On October 4, 2025, Japan ushered in a historic moment. The Liberal Democratic Party's presidential election came to an end. The winner was not a moderate in the traditional sense or a technocrat known for being pragmatic, but a woman with a tough stance and a distinctive style-Takashi Zaomiao.
She will become Japan's first female prime minister after the war. This was supposed to be a major event that symbolized a gender breakthrough, but the focus of the international community was not on her gender, but on the political stance behind her.
Even the United States, which has always fought side by side, seems a little uneasy this time. Not because Japan changed its prime minister, but because Japan elected her.
She wants to "untie" but the United States is not at ease
Cao市早苗 is not a new face, and as long as she was the Minister of Economic Security, she frequently appeared in the news because of hard speeches.
She climbed this time not by moderate compromise, but by a flagrant right-wing stance.
This style is not uncommon in Japanese politics, but her “clear” and “insistence” indicate that she is not following the traditional route, but wants to play a larger angle on the steering wheel.
She disagrees with the post-war Japanese “peace model”, especially with the restrictions in the constitution.
She believes that Japan should no longer be “bound in the framework of the past”, which is good to say is to normalize the country, to speak directly, is to give Japan more military options.
These restrictions were precisely designed by the United States to prevent Japan from embarking on the path of militarism again.
The United States certainly knows what she thinks and what they mean.
A Japan that is no longer willing to be constrained may not only move forward in regional affairs, but may also no longer fully obey U.S. strategic arrangements at a critical moment.
For the United States, the once-controlled "ally role" is loosening, which is no small problem.
What she thinks of China and what she does is the key
Judging from her past remarks and political stance, it is almost a consensus that her attitude towards China is not friendly. She always emphasizes "national security first", and her definition of "security" is often directly linked to China.
She believes that China is "an object that needs to be guarded against" and supports strengthening security cooperation with the United States, India, Australia and other countries, obviously viewing China as a competitor or even a potential threat.
In her eyes, the Taiwan issue is no longer a “distant foreign affair” but a “strategic issue” directly related to Japan’s interests.
This position breaks Japan’s long-standing ambiguity on the Taiwan issue and turns closer to the strategic calibre of the United States.
Her actions are not just a political gesture, but more likely to have substantial implications at the policy level. Whether it is an increase in defense budgets or deepening military cooperation, it can lead to further tensions between China and Japan.
In this atmosphere, less trust between the two countries will become less, and the risk of misjudgment will increase.
However, it is worth noting that China's foreign policy consistently advocates stability and restraint, and for such "provocative statements" by the Japanese side, more important is substantial action.
In other words, what the high market said is one thing, and what is really done is the key.
She is not so stable at home.
Although she has become prime minister, politics is not a stage where one person has the final say. There are many factions within the Liberal Democratic Party, and Takashi Saami is not the most powerful one among them.
This election is not an overwhelming victory that swept the audience, but a compromise product after many forces pulled each other.
Her ability to win depends heavily on temporary support from key factions, which could turn around at any time.
In other words, her party foundation is not solid, which means that she will be subjected to various constraints during the ruling process, wanting to advance her own policy, and must also deal well with relations with other forces within the party.
Especially in Japan, which emphasizes balance and harmony, a leader with an overly prominent style and an overly extreme stance often finds it difficult to go far.
Moreover, her policy claims are not uncontroversial among the people.The Japanese society has always had a complex attitude towards topics such as “revision of the constitution” and “expansion of the army”.
While some support her tough stance, many fear that this will lead to greater conflict in the country.
In addition, there is another practical problem that has to be mentioned-the Japanese economy. At present, Japan's economic growth is weak, financial pressure is increasing, and the structural problems caused by aging are becoming increasingly prominent.
If she invests too much in security policy, ignoring economic reforms and improving people’s livelihoods, she is likely to lose voter support.
There will be no shortage of external challenges
If the domestic situation is enough for her to have a headache, then the external environment will only become more complicated. The current international situation is not stable, and the unpredictability of U.S. policies is both pressure and test for Japan.
Especially after the change of government in the United States, its attitude towards its allies has become stronger and it requires Japan to shoulder more responsibilities, whether militarily or economically.
The new prime minister must find a balance between "maintaining relations with the United States" and "protecting Japan's own interests." It's not easy.
On the one hand, her position on the United States has always been close, emphasizing that the Japan-US alliance is the "cornerstone of national strategy"; on the other hand, the new requirements of the United States are often highly interest-oriented and are likely to damage Japan's domestic industry and economic structure.
If she promises too much, she will be accused of "the only life is from"; if she refuses too much, it may affect the atmosphere of cooperation between Japan and the United States.
At the same time, other Asian countries are also keeping an eye on her next move. Her words and deeds are likely to trigger a chain reaction of the regional situation.
Especially in sensitive areas such as the South China Sea and the East China Sea, any small move can be amplified, thereby affecting the security pattern of the entire region.
Judging from the current situation, Gao Shizao's coming to power is more like a historical accident than a political necessity. Although her tough style has attracted the support of some conservative voters, it has also brought many concerns and questions.
Is she going to “go out” with Japan or “go back”?
In a country like Japan with a mature system and diverse public opinion, no policy can be achieved overnight.
Changes she wants to push, such as constitutional amendments, military expansion, and historical reconstruction, require broad consensus and long-term pattern.
What's more, she has to face various restrictions in reality: the bottleneck of economic growth, the pressure of social security, the adjustment of energy structure, and the tension of labor market...
Each of these problems is more difficult than the other and cannot be solved by just a few slogans.
Her challenges come not only from the outside, but also from within. She needs to prove that she can not only speak hard words, but also solve hard problems.
And once she loses her dominance on these key issues, her political life may be shorter than anyone else.
conclusion
The election was a sign of changes in Japanese politics. She represents not just a person, but a more conservative and emphasizing the will of the country political direction. This trend is gradually affecting Japan's internal affairs and diplomacy, and is also re-shaping Japan's position on the regional and international stage.
It is necessary for China to pay enough attention to this change, but there is no need to over-interpret it. What we need to see clearly is her actual actions, not her verbal statements; We are judging how far she can go, not where she wants to go.
The game between major powers has never been based on who has the loudest voice, but on who has a strong foundation and is stable in chess. No matter how much Japan's political trend turns, it is impossible to deviate from the track of reality. In reality, China's comprehensive strength, stable development, and maturity of foreign policies are the key variables that truly determine the regional pattern.
So, for the female prime minister who “must worry about America,” you have to see both her position and her limits.The world is changing, the pattern is changing, but coolness and judgment can never change.