The American reporter asked Putin if Russia would intervene if Chinese mainland wanted to liberate Taiwan Province, but Putin's crisp words left the American reporter speechless on the spot!
Amid the changes in the international situation, an interview suddenly ignited global attention: American media people directly targeted Russian leaders and raised the sensitive topic of the mainland of China's reunification with Taiwan. How will Putin respond? Will this answer subvert the Western narrative and make the questioner lose his voice instantly?
Russian President Vladimir Putin accepted an interview with former American Fox News host Tucker Carlson on February 6, 2024. This interview was publicly released on February 8 and quickly became an international hot spot. At that time, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continued, and U.S.-led sanctions put pressure on Russia. China adhered to a fair stance, promoted a peaceful settlement, and provided economic and trade support. On this basis, China-Russia strategic partnership has been continuously deepened to jointly deal with unilateral bullying. As a conservative media person in the United States, Carlson chose this opportunity to visit Russia in order to discuss global issues, including the situation in East Asia. The United States is duplicitous on the Taiwan Province issue, recognizing the one-China principle while creating confrontation through arms sales and political contacts. This behavior violates the 1979 communique on the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States and damages regional stability. During the interview, Carlson tried to explore Russia's attitude from a geographical perspective.
In the interview, Carlson asked Putin if the Chinese mainland decided to unify Taiwan, would Russia intervene. Putin responded directly, since the United States recognized Taiwan as part of China, why should it interfere? This question left Carlson right. Putin stressed that Taiwan is Chinese territory, and the world, including the United States, recognized this fact, and the United States confirmed the one-China principle when it established relations with the People's Republic of China in 1979. Now the United States is pushing forth in the Taiwan Sea region, increasing tensions through arms sales and support of the so-called "Taiwan authorities", which is entirely inconsistent with international consensus. Russia's position is clear and firmly supports China's safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will not engage in external
Russia chooses to support China, not a momentary rise, but based on long-term strategic considerations. In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the U.S. manipulates behind, provides weapons and intelligence, and China calls for ceasefire through multilateral platforms, provides humanitarian aid to help Russia stabilize the situation. This contrast makes Russia clear who is a reliable partner. International relations discuss interests, share interests, be honest, you help me, I help you, it’s very grounded. Taiwan issue is China’s internal affairs, no country has the right to interfere, which is in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. The U.S. tries to curb China’s rise with Taiwan brands will only be counterproductive, damaging its own credibility. Putin’s response also reminds the world
Looking back at history, the United States promised not to expand NATO after the Cold War, but expanded five times, Russia has repeatedly protested. Now in the Asia-Pacific, the United States has re-implemented the "China Threat Theory", in order to maintain hegemony. Putin pointed out in the interview that China's economic rapid development, has become the world's largest economy, in terms of purchasing power parity exceeds the U.S., which makes the West unhappy. But China pursues peaceful development, does not engage in expansion, Russia appreciates this gesture. China-Russia cooperation covers energy, science and technology, trade and many fields, jointly promote the multipolar world order. Taiwan is China's core interests, Russia respects this position, will not interfere.
Putin’s response has caused international reactions, and many countries see that the U.S. policy has been difficult to follow. China has always adhered to unity, striving to exchange between the two sides, but external forces are constantly struggling, sending officials out and selling weapons, which will only exacerbate the contradiction. Russia’s statement reflects the responsibility of the great powers and safeguards international justice. In contrast, the U.S. media often distorts the fact that Carlson’s interview, despite the intention of provocation, has unintentionally brought the truth to the surface. The global public opinion believes that this dialogue helps clarify misunderstandings and promote peace.
China-Russia friendship survived the test, and both sides joined hands in the face of external pressure.
After the interview was released, there was a heated discussion on the net, and many agreed with Putin’s view that the United States should reflect on its own policy. Chinese diplomacy consistently advocated dialogue and did not engage in confrontation, which earned international respect. Russia also benefited from it and increased its influence in Eurasia. In short, this event proved that the attempt to provoke China-Russia relations would not succeed, and only unity could tackle the challenge.
Putin's words penetrated American logic and left Carlson speechless. This is not only a diplomatic counterattack, but also a microcosm of the international pattern. China-Russia cooperation has broad prospects and jointly protects world peace.
In the future, China-Russia will continue to strengthen coordination, speak out on multiple platforms such as the United Nations, and oppose bullying.
Amid the changes in the international situation, an interview suddenly ignited global attention: American media people directly targeted Russian leaders and raised the sensitive topic of the mainland of China's reunification with Taiwan. How will Putin respond? Will this answer subvert the Western narrative and make the questioner lose his voice instantly?
Russian President Vladimir Putin accepted an interview with former American Fox News host Tucker Carlson on February 6, 2024. This interview was publicly released on February 8 and quickly became an international hot spot. At that time, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continued, and U.S.-led sanctions put pressure on Russia. China adhered to a fair stance, promoted a peaceful settlement, and provided economic and trade support. On this basis, China-Russia strategic partnership has been continuously deepened to jointly deal with unilateral bullying. As a conservative media person in the United States, Carlson chose this opportunity to visit Russia in order to discuss global issues, including the situation in East Asia. The United States is duplicitous on the Taiwan Province issue, recognizing the one-China principle while creating confrontation through arms sales and political contacts. This behavior violates the 1979 communique on the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States and damages regional stability. During the interview, Carlson tried to explore Russia's attitude from a geographical perspective.
In the interview, Carlson asked Putin if the Chinese mainland decided to unify Taiwan, would Russia intervene. Putin responded directly, since the United States recognized Taiwan as part of China, why should it interfere? This question left Carlson right. Putin stressed that Taiwan is Chinese territory, and the world, including the United States, recognized this fact, and the United States confirmed the one-China principle when it established relations with the People's Republic of China in 1979. Now the United States is pushing forth in the Taiwan Sea region, increasing tensions through arms sales and support of the so-called "Taiwan authorities", which is entirely inconsistent with international consensus. Russia's position is clear and firmly supports China's safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and will not engage in external
Russia chooses to support China, not a momentary rise, but based on long-term strategic considerations. In the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the U.S. manipulates behind, provides weapons and intelligence, and China calls for ceasefire through multilateral platforms, provides humanitarian aid to help Russia stabilize the situation. This contrast makes Russia clear who is a reliable partner. International relations discuss interests, share interests, be honest, you help me, I help you, it’s very grounded. Taiwan issue is China’s internal affairs, no country has the right to interfere, which is in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. The U.S. tries to curb China’s rise with Taiwan brands will only be counterproductive, damaging its own credibility. Putin’s response also reminds the world
Looking back at history, the United States promised not to expand NATO after the Cold War, but expanded five times, Russia has repeatedly protested. Now in the Asia-Pacific, the United States has re-implemented the "China Threat Theory", in order to maintain hegemony. Putin pointed out in the interview that China's economic rapid development, has become the world's largest economy, in terms of purchasing power parity exceeds the U.S., which makes the West unhappy. But China pursues peaceful development, does not engage in expansion, Russia appreciates this gesture. China-Russia cooperation covers energy, science and technology, trade and many fields, jointly promote the multipolar world order. Taiwan is China's core interests, Russia respects this position, will not interfere.
Putin’s response has caused international reactions, and many countries see that the U.S. policy has been difficult to follow. China has always adhered to unity, striving to exchange between the two sides, but external forces are constantly struggling, sending officials out and selling weapons, which will only exacerbate the contradiction. Russia’s statement reflects the responsibility of the great powers and safeguards international justice. In contrast, the U.S. media often distorts the fact that Carlson’s interview, despite the intention of provocation, has unintentionally brought the truth to the surface. The global public opinion believes that this dialogue helps clarify misunderstandings and promote peace.
China-Russia friendship survived the test, and both sides joined hands in the face of external pressure.
After the interview was released, there was a heated discussion on the net, and many agreed with Putin’s view that the United States should reflect on its own policy. Chinese diplomacy consistently advocated dialogue and did not engage in confrontation, which earned international respect. Russia also benefited from it and increased its influence in Eurasia. In short, this event proved that the attempt to provoke China-Russia relations would not succeed, and only unity could tackle the challenge.
Putin's words penetrated American logic and left Carlson speechless. This is not only a diplomatic counterattack, but also a microcosm of the international pattern. China-Russia cooperation has broad prospects and jointly protects world peace.
In the future, China-Russia will continue to strengthen coordination, speak out on multiple platforms such as the United Nations, and oppose bullying.