When the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out, Merkel, the former German Chancellor, once said that the biggest loser in this conflict may be Europe. Unexpectedly, however, three years later, it turned out to be a prophecy.

What is even more worrying is that the current EU may not only be the biggest loser in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but is also more likely to become the biggest loser in the Sino-US game.

Europe is the biggest loser.

In the eyes of many people, the EU is a whole, and Europe is one of the best economies in the world. But in the current game between major powers, the EU has become the smallest one and even the most unfavorable one.

The former European Union, hoping to have an equal right to dialogue with the United States in order to fight against the United States, was founded, but unfortunately, the present European Union also defeated the European Union.

Why do you say this? The core reason is that the EU seems to have a large economy, but it is scattered. More importantly, not only are the interests within the EU unbalanced, but more importantly, the current interests of various countries are diametrically opposed, which is for the whole. It is very fatal.

Compared with China and the United States, the EU has no efficient mobilization efficiency. At the same time, more importantly, China and the United States can achieve the trinity of economy, politics and military. Can the current EU achieve it?

Obviously, the EU can't do it. Compared with China, the United States and Russia, the EU's empty economy can't pose a threat, and compared with smaller countries, the EU is not flexible enough. Because the interests of all parties must be concerned, but how many opportunities does the EU still have at the moment of great changes unseen in a hundred years?

Moreover, everyone can see that the United States wants to cut off the economic and energy ties between the EU and Russia through the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and also wants to consume the EU through war, thereby forcing the EU to pay tribute to the United States. On the other hand, the EU is forced to de-industrialize through industrial subsidy policies and tariff sticks.

But what is the EU doing? However, the EU is busy with infighting and even taking action against China. Because in the EU's view, all this is caused by China. As long as sanctions are imposed on China on steel and other products, EU companies can survive. At the same time, taking action against China can force China not to trade with Russia, thus making Russia collapse rapidly.

Because in the European Union, as long as China does not do business with Russia, then Russia will not have to cross more than a month, and then the conflict with Ukraine will not end, and the EU will not be so difficult.

It can only be said that the EU is thinking too much at the moment. To know that countries are currently looking for their own ecological place, while the EU is still busy fighting with the three countries of China and Russia. and China and the United States to fight a tariff war, and Russia to die in military conflict, it can only be said that the EU is too affordable.

And as everyone knows, the current United States has long stopped mentioning any ideology, because the United States knows that the current world is looking at who is strong. The so-called warmth must also have common interests. Are the interests of the European Union and the United States consistent at present?

In fact, it is not consistent. In the past, the Soviet Union and the United States turned a blind eye, and finally the euro appeared, which allowed the EU to seize the opportunity. In the current Sino-US game, will the United States let the EU seize the opportunity again and become bigger?

Obviously impossible, and now China and the United States have indirectly reached a consensus that there will be no military conflict, which means that confrontation between major powers is obviously impossible.

Then for other countries, suddenly taking sides, taking sides and taking sides and playing games at this time would be suicidal. And for the EU, China wants mutual benefit, while the United States wants clean food.

Now the EU is neither willing to fully contribute to the United States, nor can it cooperate with China to resist the harvest of the United States. The final result is that it will be besieged and suppressed by three parties.

At present, it may be just the beginning. After all, the EU still has a certain economic foundation. What's even more troublesome is that with the economic downturn, the immigration problem in Europe will inevitably break out. At that time, can the EU keep it?