The 80th General Assembly again appeared in a bad drama, before Trump blasphemed the lift of the strike, after the US government was busy with revoking the visa of the President of Colombia.
On September 23, 2025, the "most diplomatic American president" set fire to an elevator in the United Nations General Assembly.The ladder shell and the vocabulary failed, and the first lady barely knocked her mouth to bite mud.
In this case, Trump directly shattered: “This is two things I got from the United Nations, a bad automatic ladder and a bad pronouncer.”
Complaining that the United Nations institutions are broken, the United States has so far been indebted to more than $3 billion in subscriptions, of which only the regular budget for 2025 will be indebted to $8.2 billion.
A landlord who can't afford even property costs, is sorry to abandon the elevator broken? did not let you walk up the stairs, and stand "talk nothing" is a convenience.
According to the practice of the United Nations, leaders of various countries only speak for a quarter of an hour. However, it happened that this American president had to speak for 57 minutes, setting a record for all previous American presidents to speak at the UN General Assembly.
The content was even more exciting: one moment he scolded the United Nations for "empty talk", the next moment he boasted that he had "ended seven wars", and the next moment he scolded the mayor of London (because this person scolded him last year).
A good multilateral stage, hard to become a personal show scene. No wonder the netizens joked: "I can really joke," "In the past, the vocabulary has affected his free play!"
While Trump's complaints have not yet dissipated, Colombia President Petro pushed the plot to another climax.This dear man is nice, not sitting in the meeting room, Instead, he ran to the square outside the UN headquarters and held a loudspeaker to participate in the pro-Palestinian *.
Peter cried out to the crowd: Call on U.S. soldiers to violate Trump’s orders and obey human orders.”and even They threatened to form a military stronger than the U.S. to “liberate Palestine.”
Such a divine operation is rare in the diplomatic field. It's like going to someone's house as a guest, but calling on servants to rebel in the living room.To dare to be outspoken in the territory of the host country, the United States, is simply a bear's heart and leopard's gall.
Ironically, at the same time that Petro was shouting at the United Nations building, U.S. delegates were talking closely with allies about increasing military support for Israel.
The U.S. was a coward, the counterattack came quickly and shamelessly, and in the middle of the night announced on social media the revocation of Petro’s visa, with the pretext of the crown prince: “incitement to violence.”
What's even more ridiculous is that the United States actually deliberately @ each other, just like a quarrel between netizens. As everyone knows, Petro was already sitting on the plane back to China at that time, showing his Italian nationality with his backhand: "I don't need a US visa at all."
This drama is like a showdown between two people. One has just pulled out a watermelon knife and wanted to shop, while the other has jumped into a taxi and drifted away. Petro said: “The headquarters of the United Nations should not remain in New York, but should be moved to a more democratic place.”
Good guy! This is beautifully said, like a loud slap in the face of the United States. When it comes to visa revocation, the United States has taken "host privilege" to a new level.
Under the 1947 United Nations Headquarters Agreement, the United States has an obligation to ensure that representatives from all countries participate smoothly.
You ask why Petro was being targeted, nothing more than he announced in May last year that Colombia had broken relations with Israel, denouncing Netanyahu’s “genocide” in Gaza.
At this session of the United Nations General Assembly, he again jumped out and pointed out that Trump was a "genocide complicit", forcing American representatives to leave the seat.The United States and Israel wear the same pants, the whole world knows, but no one dares to blame Trump.
To be as straightforward as Peter would naturally invite revenge. It’s like when a child suddenly cries out the truth in the Emperor’s new clothes march, “Look, the Emperor doesn’t wear clothes,” so that people don’t want to clean up your clothes.
When Petro left, he proposed the United Nations to relocate, and people immediately cheered that China would be the "biggest winner."Chinese Internet users are keen to choose which city. Some people say Beijing, others say Shanghai and Guangzhou。
The above is purely wishful thinking. In this dilapidated building of the United Nations, the elevators are often broken and the arrears are not paid. It has to deal with lewd tenants like the United States every day. It is a hot potato.
The relocation requires the agreement of two-thirds of the members of the UN General Assembly, only the construction of facilities and legal linkage will have to break the ten-billion-level investment, and more to face the centralized shock of various global contradictions.。 How can China look for trouble and take the initiative to take over this "hegemonic legacy"?
Looking at this drama, I can’t help but think of Li Qing accusing Chinese literature of being “little foot literature” – wrapped up by traditional clothes. Why is the United Nations today not like that?
In the final analysis, the farce of the UN General Assembly is a mirror: Trump complained about the elevator, but forgot that he still owed the property fee; The United States revoked Petro's visa and lost the underpants of international law. Although Petro's street shouting was impulsive, it debunked the hypocrisy of "America first".
As for whether the United Nations will move or not, there is a high probability that it will be empty talk in the short term, but this debate at least shows that no matter how overbearing the "world father" is, he cannot bear to be "isolated" by the whole world.