In less than a day, the world-renowned Nobel Peace Prize list will be revealed!
If the biggest attraction this year is undoubtedly our old acquaintance-Trump.
The former president + current president of the United States, from the first term to the present term, has been waiting year after year for this Nobel Prize, and has worked hard to win this prize.
Why? Because Obama took it.
In Trump's eyes, Obama's award is "not worthy of its name"-just nine months after taking office, the war is still fighting, and nuclear weapons have not really been reduced. How can it be "peaceful"? But it happened that they just got it.
Trump couldn't swallow this tone.
For this award, Trump has been running around this year, working hard for "peace."
The Russian conflict is mediated.
Friction between India and Pakistan? He called on both sides to calm down.
Aya conflict, he presided over the signing of the agreement.
He sent special messengers around.
He strongly promoted the first phase of the agreement.
You see, there is him everywhere.
In our words, this is called "brushing history", and the kind that does not count the quality, only the quantity.
The most obvious is the sudden ceasefire reached in Gaza over the past few days.
The agreement requires Israel to stop air strikes, withdraw troops, release detainees and open humanitarian channels...
At first glance, it is clear that this agreement is unacceptable in itself to the emerging Netanyahu, the far-right group that is supposed to take full possession of Gaza.
Then why would Israel sign it?
Some say it was a play by Bibi with Trump.
After all, the Nobel Prize winning was that Trump urgently needed a “heavyweight performance” to hit the prize.
A lot of people wonder: why is he so attached to this award?
To be honest, Trump is not lacking in name, not lacking profits, and even less lack of traffic.
What he lacks is "orthodox recognition".
Obama won the award in 2009 and became the Democratic Party's bragging capital for decades;
What about Trump? The media scolded him all day long for building walls, withdrawing from groups, and fighting trade wars.
He needed the prize too much to face critics and prove that he was a “true peacemaker.”
Moreover, he wasn’t just thinking, he was really trying to ask.
He called Norway’s finance minister, former NATO secretary-general Stoltenberg, and when he talked about tariffs, he didn’t forget to say: “Look at my peace prize...”
He also mobilized leaders from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Israel, and Pakistan to publicly support him for the award.
This operation can be called the first person in the history of the Nobel Prize. Others are passively nominated, and he takes the initiative to form a team to brush tickets.
But the Nobel Committee doesn't eat this!
You have a good plan, and I have a wall ladder.
The higher Trump is, the more the Nobel Committee dares to give him the prize.
Why?
Because this award is essentially a “political code” for Europeans.
At the beginning of this year, Polish Foreign Minister Sikorski publicly "reminded" Trump:
“We Europeans say the Nobel Peace Prize, you want to get it? first look at our interests!”
What does that mean?
Just on the Russia-Ukraine issue, Trump, do you want direct peace talks with Putin? No way!
Europe wants Ukraine to fight to the end, and you and the United States must continue to provide military assistance.
If you don’t listen to us, we won’t give you the prize.
See, that is the reality.
The Nobel Peace Prize has never been a pure "peace" prize, but a "sided" prize with a clear political stance.
In history, this award has long changed.
The most ironic is Obama.
When he won the prize in 2009, the United States was still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Later, he also sent troops to Libya, and the Nobel Committee was slapped in the face.
In fact, at the beginning, he was embarrassed to win this prize himself, and rarely won a big prize.
There is also the “environmental girl” Tombayri, who, while also travelling in Gaza with a fleet, has made a substantial contribution to world peace?
But she was nominated.
So you see, this award has long been based not on "who really promoted peace", but on "who conforms to the current political correctness of the West."
Will Trump win the prize tonight?
almost impossible .
First, he’s too high and the Nobel Prize can give you, but you can’t reach out for it.
If the committee really gave him the prize, it would lose its independence, fairness, and authority.
This award will be worthless in the future.
In addition, Trump sings counter to Europe on a series of issues such as Ukraine, Israel, trade, climate.
How can an award controlled by Europeans be awarded to a "destroyer"?
In addition, the ceasefire agreement in Gaza has just been signed, it is still unclear, and the first phase of the agreement is broken, and Israel can turn his face again at any time.
Do you want to win an award based on this kind of temporary "performance"? The judges are not stupid.
Who is most likely to win the prize?
Currently, it is speculated that those who are more likely to win the award will be organizations or individuals who have long promoted environmental protection, refugee relief or anti-nuclear proliferation.
Some people even speculate that it may be awarded to organizations that oppose Trump-after all, this is "politically correct".
But whoever it is, it will not be Trump.
Soon, the mystery will be revealed.
If Trump didn’t win the prize, I guess he would be furious on Truth Social:
"The Nobel Prize is too unfair! Too political! They are jealous of my achievements!"
But if, I mean if, he really got...
Perhaps that was not because he loved peace so much, but because he was so good at "torturing" that the judges finally couldn't withstand his offensive.
But in my opinion, a man who really promotes peace will not say every month, “I stopped a war.”
Not to mention using the ceasefire agreement as a bargaining chip to compete for awards before the war in Gaza goes out.
Peace is not a business, much less a political show.