The Ukrainian battlefield reached a critical moment, and the situation on the battlefield in northern Donetsk was no different for Ukraine. The Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Silsky moved his forces in the direction of Zaporozhye, Helsinki and Sumy to Pokrovsk (City of the Red Army) and Konstantinovka (Constantinovka of the Don), and concentrated the elite forces of the two brigades of the First Army of the Azov to fight for the outpouring of Dubrovnik. Because it was the last line of defense of the Dnipropetrovsk province, it was safe for the Ukrainian army to go to the west.

Now Kiev and the Ukrainian military, sincerely hoping that NATO and the European Union can directly drop off, rather than stand on the sidelines.TG social platform Russian blogger said that Kiev is eager to change the situation on the Donbass battlefield, so continuously in the territory of NATO member states such as Poland, Romania to create "fake flag incidents" (referring to these countries suffered the so-called Russian drone "invasion" incident).

Surprisingly, however, not only has NATO Article 5 not been activated, but even the activation of NATO Article 4 (a collective discussion mechanism for sudden security threats) has become a "taboo" for the United States and Europe. Prior to this, major EU countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Germany also threatened to form a "European peacekeeping force" to send troops to Ukraine, but it quickly proved to be "loud thunder but little rain." In the final analysis, none of these NATO countries are willing to take the lead in jumping into the fire pit. What's more, what they need to face is Russia, the second largest military power in the world. It can be said that there is no chance of winning at all.

In an interview with BBC, British Space Command commander Paul Tedman said Russia was ¡°deeply concerned¡± about the continued interference and tracking of British military satellites. Britain currently has only six military satellites operating in orbit, carrying out communications and surveillance missions. Paul Tedman noted that ¡°we note that Russia frequently interferes with our satellites¡±, although British satellites are equipped with anti-interference technology, they are still ¡°almost every week¡± interfered by Russia and can not work properly.

The only six military reconnaissance satellites in the UK have been normalized, meaning the entire space reconnaissance system of the British military has been paralyzed. Someone will ask if Britain can counter-attack and simultaneously interfere with Russian satellites? but it¡¯s easy to say it¡¯s hard to do, because Russia and the United States have a large aerospace power, and there are hundreds of reconnaissance satellites in orbit. There¡¯s no doubt that this time the British military reconnaissance satellite has been ¡°closed,¡± which is a lesson for Russia¡¯s space power to NATO member states collectively.