Japan was the first to "break its defenses" and instantly became the focus, exposing its deepest historical stubborn disease!
Why does China rarely publicly name these eight countries? Why are you so excited about your little days? What excessive actions have these countries done?
in his way.
China's counterattack was not a strafe, but a "precise acupuncture". For the European Union, a 27-country consortium, Sun Lei directly attacked the most headache and divisive refugee human rights issue within it.
Those casualties that occurred when dealing with the refugee tide instantly made their image of "human rights teacher" ridiculous. This collective beating was intended to disintegrate their seemingly unified position.
As for members of the "Five Eyes Alliance" such as Britain, Canada and Australia, the criticism is more specific, almost with a knife, targeting each other's most sensitive and difficult to defend weaknesses.
Colonial history, indigenous issues, overseas military scandals, each of which is a painful point for their own domestic disputes.Sun Lei's core tactics can be called a "mirror counterattack". Didn't you accuse me of ethnic minority problems?
Let’s talk about England first. Discriminatory speech and violent crimes against Asians and other groups there are intensifying, with the wounding incident in the London Underground being a bloody example.
Do you like to talk about history? Then we turn the old records of Canada, especially the old sites of shelter schools, under which archaeologists and investigators have discovered the remains of a large number of indigenous children forced to assimilate indigenous peoples.Let them abandon their language, culture and beliefs, thus destroying the original national identity.
These real situations were firmly stood on the podium by Sun Lei, shining on every attacker.
Regarding Australia, he directly pointed out the serious crimes committed by its troops during the war in Afghanistan. Investigations showed that the Australian military illegally killed at least 39 civilians, including the elderly and children, during combat operations. The families of the victims have not yet received due compensation or formal apology.
This naked state violence, coupled with its long-standing neglect of indigenous rights at home, forms an extremely ironic picture.
This style of play is to tell you accurately: The issues you used to attack me are precisely the deepest crimes you have committed on yourself. Whether it is historical original sin or contemporary systemic discrimination, none of you are clean.
In this round of intensive counterattack, an unexpected episode occurred. Among all the named targets, Only the Japanese representative could not sit still on the spot. He immediately spoke to express his dissatisfaction and tried to refute it. This move was tantamount to taking the initiative to ram the gun.
Why does Japan hurry?
Sun Li originally criticized Japan, but also joined with other countries, The main focus is on the history of the Second World War aggression, the ambiguous "comfort women" issue, the manipulation of historical textbooks, and old issues such as the status of domestic women and Okinawa indigenous discrimination.
This was part of the "conventional operation", but Japan's on-site rejection gave China an excellent "supplemental" opportunity, and Sun Li quickly exercised the second response, this time, the firepower was significantly escalated.
He no longer merely quantifies the issue, but directly characterizes Japan’s behavior, and severely condemns its unwillingness to face the history of militarism and crimes against humanity.He also pointedly pointed out his contradictory behavior of claiming to support peace while frantically "backing" on historical issues.
This record, fast and fiercely, makes Japan's excuse appear pale and powerless, and it can be said that this "special upgrading treatment" of Japan has fully demonstrated the response speed and deterrence of China's diplomacy in the scene.
Criticising a country that has no regrets on historical issues, the Chinese side has no psychological burden, and treating a country such as the small days itself cannot have a good face.
conclusion
Ambassador Sun Lei's speech at the United Nations was far more than a simple dispute of words. It marks China’s shift from a passive advocate in the game of global governance, especially human rights issues, to an active agenda maker.
The successful use of the "mirror counterattack" strategy heralds the arrival of a new era.
The past pattern of unilateral accusations by the West and passive explanations by other countries is being broken and will be replaced by a multi-dimensional "mutual review."
You want to criticize others? yes, but first make sure you can withstand the same examination.This confrontation declares that the rules of international human rights dialogue are being rewritten.