To what extent has the current game between China and the United States progressed? An article from 2 years ago seems to have revealed a corner of it to us. In 2023, Bloomberg took the initiative to quote an article, by PeggyIt is its author. This person is an American expert and has an authoritative position in the field of China issues.
According to his article, In 23 years, there are only two ways to set China in front of the world: either to fall to the head before the Great, or to destroy itself, apart from this, there is no other way.Of course, from today's perspective, the prophecy made by Pe is entirely wrong, but he is dependent on what to make such a judgment, and why our country can turn away from it, these two points are important.
The article was published in the context of Biden’s reign, when Brincoln was about to visit China on June 18, and his purpose was also to be on the table at the beginning – to talk about “some” situations in the future of China and the United States, such as the South China Sea, such as Taiwan. At that time, the U.S. military was upset at sea, and occasionally made provocative actions, against the increasingly upset United States, we naturally strengthened the strength and means of response, warning them that the bottom line issue was not allowed to negotiate.
Against the background of increasing tension, the international community began to speculate whether a war would really break out between China and the United States. There were even similar voices within both sides, so Blinken came to visit-in order to see our attitude and see if there was a possibility for both sides to sit down and discuss.
Of course, the author needs to mention here that the problem of whether a war breaks out has never been with us. The borderless attitude and arrogant practices of the United States are the main culprits, which makes them naturally not have an advantage in negotiations. Blinken naturally understood this point, so he needed to build momentum and give us some pressure before the negotiations began, so this article came into being.
Pei mentioned that we must accept the "military fence" policy proposed by the United States, which is actually a bit like dividing and ruling.In some regions, the United States needs to take control, while the rest of the region is handed over to us, so the wells do not breach the river water. But the question is, these so-called "regions", called "fence", are not on our territory?This is naturally unacceptable, but Pei warned that if not accepted, the future end will only be China-US relations gradually deteriorating, until the war like the Uranus, at the time, can we win the United States?
The article ended here, and Blinken also got the "momentum" he wanted. At that time, almost the whole world was discussing this matter. Once China and the United States went to war, it was no joke. However, to everyone's surprise, in the subsequent negotiations, we were not affected at all. It was as if we could not see the threat from the United States at all, and we stuck to the bottom line and refused to give in. American hawks have no idea what to do here. On the 18th, Blinken exposed his bottom line on his first day of visit-although he still seemed aggressive, he actually agreed to continue negotiations tomorrow!
Think about the previous U.S. attitude to fight war without accepting it, and we also clearly showed our attitude before negotiations. The bottom line issue could not be relegated, and as a result, Brinkon not only did not rush, but was willing to talk.Even if his attitude is not very good, it also exposes the fact that the United States also "needs" to negotiate, otherwise he could have left on the first day!
Our negotiators sharply captured this, and although Brinkon was also a good man, but there was no good way to hide this thing, and he, consciously exposed, changed his attitude and began to proactively cooperate, and the next day, the two sides reached a peaceful consensus, and a conflict was resolved. In July, the US Minister of Economy visited; in August, the Minister of Commerce visited, you see, militarily unstable, then start to consider the issue of cooperation – if we do not succeed in understanding the real idea of beauty, you say there will be a follow-up of this second-third visit?
It can also be seen from this point, the article mentioned in the previous article, in fact, in essence is for the moment, the many theories in it can not stand on foot, the power of the United States, and did not imagine the gap is so big. 23 years so, 25 years is more so. At the time we have a lot of new equipment has not been developed, whether it is now the hot "East Wind 61", drone lineup, or say the thrilling six-generation aircraft, Fujian ship, even the mysterious space army did not form at the time, now handshake God's weapons, we naturally do not fear.
Starting from the land, the "Minuteman 3" missile, which the U.S. Army claims to have arrived all over the world, has now encountered many problems due to its long service years. In 24 years, U.S. officials conducted a test launch to test the strength of their own "baby". Three test shots, one bullet, one launch failed, one navigation system failed.You say that even the most precious intercontinental missiles have so many faults, and the rest is going well?
Or let's get closer. In June this year, the "King of Understanding" held a birthday parade, hoping to cheer up the American people. As a result, many tanks on the scene made a tooth-piercing sound while moving. Obviously, this is due to poor maintenance and many things are rusty.
In this situation, we must not doubt, how much paper power still remains in the United States? their equipment, how many in a battle will be revealed? and the Air Force although not a lot of scandals, but the upper limit has almost been locked dead, Their six-generation aircraft are far from deadline, and “King” even needs to see “see it take off during the term” as their term slogan!
To know, one thing can become a slogan, which indicates that the difficulty of its realization is no longer common. but even if the "King of Knowledge" fulfilled the promise, it is only to stand back on the starting line with us – because our six-generation aircraft, in a few years, can really be officially served.
As for the last navy, let’s not look at the number of U.S. aircraft carriers leading, and even the nuclear aircraft carriers, but in the recent confrontation, they are not this side performance. At the end of May this year, we tried to shock the first island chain defense, as a result of its remaining aircraft carrier eyes looked at us approaching, after a moment of hesitation decided to retreat, and lived to let the land itself run for decades directly out.— — You see, is beautiful aircraft carrier does not dare to face fire, is their minds have concerns. so, what is the actual power contrast between China and America? believe you have the answers in your hearts.