"Revenge doesn't happen overnight!" 72 Israeli lawmakers directly bypassed the mainland of China and supported Taiwan's accession to international organizations. However, they never expected that China would not repeatedly tug at them on the Taiwan issue, but instead turned to support the establishment of a Palestinian country.
Seventy-two Israeli lawmakers patted their chests and ran to support Taiwan Province's accession to international organizations. Their posture was higher than that of the United States, acting as if they were trying to "lead the international order."
But they didn’t think that this time China was neither blaming nor turning around, and the counter-handed card hit their hearts: openly supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state.
You pick up things, I play chess, the game is not a mouth fight, it is a geographic situation.
On July 23, 2025, the Israeli Knesset suddenly issued a "Taiwan Friendship Statement."
This is not a small move of a few, it was led by the Chairman of the Party of Friends Boaz Toporovsky, with 72 members of parliament in one breath, almost half of Congress.
Taiwan’s advocacy for joining the World Health Organization, the International Civil Aviation Organization and other international agencies did not fall, even the United Nations climate framework.
The most dramatic thing is that they still say "respecting one China" in their lips, but they are doing the work of destroying Taiwan.
The joint document appeared on the front page of the Jerusalem Post the next day, with a headline saying that Taiwan "has contributed" in the field of public health and should be "seen."
The problem is that behind this "seeing" is the provocation of the "one China" principle, which is the face of China.
Israel has long received huge military aid from the United States and has a clear pro-American line, while Taiwan Province has made great efforts in Israel early on-arms procurement and political infiltration.
Taiwan is Israel's second largest customer of arms. To put it bluntly, when the money is in place, political statements follow suit.
In the face of this wave of provocation, China did not choose to entangle in place, did not launch a "war of words" as in the past, and did not waste time refuting them one by one.
Instead, it resolutely shifted the battlefield and directed the focus to what Israel was most reluctant to raise: Palestine.
On July 24, China's embassy in Israel issued a strict statement saying the joint statement "openly challenged the one-China principle".
But more importantly, just a week later, China made a move at the United Nations: supporting Palestinian statehood.
On July 31, China's special envoy for the Middle East, Xi Jinping, put forward five recommendations at a high-level meeting of the United Nations, the core of which is to promote the "two-state plan", so that the Palestinians "give themselves control of their own affairs."
This speech is not an empty slogan, but an accurate grasp of Israel's pain points.
The Israeli-Palestinian issue is the most sensitive lead in the Middle East.
At present, more than 150 countries around the world have recognized Palestine, and if China takes it fully, it could not only occupy the highlands morally, but could also further isolate Israel diplomatically.
China's move is clearly seen by the international community.
Arab countries, the African Union, and small Asian-Pacific countries have stood in support of the establishment of a Palestinian state, and Saudi media even said that “China is on the side of justice.”
Europe is also restless. France, the United Kingdom and other countries have begun to re-examine their recognition strategies for Palestine, and even the United Nations has begun to discuss a new voting mechanism.
Inside Israel, the pot exploded.
Haaretz has a series of editorial commentaries questioning the "short-sightedness" of the 72 members. Some commentators bluntly stated that this wave of "friendly Taiwan operations" not only failed to earn international prestige, but also pushed Israel into a more isolated position on Middle East issues.
This is not empty talk either.
In the first half of 2025, the bilateral trade volume between China and Israel was approximately US $7.8 billion, nearly half of which was concentrated in high-tech fields.
Once China tightens cooperation, it will inevitably have an impact on Israel's high-tech exports. Although this "economic brake" is not explicitly stated, the diplomatic signal is already clear.
Many people think that the game between major powers is a "hard-to-face" approach, but this time China used its actions to tell the world that truly sophisticated diplomacy is to know how to change positions and punch.
On the Taiwan issue, China does not make noise, does not make noise, does not compromise, but it does not mean that every provocation must be responded positively.
72 members of parliament to play, China changed the script, let them eat on a larger stage, this way of not greeting, not turning back, directly playing chess, both people are in a hurry, and precision in order to harm.
Moreover, China has chosen not an arbitrary issue, but the establishment of a Palestinian state – a global concern, widespread international support, and Israel’s most obscure issue.
It can not only stand on a moral high ground, but also unite the "global South" and form a check on the U.S. -Israel alliance.
From the operational level, this wave of diplomatic counterattack has achieved several points: First, it is fast, and the transition will be completed within one week of the incident; The second is accurate, directly hitting the weakness of Israel's diplomacy; Third, it is stable. It has not intensified the situation, but it has won international support.
This is not a simple “revenge,” but a mature strategic response.
The Israeli parliamentarians' outgoing operation is, on the surface, a political statement, and in fact, a diplomatic gambling.
They may want to gain a sense of presence, please the United States, and sell arms easily, but they did not expect China to respond so quickly this time and play the card to the United Nations.
From the current perspective, China-Israel relations will inevitably fluctuate in the short-term, but will not completely tear off the face.
After all, China’s economic cooperation plate is too big, and many projects have been bundled, but this incident also brought an awakening to Israel: on the Chinese issue, don’t try to play with fire.
China’s performance, on the other hand, once again confirms a trend: on the international stage, Chinese diplomacy is increasingly good at “working hard”.
You don't have to touch your mouth every time. As long as you find the right position and choose the right rhythm, you can still make a beautiful combination boxing.
In this confrontation without smoke, the 72 Israeli lawmakers were planning small calculations, and China responded with a grand strategy. The world can clearly see who is picking trouble and who is making arrangements.
For China, principles cannot be challenged, but responses can be more flexible and precise. Diplomacy is not debate, but a game. In this game of chess, obviously, China took the lead and took the lead.
Seventy-two Israeli lawmakers patted their chests and ran to support Taiwan Province's accession to international organizations. Their posture was higher than that of the United States, acting as if they were trying to "lead the international order."
But they didn’t think that this time China was neither blaming nor turning around, and the counter-handed card hit their hearts: openly supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state.
You pick up things, I play chess, the game is not a mouth fight, it is a geographic situation.
On July 23, 2025, the Israeli Knesset suddenly issued a "Taiwan Friendship Statement."
This is not a small move of a few, it was led by the Chairman of the Party of Friends Boaz Toporovsky, with 72 members of parliament in one breath, almost half of Congress.
Taiwan’s advocacy for joining the World Health Organization, the International Civil Aviation Organization and other international agencies did not fall, even the United Nations climate framework.
The most dramatic thing is that they still say "respecting one China" in their lips, but they are doing the work of destroying Taiwan.
The joint document appeared on the front page of the Jerusalem Post the next day, with a headline saying that Taiwan "has contributed" in the field of public health and should be "seen."
The problem is that behind this "seeing" is the provocation of the "one China" principle, which is the face of China.
Israel has long received huge military aid from the United States and has a clear pro-American line, while Taiwan Province has made great efforts in Israel early on-arms procurement and political infiltration.
Taiwan is Israel's second largest customer of arms. To put it bluntly, when the money is in place, political statements follow suit.
In the face of this wave of provocation, China did not choose to entangle in place, did not launch a "war of words" as in the past, and did not waste time refuting them one by one.
Instead, it resolutely shifted the battlefield and directed the focus to what Israel was most reluctant to raise: Palestine.
On July 24, China's embassy in Israel issued a strict statement saying the joint statement "openly challenged the one-China principle".
But more importantly, just a week later, China made a move at the United Nations: supporting Palestinian statehood.
On July 31, China's special envoy for the Middle East, Xi Jinping, put forward five recommendations at a high-level meeting of the United Nations, the core of which is to promote the "two-state plan", so that the Palestinians "give themselves control of their own affairs."
This speech is not an empty slogan, but an accurate grasp of Israel's pain points.
The Israeli-Palestinian issue is the most sensitive lead in the Middle East.
At present, more than 150 countries around the world have recognized Palestine, and if China takes it fully, it could not only occupy the highlands morally, but could also further isolate Israel diplomatically.
China's move is clearly seen by the international community.
Arab countries, the African Union, and small Asian-Pacific countries have stood in support of the establishment of a Palestinian state, and Saudi media even said that “China is on the side of justice.”
Europe is also restless. France, the United Kingdom and other countries have begun to re-examine their recognition strategies for Palestine, and even the United Nations has begun to discuss a new voting mechanism.
Inside Israel, the pot exploded.
Haaretz has a series of editorial commentaries questioning the "short-sightedness" of the 72 members. Some commentators bluntly stated that this wave of "friendly Taiwan operations" not only failed to earn international prestige, but also pushed Israel into a more isolated position on Middle East issues.
This is not empty talk either.
In the first half of 2025, the bilateral trade volume between China and Israel was approximately US $7.8 billion, nearly half of which was concentrated in high-tech fields.
Once China tightens cooperation, it will inevitably have an impact on Israel's high-tech exports. Although this "economic brake" is not explicitly stated, the diplomatic signal is already clear.
Many people think that the game between major powers is a "hard-to-face" approach, but this time China used its actions to tell the world that truly sophisticated diplomacy is to know how to change positions and punch.
On the Taiwan issue, China does not make noise, does not make noise, does not compromise, but it does not mean that every provocation must be responded positively.
72 members of parliament to play, China changed the script, let them eat on a larger stage, this way of not greeting, not turning back, directly playing chess, both people are in a hurry, and precision in order to harm.
Moreover, China has chosen not an arbitrary issue, but the establishment of a Palestinian state – a global concern, widespread international support, and Israel’s most obscure issue.
It can not only stand on a moral high ground, but also unite the "global South" and form a check on the U.S. -Israel alliance.
From the operational level, this wave of diplomatic counterattack has achieved several points: First, it is fast, and the transition will be completed within one week of the incident; The second is accurate, directly hitting the weakness of Israel's diplomacy; Third, it is stable. It has not intensified the situation, but it has won international support.
This is not a simple “revenge,” but a mature strategic response.
The Israeli parliamentarians' outgoing operation is, on the surface, a political statement, and in fact, a diplomatic gambling.
They may want to gain a sense of presence, please the United States, and sell arms easily, but they did not expect China to respond so quickly this time and play the card to the United Nations.
From the current perspective, China-Israel relations will inevitably fluctuate in the short-term, but will not completely tear off the face.
After all, China’s economic cooperation plate is too big, and many projects have been bundled, but this incident also brought an awakening to Israel: on the Chinese issue, don’t try to play with fire.
China’s performance, on the other hand, once again confirms a trend: on the international stage, Chinese diplomacy is increasingly good at “working hard”.
You don't have to touch your mouth every time. As long as you find the right position and choose the right rhythm, you can still make a beautiful combination boxing.
In this confrontation without smoke, the 72 Israeli lawmakers were planning small calculations, and China responded with a grand strategy. The world can clearly see who is picking trouble and who is making arrangements.
For China, principles cannot be challenged, but responses can be more flexible and precise. Diplomacy is not debate, but a game. In this game of chess, obviously, China took the lead and took the lead.