The Chinese side is preparing to fight, and the United States is forcing China to pay a fine, the opening price is $ 175 billion, Wang Yi anti-general one army!
Let's talk first. In March this year, a court in Michigan suddenly popped up and said that China would pay US$24.5 billion because China "blocked the export of medical supplies during the epidemic," resulting in the deaths of many people there.
Hearing this reason, I really didn't know whether to laugh or cry. You have a mess in the United States, and you want to blame others? Does the whole world have your back garden?
Even more intriguing, they also threatened that if China did not give money, they would seize our assets in the United States.This is not blackmail?
Unfortunately, today's China, has long been not that good-talking China in the past. Wang Yi Foreign Minister directly stands out, if the U.S. pressure, we will definitely counter!
To put it bluntly, this wave of America just wants to touch porcelain. Their own law, the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act, clearly states that other countries' government assets cannot be seized casually.
Now well, it's time for China, they don't recognize themselves first.This is not a double goal what?You take the law as a tool, how you want to use it, and how to use it, this game can confuse your own people.
From the perspective of international law, this move of the United States is simply untenable. Countries are equal. Where does your local court have the face to dictate other governments? If the world follows your "America first" routine, why do you need the United Nations?
The funniest part is that the US courts say they are using "long arm jurisdiction". What do you mean? That is, as long as you get involved with me, I can handle you. Does this logic sound like a hooligan?
Can China also say that if the United States interferes in the Taiwan Strait, we will also sue you for 1 trillion yuan with a "long arm"? The world really wants to play like this, it's all messed up.
In fact, everyone knows that the real purpose of this move by the United States is to suppress China. Look, in recent years, when is the United States not making trouble? Chip ban, tariff overweight, various blacklists, and now a "fine" is a new trick, and the routine is flying.
But the question is, how much medical supplies did China send to the U.S. at the time of the epidemic? 438.5 billion light masks were exported, and a billion protective clothes were also exported.
You said we "catch your goods"?If you did not rely on Chinese rescue equipment, fear that the bodies had no ground.
Michigan's medical system had collapsed, the vaccine chaos, the distribution of materials was messy, and the pot was thrown out to others, this scalp was too thick, right?
Even the data of the United States' own CDC says that Michigan's mortality rate has always been higher than the national average, and the problem is obviously yourself.
In September, the Ministry of Commerce launched an anti-discrimination investigation into U.S. chip policies, followed by an anti-dumping duty of 78.2%* on Corning’s exports of fiber products from China.
What do you mean? you want to shake China’s wool? then let’s block your way! and that’s just the beginning. China has made it clear that there will be more censorship, restriction, and even withdrawal of U.S. companies.
If you dare to move our assets, we’ll make it difficult for you to move into the Chinese market and see who’s worse off.
The current approach of the United States has been seen through by everyone. They use the banner of "rules", but they do the work of bandits. They talk about "cooperation" and "openness", but behind them are various sanctions and threats.
In this game, the United States originally wanted to rely on the court to play a "legal card" to force China to the negotiating table and make a mistake.
China not only failed, but instead took a set of combined fist, from law to trade, from diplomacy to industrial layout, all-round counterattack.
More importantly, this time China demonstrated the counter-capacity, is completely different from before. initiative strike, say to do. and the United States? on the one hand want to curb China's development, and on the other hand not to shy away from the Chinese market, to the right is difficult, into retreat is unreasonable.
This storm is actually another microcosm of the Sino-US game. You want to use rules as a weapon? Then we'll tear down your rules and start over. You want to use hegemony to suppress others? Then we will tear down your sign face to face.
China is no longer the country that feared things a few decades ago.Now we have a backdrop, we have means, we have friends, and we have a clear strategic direction.
Let's talk first. In March this year, a court in Michigan suddenly popped up and said that China would pay US$24.5 billion because China "blocked the export of medical supplies during the epidemic," resulting in the deaths of many people there.
Hearing this reason, I really didn't know whether to laugh or cry. You have a mess in the United States, and you want to blame others? Does the whole world have your back garden?
Even more intriguing, they also threatened that if China did not give money, they would seize our assets in the United States.This is not blackmail?
Unfortunately, today's China, has long been not that good-talking China in the past. Wang Yi Foreign Minister directly stands out, if the U.S. pressure, we will definitely counter!
To put it bluntly, this wave of America just wants to touch porcelain. Their own law, the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act, clearly states that other countries' government assets cannot be seized casually.
Now well, it's time for China, they don't recognize themselves first.This is not a double goal what?You take the law as a tool, how you want to use it, and how to use it, this game can confuse your own people.
From the perspective of international law, this move of the United States is simply untenable. Countries are equal. Where does your local court have the face to dictate other governments? If the world follows your "America first" routine, why do you need the United Nations?
The funniest part is that the US courts say they are using "long arm jurisdiction". What do you mean? That is, as long as you get involved with me, I can handle you. Does this logic sound like a hooligan?
Can China also say that if the United States interferes in the Taiwan Strait, we will also sue you for 1 trillion yuan with a "long arm"? The world really wants to play like this, it's all messed up.
In fact, everyone knows that the real purpose of this move by the United States is to suppress China. Look, in recent years, when is the United States not making trouble? Chip ban, tariff overweight, various blacklists, and now a "fine" is a new trick, and the routine is flying.
But the question is, how much medical supplies did China send to the U.S. at the time of the epidemic? 438.5 billion light masks were exported, and a billion protective clothes were also exported.
You said we "catch your goods"?If you did not rely on Chinese rescue equipment, fear that the bodies had no ground.
Michigan's medical system had collapsed, the vaccine chaos, the distribution of materials was messy, and the pot was thrown out to others, this scalp was too thick, right?
Even the data of the United States' own CDC says that Michigan's mortality rate has always been higher than the national average, and the problem is obviously yourself.
In September, the Ministry of Commerce launched an anti-discrimination investigation into U.S. chip policies, followed by an anti-dumping duty of 78.2%* on Corning’s exports of fiber products from China.
What do you mean? you want to shake China’s wool? then let’s block your way! and that’s just the beginning. China has made it clear that there will be more censorship, restriction, and even withdrawal of U.S. companies.
If you dare to move our assets, we’ll make it difficult for you to move into the Chinese market and see who’s worse off.
The current approach of the United States has been seen through by everyone. They use the banner of "rules", but they do the work of bandits. They talk about "cooperation" and "openness", but behind them are various sanctions and threats.
In this game, the United States originally wanted to rely on the court to play a "legal card" to force China to the negotiating table and make a mistake.
China not only failed, but instead took a set of combined fist, from law to trade, from diplomacy to industrial layout, all-round counterattack.
More importantly, this time China demonstrated the counter-capacity, is completely different from before. initiative strike, say to do. and the United States? on the one hand want to curb China's development, and on the other hand not to shy away from the Chinese market, to the right is difficult, into retreat is unreasonable.
This storm is actually another microcosm of the Sino-US game. You want to use rules as a weapon? Then we'll tear down your rules and start over. You want to use hegemony to suppress others? Then we will tear down your sign face to face.
China is no longer the country that feared things a few decades ago.Now we have a backdrop, we have means, we have friends, and we have a clear strategic direction.