Wen | Smile and drink
U.S. President Trump has declared that the U.S. military should revive the warships.
Lonely puppet, laughing to find that Russia is reviving full drainage2.5Ten thousand tons of "sea beast""Admiral Nakhimov" nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser。Although called a cruiser, but look at this body embryo, no less than the battleship of World War II.
This all21The Century20In the middle of the century, why did the United States and Russia start to move the idea of cannon giant ships?
I laughed last week.Military|The important ship type of the U.S. aircraft carrier formation is less than that of China 055!Specifically speaking of the 10,000-ton jet or 10,000-ton cruisers in the aircraft carrier squad, the U.S. military deployment is gradually reducing.
However, looking at it now, China really doesn't have battleships, so what should we do? Should we also develop battleships?
1
"Why did the United States and Russia restart the giant artillery ships at the same time?"
Fans ask this question.
In fact, in laughter, there seems to be no one.The word “choc”.
The so-called coincidence makes a book!
Actually well understood.
Russia restartsThe "Admiral Nakhimov", that's to scare people! After all, Russia currently has neither an available aircraft carrier nor a sufficient number of 10,000-ton cruisers or destroyers, so it feels unworthy of its status as a great power.
At the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, its 10,000-tonThe missile cruiser "Moscow" sank in the Black Sea, so far, no addition. As for shipbuilding, in fact, Russia has never produced aircraft carriers alone in history. Of course, it had built destroyers with a full-loaded discharge of more than seven thousand tons, such as the modern-class destroyers sold to China in the year. But today's Russia, one and a half hours will be difficult to build large surface ships alone, can build modern destroyers with a full-loaded discharge of five thousand tons, has been well calculated.
Under such circumstances, a quarter of a century of maintenance has been in the factoryThe return of the Admiral Nashimov-or more accurately, the return to sea-is a muscle-shining pattern.
Unlike Russia, the manufacturing capacity of the United States is still very strong. At present, the United States is still building multiple aircraft carriers at the same time. Even if its 10,000-ton Ticonderoga-class cruiser is gradually retired, he is actually developing a new generation of surface ships. It's just that its development in this respect is not particularly smooth.
Should the United States really develop a warships?
2
“I’m aesthetic, now the U.S. military ship has exploded!” said President Trump.9month30In the morning in the United States.VirginiaMarine Corps Base QuanticoHundreds of U.S. military officers above brigadier general sat in line and listened to Trump say this.
Is it possible that Trump especially likes the Eastern European or Slavic aesthetic of Russian warships?
Xiaoyin believes that it is really difficult to say that there is such a possibility!
Looking back at Trump's wives, they are all of Eastern European descent. Perhaps, Trump also has some favor for the aesthetics of Eastern European warships in his bones!
Canons and ships!
According to Trump:“We’re considering the concept of a ‘war ship’. beautiful six inches (about152On the millimeter side, using solid steel instead of aluminum, not the kind of aluminum that will melt once hit by a missile, the missile will begin to melt when we are about two miles away (about three kilometers).
What's more, although Trump is the president of the United States, that is, the commander-in-chief of the three armed forces of the United States, what he said at the Marine Corps base in Quantico is roughly his own view or opinion, rather than a decision after scientific analysis and decision-making.
After the meeting, the U.S. Air Force CommanderThomasByzel, Army Four Star Commander, Special Operations Command Commander Brian Fenton, resigned one after another!
This demonstrates the U.S. military’s attitude toward Trump, as well as Defense Secretary Hughes, a Fox News host.
At present, it is reported that the Republican establishment in the US Congress is putting pressure on:
Some Republican lawmakers criticized Hagerseth"Laymen lead experts" require Trump to appoint a more professional defense chief.
Traditional military officers are concerned that political reforms will weaken combat, and there has been a joint appeal by middle-level officers."Maintaining military professionalism".
At that time, Trump’s claim to build a warships was simply a call for personal aesthetic needs, or was there really a move? if no one in the US military supported him at the moment, would Trump have the ability to form his own military base, as well as a military base?
Trump is not a spokesman for the U.S. Military Industry Group or the Jewish Capital Group in the traditional sense. He himself is a wealthy trader. The question is whether he and his team’s capital can directly build a warshipship, or is it possible that he will transfer the profits to the U.S. Military Industry Group?
It always feels like Trump said this time that the United States does not have to be ready to rebuild a new generation of warships.
3
So what did you do with this year’s artillery ship?
Times are different!
Now, when Trump declares to build a battleship, how should China feel?
Always feel, no need to feel anything!
Don’t always think that the United States wants to develop what weapons, we have to follow.
We make our own strategic planning and develop our own military equipment. During this period, we can learn from the achievements of all advanced human militaries, including the United States. In particular, the U.S. military is indeed one of the strongest militaries in the world, including the U.S. military design and manufacturing fields, which we can learn from. but"Learning" is not "copying"!
Our navy is strong towards the sea chart, from defending the motherland's waters and borders, safeguarding the integrity of national territorial sovereignty, toIt can be said that in the future, how we will build the people's navy, how we will use it to maintain world peace, we have our own plans and path choices.
We can study Trump's whim, but we don't have to copy it!