Wen | Smile and drink

U.S. President Trump has declared that the U.S. military should revive the warships.

Russian nuclear-powered missile cruiser "Nashimov Navy Chief" before upgrading

Coincidentally, Xiaoyin discovered that Russia is resurrecting the nuclear-powered missile cruiser Admiral Nashimov, a "sea beast" loaded with a displacement of 25,000 tons. Although called a cruiser, but look at this body embryo, no less than the battleship of World War II.

This is all in the mid-20s of the 21st century, why did the US and Russia start to move the idea of cannon giant ships again?

Last week, Xiao Yin wrote an article specifically talking about the gradual reduction of the US military's configuration in terms of 10,000-ton large drive or 10,000-ton cruisers in the aircraft carrier formation.

However, looking at it now, China really doesn't have battleships, so what should we do? Should we also develop battleships?

1

"Why did the United States and Russia restart the giant artillery ships at the same time?"

Fans ask this question.

In fact, in Xiaoyin's opinion, it's nothing more than the word "clever"!

The so-called coincidence makes a book!

Actually well understood.

Russia restarted the "Admiral Nakhimov", which was used to scare people! After all, Russia currently has neither an available aircraft carrier nor a sufficient number of 10,000-ton cruisers or destroyers, so it feels unworthy of its status as a great power.

Front deck of missile cruiser "Moscow": China's military network

In the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, its 10,000-ton-class missile cruiser "Moscow" sank in the Black Sea, so far, no supplement. As for shipbuilding, in fact, Russia has never produced aircraft carriers alone in history. Of course, it has built more than seven thousand-ton destroyers, such as modern-class destroyers sold to China in the year. But today's Russia, half of the time will be difficult to build large surface ships alone, can build modern destroyers with a full discharge of five thousand tons, has been considered good.

In such circumstances, the plant repairs the "Nachimov Navy Chief" that had been in the river for a quarter of a century - more precisely, the re-exit, a pattern of bright muscle.

Unlike Russia, the manufacturing capacity of the United States is still very strong. At present, the United States is still building multiple aircraft carriers at the same time. Even if its 10,000-ton Ticonderoga-class cruiser is gradually retired, he is actually developing a new generation of surface ships. It's just that its development in this respect is not particularly smooth.

Should the United States really develop a warships?

2

Trump (right) speaks at the Naval Corps Base in Pattyko, Virginia, and supports U.S. Defense Secretary Hegerseth (left)

"I pay attention to aesthetics, and the current US warships are ugly!" This is what US President Trump said! On the morning of September 30th, local time, at the Marine Corps Base in Quantico, Virginia, USA, hundreds of U.S. military officers above the brigadier general level sat in rows to listen to Trump's words.

Is it possible that Trump especially likes the Eastern European or Slavic aesthetic of Russian warships?

Xiaoyin believes that it is really difficult to say that there is such a possibility!

Looking back at Trump's wives, they are all of Eastern European descent. Perhaps, Trump also has some favor for the aesthetics of Eastern European warships in his bones!

Canons and ships!

According to Trump's words: "We are considering the concept of'battleship '. The beautiful six-inch (about 152 mm) side is made of strong steel, not aluminum, not the kind that will melt once hit by a missile. Aluminum, the missile will start melting when it is about two miles (about three kilometers) away from us (that aluminum)."

What's more, although Trump is the president of the United States, that is, the commander-in-chief of the three armed forces of the United States, what he said at the Marine Corps base in Quantico is roughly his own view or opinion, rather than a decision after scientific analysis and decision-making.

U.S. Air Force Gen. Bishr resigns: information

U.S. Special Operations Command Commander Fenton resigns

After the official meeting, U.S. Air Force Gen. Thomas Bisil, Army Four Star Gen. and Special Operations Commander Brian Fenton, resigned.

This demonstrates the U.S. military¡¯s attitude toward Trump, as well as Defense Secretary Hughes, a Fox News host.

At present, it is reported that the Republican establishment in the US Congress is putting pressure on:

Some Republican lawmakers criticized Hagerseth for "leading the expert" and asked Trump to appoint a more professional defense chief.

Traditional officers are concerned that politized reforms are weakening combat, and middle-level officers have jointly called for "preserving the professionalism of the army".

The development of the U.S. Zumwalt-class destroyer is not smooth. Figure: Information

At that time, Trump¡¯s claim to build a warships was simply a call for personal aesthetic needs, or was there really a move? if no one in the US military supported him at the moment, would Trump have the ability to form his own military base, as well as a military base?

Trump is not a spokesman for the U.S. Military Industry Group or the Jewish Capital Group in the traditional sense. He himself is a wealthy trader. The question is whether he and his team¡¯s capital can directly build a warshipship, or is it possible that he will transfer the profits to the U.S. Military Industry Group?

It always feels like Trump said this time that the United States does not have to be ready to rebuild a new generation of warships.

U.S. Armed Forces Class Ships: Information

3

So what did you do with this year¡¯s artillery ship?

Times are different!

Now, when Trump declares to build a battleship, how should China feel?

Always feel, no need to feel anything!

Don¡¯t always think that the United States wants to develop what weapons, we have to follow.

We make our own strategic planning and develop our own military equipment. During this period, we can learn from the achievements of all advanced human militaries, including the United States. In particular, the U.S. military is indeed one of the strongest militaries in the world, including the U.S. military design and manufacturing fields, which we can learn from. But "learning" is not "copying"!

The USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier battle group, the Ticonderoga-class missile cruiser guarding the aircraft carrier (2, center, right) is gradually retiring. Picture: China Military Network

Our navy is strong to the sea chart, from defending the motherland's waters and borders, safeguarding the integrity of the country's territorial sovereignty, to "wherever the national interests reach, the ship's track must be reached". It can be said that we have our own plans and path choices for what kind of people's navy we will build in the future and how to use it to maintain world peace.

We can study Trump's whim, but we don't have to copy it!

Explanation of copyright

All platform writings of the publisher shall not be reproduced, published, modified, or carried out other acts related to the copyright of the publisher without official authorization.