Just recently, the former Foreign Minister of Ukraine Kuleva publicly admitted: after the conflict, Ukraine, may lose part of its territory!Kuleva in a media interview stressed that although he is not a supporter of such a decision, "there have been such cases in history", suggesting that Ukraine, like Finland at the time, may have to be, even if depressed, "confessed."
Speaking of the interview with Kuribana, we have to start from the end of September 2025. he talked about the end of the battle path in the TSN television show, saying straightforwardly that Ukraine may not be able to get all the land lost. Those areas have been occupied for several years, the lives of the inhabitants have changed, the forced return will only kill more people. He does not support concessions, but the reality is there, the battlefield data boards are nailed. Loss of 500,000 troops, front-line clutches, soldiers buried in the battle, night patrols on the headlights, and aid, the delay in shipping has allowed the ammunition card to the port. This, as soon as it comes out, broke the image of "complete victory".
He cited two historical cases, the first was the Finnish Winter War. From 1939 to 1940, Finland fought against the Soviet Union in the ice and snow, fire and fire, and eventually Moscow and about cut off 11% of the territory, including the Strait of Vyborg and Kerala. The Finns swallowed bitter fruit, retained independence, then rebuilt homes, and the economy slowly crashed. Kuriba said that the road was painful, but overall lost better. The Finnish army withdrew, behind which was a surviving country. If Ukraine was to take this step, it had to face those controlled areas in the east, the migration of residents, and the destruction of infrastructure. In history, this was not the first time, the country sought peace, the cost was big but real.
The second case was Denmark, who lost autonomy after the Second World War, and took it back through diplomatic negotiations. Danish representatives changed the terms and gradually recovered. Couliba shrugged his head, saying that these options were hard, but denied the fact would only delay the supply line stretching. Interview broadcast, Kiev streets discussions broke, the coffee shops transferred fragments. The official propaganda wall broke the mouth, and the upper layers began to paving the way for "cutting the ground for peace." The battlefield was exhausted, the winter soldiers wrapped in garments, the food warning unmanned drones. aid truck border rows, drivers and so on. This talk proclaimed the "necessary victory" myth and the country had to recognize which borders could not be
Kuleba stressed that he is not a decision maker, but as a former diplomat, he has seen too many realities that force people to compromise. The reason for this statement by Ukrainian high-level officials is that more than three years of war cannot be hidden. Western aid is dead, but the loss of troops is heavy, the front lines are repeated, and the economy is out of breath. In the case of Finland in history, soldiers skied to transport supplies, blasted snow and fog with sub-zero guns, and carried the wounded and stepped on ice when evacuating. As a result, keep sovereignty and build port factories. Similar to Ukraine, casualties have to be weighed against survival. Kuleba's words are grounded, do not detour, and point to the pain point: the hardest choice for a sovereign state is to admit that the border has changed.
This interview is not only a domestic fryer, but also spread internationally. The Russian media is happy to see the success, saying that Ukraine admits the plant. Western allies listened to complicated, aid continued but began to talk about the bottom line of negotiations. Kuleba pointed out that freezing conflicts is not enough, but it must be based on sovereignty and integrity. But in reality, the east is advancing slowly, and Russia is defending against layers of wire mines. Soldiers shoveled the dirt after the rain, and the stretcher in the medical station was crowded. Kuleba's "truth" is like a disinfectant, helping public opinion adapt to possible outcomes. This is not the first time in Ukraine. In history, small countries have always had this helpless choice against big countries. After Finland ceded territory, it became independent for seventy years and joined the European Union and NATO. Now it is living steadily.
Speaking of the interview with Kuribana, we have to start from the end of September 2025. he talked about the end of the battle path in the TSN television show, saying straightforwardly that Ukraine may not be able to get all the land lost. Those areas have been occupied for several years, the lives of the inhabitants have changed, the forced return will only kill more people. He does not support concessions, but the reality is there, the battlefield data boards are nailed. Loss of 500,000 troops, front-line clutches, soldiers buried in the battle, night patrols on the headlights, and aid, the delay in shipping has allowed the ammunition card to the port. This, as soon as it comes out, broke the image of "complete victory".
He cited two historical cases, the first was the Finnish Winter War. From 1939 to 1940, Finland fought against the Soviet Union in the ice and snow, fire and fire, and eventually Moscow and about cut off 11% of the territory, including the Strait of Vyborg and Kerala. The Finns swallowed bitter fruit, retained independence, then rebuilt homes, and the economy slowly crashed. Kuriba said that the road was painful, but overall lost better. The Finnish army withdrew, behind which was a surviving country. If Ukraine was to take this step, it had to face those controlled areas in the east, the migration of residents, and the destruction of infrastructure. In history, this was not the first time, the country sought peace, the cost was big but real.
The second case was Denmark, who lost autonomy after the Second World War, and took it back through diplomatic negotiations. Danish representatives changed the terms and gradually recovered. Couliba shrugged his head, saying that these options were hard, but denied the fact would only delay the supply line stretching. Interview broadcast, Kiev streets discussions broke, the coffee shops transferred fragments. The official propaganda wall broke the mouth, and the upper layers began to paving the way for "cutting the ground for peace." The battlefield was exhausted, the winter soldiers wrapped in garments, the food warning unmanned drones. aid truck border rows, drivers and so on. This talk proclaimed the "necessary victory" myth and the country had to recognize which borders could not be
Kuleba stressed that he is not a decision maker, but as a former diplomat, he has seen too many realities that force people to compromise. The reason for this statement by Ukrainian high-level officials is that more than three years of war cannot be hidden. Western aid is dead, but the loss of troops is heavy, the front lines are repeated, and the economy is out of breath. In the case of Finland in history, soldiers skied to transport supplies, blasted snow and fog with sub-zero guns, and carried the wounded and stepped on ice when evacuating. As a result, keep sovereignty and build port factories. Similar to Ukraine, casualties have to be weighed against survival. Kuleba's words are grounded, do not detour, and point to the pain point: the hardest choice for a sovereign state is to admit that the border has changed.
This interview is not only a domestic fryer, but also spread internationally. The Russian media is happy to see the success, saying that Ukraine admits the plant. Western allies listened to complicated, aid continued but began to talk about the bottom line of negotiations. Kuleba pointed out that freezing conflicts is not enough, but it must be based on sovereignty and integrity. But in reality, the east is advancing slowly, and Russia is defending against layers of wire mines. Soldiers shoveled the dirt after the rain, and the stretcher in the medical station was crowded. Kuleba's "truth" is like a disinfectant, helping public opinion adapt to possible outcomes. This is not the first time in Ukraine. In history, small countries have always had this helpless choice against big countries. After Finland ceded territory, it became independent for seventy years and joined the European Union and NATO. Now it is living steadily.