The Russian army used a three-ton “groom” aircraft bomb to bomb the bridge of the Ukrainian logistics supply line!
A three-ton aerial bomb fell from an altitude of 10,000 meters, but the expected bridge fracture did not appear on the ground-this accident happened near the Ukrainian army logistics channel north of Slavyansk.
The FAB-3000 flying bomb, known as the "groom", had gone along the crucial bridge supplied by the Ukrainian front, but eventually exploded on the space not far from the target, and the rocks of the rocks stacked into one-to-one-high ground, the bridge still allows trucks to slowly pass.
Anyone familiar with the battlefield knows that the FAB-3000 is no ordinary bomb. A single charge weighs 1.4 tons. The blast wave of the explosion can overturn armored vehicles within a kilometer. Previously, it was accurately blown up in Zaporizhh region. The bridge on the Sologya River temporarily interrupted the Ukrainian army's supply.
This time the Russian army was bombed with Su-34 fighter bombers, such fighter aircraft could be bombed 100 kilometers away with the UMPK sliding kit, according to the accuracy should be controlled within 5 meters, can be distracted in Slavyansk.
Later, after looking at battlefield monitoring and analysis, I realized that the high probability of deviation is due to the combination of multiple factors. There has been low-altitude turbulence around Slavyansk recently, which will interfere with the flight trajectory of gliding bombs. In addition, the Ukrainian army may have activated small electronic jamming equipment. Although it did not completely disrupt navigation, it was enough to make the landing point deviate tens of meters.
Some military observers say that this situation is not new in the modern battlefield, intelligence interference and environmental interference can make "precise strikes" become "unfortunate events", as before the tornado rocket cannon has also appeared similar deviations.
This missing aerial bomb actually reveals the current tactical thinking of the Russian army. In recent months, the intensity of the Russian army's bombing in Sloviansk has increased significantly, because this is the logistical core of the Ukrainian army supporting the front line of the Red Army village. There are not only bridges, but also many ammunition depots and drone spare parts warehouses.
They added gliding kits to the old aircraft bombs in stock. The cost was only US$40,000 each, which was much cheaper than cruise missiles, but it could achieve long-range strikes. This "new use of old bombs" method really helped the Russian army save a lot of ammunition costs. However, costs have been reduced, and occasional fluctuations in accuracy seem to have become an inevitable price.
Looking at this battlefield detail, we can better understand the importance of the precision strike system. In today's military operations, the entire chain of control from target positioning to ammunition release is too critical, which requires strong satellite navigation, real-time monitoring and electronic countermeasures capabilities.
Our country's development in these fields is obvious to all. Whether it is high-precision navigation systems or advanced battlefield perception technology, such "outrageous deviations" can be minimized. Behind this is actually the hard support of comprehensive national strength.
The three-ton missile, which did not break the supply line of the Ukrainian army, became a mirror of the battlefield. It illuminated the balance of technology and cost in modern warfare, and also allowed people to see even mature weapons systems, in the complex environment of the battlefield will "fall chains."
The crater north of Slavyansk is still there. The Ukrainian army has temporarily reinforced the nearby bridge with steel plates. The Russian bombing continues, except that the calibration of the reconnaissance drone has been significantly added during subsequent bomb drops.
The situation on the battlefield has always been one-off, and the deviation of a bomb can affect the local supply rhythm, but it is difficult to change the overall situation.
But then again, do you think this deviation was a purely technical accident or a test before the Russian military adjusted its tactics? If it was replaced by a more advanced strike system, could this kind of situation be completely avoided?
A three-ton aerial bomb fell from an altitude of 10,000 meters, but the expected bridge fracture did not appear on the ground-this accident happened near the Ukrainian army logistics channel north of Slavyansk.
The FAB-3000 flying bomb, known as the "groom", had gone along the crucial bridge supplied by the Ukrainian front, but eventually exploded on the space not far from the target, and the rocks of the rocks stacked into one-to-one-high ground, the bridge still allows trucks to slowly pass.
Anyone familiar with the battlefield knows that the FAB-3000 is no ordinary bomb. A single charge weighs 1.4 tons. The blast wave of the explosion can overturn armored vehicles within a kilometer. Previously, it was accurately blown up in Zaporizhh region. The bridge on the Sologya River temporarily interrupted the Ukrainian army's supply.
This time the Russian army was bombed with Su-34 fighter bombers, such fighter aircraft could be bombed 100 kilometers away with the UMPK sliding kit, according to the accuracy should be controlled within 5 meters, can be distracted in Slavyansk.
Later, after looking at battlefield monitoring and analysis, I realized that the high probability of deviation is due to the combination of multiple factors. There has been low-altitude turbulence around Slavyansk recently, which will interfere with the flight trajectory of gliding bombs. In addition, the Ukrainian army may have activated small electronic jamming equipment. Although it did not completely disrupt navigation, it was enough to make the landing point deviate tens of meters.
Some military observers say that this situation is not new in the modern battlefield, intelligence interference and environmental interference can make "precise strikes" become "unfortunate events", as before the tornado rocket cannon has also appeared similar deviations.
This missing aerial bomb actually reveals the current tactical thinking of the Russian army. In recent months, the intensity of the Russian army's bombing in Sloviansk has increased significantly, because this is the logistical core of the Ukrainian army supporting the front line of the Red Army village. There are not only bridges, but also many ammunition depots and drone spare parts warehouses.
They added gliding kits to the old aircraft bombs in stock. The cost was only US$40,000 each, which was much cheaper than cruise missiles, but it could achieve long-range strikes. This "new use of old bombs" method really helped the Russian army save a lot of ammunition costs. However, costs have been reduced, and occasional fluctuations in accuracy seem to have become an inevitable price.
Looking at this battlefield detail, we can better understand the importance of the precision strike system. In today's military operations, the entire chain of control from target positioning to ammunition release is too critical, which requires strong satellite navigation, real-time monitoring and electronic countermeasures capabilities.
Our country's development in these fields is obvious to all. Whether it is high-precision navigation systems or advanced battlefield perception technology, such "outrageous deviations" can be minimized. Behind this is actually the hard support of comprehensive national strength.
The three-ton missile, which did not break the supply line of the Ukrainian army, became a mirror of the battlefield. It illuminated the balance of technology and cost in modern warfare, and also allowed people to see even mature weapons systems, in the complex environment of the battlefield will "fall chains."
The crater north of Slavyansk is still there. The Ukrainian army has temporarily reinforced the nearby bridge with steel plates. The Russian bombing continues, except that the calibration of the reconnaissance drone has been significantly added during subsequent bomb drops.
The situation on the battlefield has always been one-off, and the deviation of a bomb can affect the local supply rhythm, but it is difficult to change the overall situation.
But then again, do you think this deviation was a purely technical accident or a test before the Russian military adjusted its tactics? If it was replaced by a more advanced strike system, could this kind of situation be completely avoided?