US media: China's J-16 hangs live ammunition to help North Korea expel Canadian military aircraft!
CBS News that a Canadian Air Force CP-140 "Light" maritime patrol aircraft, over the East Sea tracking North Korean vessels "engaged in illegal trade in violation of UN sanctions", was removed by a Chinese air force J-16.
The US media "looked wronged" and said that the Canadian military plane was carrying out the "Neon Operation" of the United Nations at that time, implying that the Chinese Air Force helped North Korea evade UN sanctions. That's true, when the world can't see who is pretending to be confused?
Under the banner of "tracking North Korea's illegal trade ships", CP-140 flew closer and closer to China's airspace over the East China Sea. The Chinese Air Force first sent the J-11 fighter plane forward to warn it, clearly reminding it that it was close to sensitive airspace. But it was better to add the plane, but he only fluttered back the sentence "in international airspace" and still went his own way.
You know, as a long-endurance anti-submarine patrol aircraft, the CP-140 has far better endurance than fighter jets. After monitoring for a period of time, our military fighter jets replaced the J-16 relay with live ammunition-the Thunderbolt-15 and Thunderbolt-10 missiles under the wings are clearly visible, which is the real "solemn warning."
Until the air confrontation ended, the two aircraft were only 60 meters away recently, and a little carelessness could trigger the gun and fire.The "United Nations operation" in the US media is basically taking the chicken wool as the arrow.
China has never been an opponent of the United Nations sanctions against the DPRK. It voted in favor of Security Council Resolution 2094 as early as the vote. We have been earnestly implementing that sanctions resolution, which is called the "most severe", from nuclear material embargo to financial restrictions.
Being able to implement sanctions does not mean allowing other countries' military aircraft to run to their own doorsteps to "run wild". The United Nations resolution governs illegal trade. When did Canada authorize to fly anti-submarine patrol aircraft to China's airspace? It's like someone who says he wants to catch a thief, but looks into your window with a telescope. Who can bear it?
Not to mention the "careful thoughts" of the CP-140. This thing is not a simple "tracking ship" tool at all. As a professional anti-submarine aircraft, it can accurately draw charts of China's offshore waters, detect the trajectory of underwater submarines, and even collect electromagnetic signals.
The East Sea is an important activity area of our navy, such a "intelligence vacuum cleaner" flies in the air, like someone monitors outside your home walls, even the movements in the house want to clean up.
Expulsion is light, and any sovereign country will not sit idly by.
The distorted reports of the U.S. media, it is said that the double standards are working. the United States itself regularly sends military aircraft at the gate of other countries to carry out "approximate reconnaissance", and even runs to the South China Sea "freedom of navigation", never saying that it "violates the rules".
Canada followed the United States as a younger brother and drove military aircraft to the doorstep of China. When it was driven away, it became a "victim." This logic is simply ridiculous-are you only allowed to wield swords and guns in front of other people's homes, and are not allowed to close the doors and guard the homes?
There are netizens who say well, if this is "helping North Korea to avoid sanctions", then should China send anti-submarines to the Caribbean Sea and help the United States to "catch drug dealers" by the way?
The first warning after the evacuation, the first 11 demonstration and the second 16 hanging relay, each step left some space, fully in accordance with international practice. This is not "hard", but the basic defense of sovereignty. Know that airspace security is the core component of national sovereignty, even "international airspace", can not tolerate provocation by other military aircraft.
If Canada really only wants to implement the UN resolutions, can completely inform through normal channels, why do the anti-submarines engage in "spraying the edge"? is to say, is to help the United States to spy on China's military intelligence, this small calculator who can't see?
There are also people who say "international airspace freedom", but freedom is never without borders. Like driving on the road, it is not possible to break through the courtyards of others because the road is public. CP-140's flight route clearly runs through China's airspace, and after several warnings still does not change the direction, which has gone beyond the scope of "normal navigation" and has become a deliberate provocation.
China fighter jets are not "rough", but use the most direct way to tell the other party: Don't push your luck, China's air defense is not for decoration. The fundamental reason why the US media confuses right and wrong is that they do not want to see my country's firm attitude in safeguarding sovereignty.
Over the years, our military strength has steadily improved, from the J-20 to the Shandong ship, from the Dongfeng missile to hypersonic weapons. The strengthening of national defense strength has made it difficult for some countries to sit still. They are accustomed to the privilege of "coming whenever they want and leaving whenever they want" in the past, but now they shout "unfair" when they are stopped. This mentality itself is ridiculous.
In the final analysis, the essence of this disturbance is that Canada used the name of the United Nations to conduct reconnaissance, and the US media used the report to smear public opinion. But the facts are here: the J-16 drove away the provocations and defended China's sovereignty; no matter how distorted the US media can, it cannot change the fact that Canadian military aircraft deliberately approached China's airspace.
We always respect the Charter of the United Nations, but will not take sovereignty in exchange for "air". next time there will be foreign military aircraft carrying various flags to "touch" the East Sea, the real bomb warning of the J-16. after all, the safety in front of the home, must be kept by itself. # Chinese aircraft simulation to strike the British military ships what it means # # J-16 aircraft # # # on the headline
CBS News that a Canadian Air Force CP-140 "Light" maritime patrol aircraft, over the East Sea tracking North Korean vessels "engaged in illegal trade in violation of UN sanctions", was removed by a Chinese air force J-16.
The US media "looked wronged" and said that the Canadian military plane was carrying out the "Neon Operation" of the United Nations at that time, implying that the Chinese Air Force helped North Korea evade UN sanctions. That's true, when the world can't see who is pretending to be confused?
Under the banner of "tracking North Korea's illegal trade ships", CP-140 flew closer and closer to China's airspace over the East China Sea. The Chinese Air Force first sent the J-11 fighter plane forward to warn it, clearly reminding it that it was close to sensitive airspace. But it was better to add the plane, but he only fluttered back the sentence "in international airspace" and still went his own way.
You know, as a long-endurance anti-submarine patrol aircraft, the CP-140 has far better endurance than fighter jets. After monitoring for a period of time, our military fighter jets replaced the J-16 relay with live ammunition-the Thunderbolt-15 and Thunderbolt-10 missiles under the wings are clearly visible, which is the real "solemn warning."
Until the air confrontation ended, the two aircraft were only 60 meters away recently, and a little carelessness could trigger the gun and fire.The "United Nations operation" in the US media is basically taking the chicken wool as the arrow.
China has never been an opponent of the United Nations sanctions against the DPRK. It voted in favor of Security Council Resolution 2094 as early as the vote. We have been earnestly implementing that sanctions resolution, which is called the "most severe", from nuclear material embargo to financial restrictions.
Being able to implement sanctions does not mean allowing other countries' military aircraft to run to their own doorsteps to "run wild". The United Nations resolution governs illegal trade. When did Canada authorize to fly anti-submarine patrol aircraft to China's airspace? It's like someone who says he wants to catch a thief, but looks into your window with a telescope. Who can bear it?
Not to mention the "careful thoughts" of the CP-140. This thing is not a simple "tracking ship" tool at all. As a professional anti-submarine aircraft, it can accurately draw charts of China's offshore waters, detect the trajectory of underwater submarines, and even collect electromagnetic signals.
The East Sea is an important activity area of our navy, such a "intelligence vacuum cleaner" flies in the air, like someone monitors outside your home walls, even the movements in the house want to clean up.
Expulsion is light, and any sovereign country will not sit idly by.
The distorted reports of the U.S. media, it is said that the double standards are working. the United States itself regularly sends military aircraft at the gate of other countries to carry out "approximate reconnaissance", and even runs to the South China Sea "freedom of navigation", never saying that it "violates the rules".
Canada followed the United States as a younger brother and drove military aircraft to the doorstep of China. When it was driven away, it became a "victim." This logic is simply ridiculous-are you only allowed to wield swords and guns in front of other people's homes, and are not allowed to close the doors and guard the homes?
There are netizens who say well, if this is "helping North Korea to avoid sanctions", then should China send anti-submarines to the Caribbean Sea and help the United States to "catch drug dealers" by the way?
The first warning after the evacuation, the first 11 demonstration and the second 16 hanging relay, each step left some space, fully in accordance with international practice. This is not "hard", but the basic defense of sovereignty. Know that airspace security is the core component of national sovereignty, even "international airspace", can not tolerate provocation by other military aircraft.
If Canada really only wants to implement the UN resolutions, can completely inform through normal channels, why do the anti-submarines engage in "spraying the edge"? is to say, is to help the United States to spy on China's military intelligence, this small calculator who can't see?
There are also people who say "international airspace freedom", but freedom is never without borders. Like driving on the road, it is not possible to break through the courtyards of others because the road is public. CP-140's flight route clearly runs through China's airspace, and after several warnings still does not change the direction, which has gone beyond the scope of "normal navigation" and has become a deliberate provocation.
China fighter jets are not "rough", but use the most direct way to tell the other party: Don't push your luck, China's air defense is not for decoration. The fundamental reason why the US media confuses right and wrong is that they do not want to see my country's firm attitude in safeguarding sovereignty.
Over the years, our military strength has steadily improved, from the J-20 to the Shandong ship, from the Dongfeng missile to hypersonic weapons. The strengthening of national defense strength has made it difficult for some countries to sit still. They are accustomed to the privilege of "coming whenever they want and leaving whenever they want" in the past, but now they shout "unfair" when they are stopped. This mentality itself is ridiculous.
In the final analysis, the essence of this disturbance is that Canada used the name of the United Nations to conduct reconnaissance, and the US media used the report to smear public opinion. But the facts are here: the J-16 drove away the provocations and defended China's sovereignty; no matter how distorted the US media can, it cannot change the fact that Canadian military aircraft deliberately approached China's airspace.
We always respect the Charter of the United Nations, but will not take sovereignty in exchange for "air". next time there will be foreign military aircraft carrying various flags to "touch" the East Sea, the real bomb warning of the J-16. after all, the safety in front of the home, must be kept by itself. # Chinese aircraft simulation to strike the British military ships what it means # # J-16 aircraft # # # on the headline