Who would have thought that an air battle would completely reshuffle the pattern of South Asia? In front of global representatives at the United Nations, the Prime Minister of Pakistan personally tore off India's fig leaf-not six, but seven fighter planes were blasted into scrap metal! What stands behind it is the ruthless crushing of Chinese fighter planes and combat systems.
Observer Network reported that at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz told the story of the conflict between India and Pakistan in May this year in front of more than 100 countries, mainly mentioning three points:
First, the Pakistani Air Force blasted seven Indian fighter jets into garbage iron, he said, “The enemy came with arrogance, but withdrew.”
Second, four days after the conflict, the two sides agreed to a ceasefire, thanking Trump for his "positive role" and thanking China and Iran for their diplomatic support.
Third, he stressed that Pakistan is prepared and willing to engage in a comprehensive and effective dialogue with India on all unresolved issues.
The whole statement pointed to the truth of the India-Pakistan air battle on May 7.
India took the lead in launching "Operation Sindour" in an attempt to tear open the Pakistani defense line with legal "Rafale" fighter jets. As a result, it was penetrated by the Pakistani army's "Iron Wall" operation.
Initially, the Pakistani military announced the shooting down of six enemy aircraft (including drones), now Shabaz personally covered "7", and one more was the "wind" that was abolished after the return - allegedly equipped with the J-10CE PL-15E missile, which eventually became irreparable debris.
In fact, India loses not in the performance of its fighter jets, but in the generation gap in its combat system.
Pakistan has woven the J-10CE, ZDK-05 early warning aircraft and ground radars into a sky net to achieve a seamless connection of "the eye of the early warning aircraft, the nerve of the data link, and the fist of the missile."
The British "Air Force Monthly" revealed the key point: the J-10CE's airborne radar independently guides the Thunderbolt-15 missile to complete the hunting without the intervention of early warning aircraft. This over-the-horizon strike mode makes the "gust" with excellent stand-alone performance like "blind fighting".
The sharpness of the J-10CE reflects the subversive breakthrough of Chinese military industry.
In the past, the West monopolized the high-end fighter market for a long time, and "Made in China" was often labeled as a "cottage". However, this 7: 0 record not only shattered the myth of "invincible gust", but also gained trust and endorsement for the Chinese equipment export model-what China sells is no longer a single weapon, but a complete set of combat ecology.
Pakistan expressed its special gratitude to China for its diplomatic support at the United Nations, suggesting that behind this victory is the profound empowerment of China-Pakistan strategic cooperation.
In contrast to India, the fleet of Su-30MKI, Rafale and Glory may seem luxurious, but lacks systematic coordination.
The Indian military pilots were lost in electromagnetic interference and even failed to effectively lock on to the Palestinian target. What's even more ironic is that after India's disastrous air war defeat, it announced that "Rafale shot down China missiles" and planned to spend US$22.6 billion to purchase an additional 114 Rafale aircraft.
Experts ridicule this as "repairing a grass boat with gold." They don't know that modern air combat is no longer a simple matter of building weapons.
For the "truth" revealed by the Pakistani side, the live footage captured the face of India's first-class secretary, Gallot Tejing, who in her defense hurriedly criticized Pakistani claims as "absurd theatrical performances", while once again denying Pakistan's victory in the conflict.
She could only rely on the saying that "if the runway is damaged, it is a victory, then Pakistan can also say the same", which is pale and powerless.
It is worth noting that India's international status has been hit by the war.Multi-national military has included the air war in the teaching materials and considered it a "systematic air war classic case."
India tried to use "winning learning" to bolster its respect, but it was treated coldly by the United States in areas such as tariff negotiations.
The Trump administration originally wanted to borrow India to put pressure on Pakistan in exchange for the presence of military codes, and the Indian army was unnecessarily used, forcing the United States to turn to talk about the layout of Afghanistan.
Just as netizens joked: "The same generation of machines will play 7:0, and they will not escape the label of being beaten in the next 20 years."
In the UN General Assembly, Chabaz threw a double signal of “peace, but more courage to fight”: on the one hand, emphasizing “dispute resolution through dialogue” and on the other, warning “provocative leadership will bury regional stability.”
This strategy of both soft and hard has just exposed India's strategic dilemma-it is difficult to break through the defenses of the Pakistani military system militarily, and its diplomatic credibility is damaged due to defeat.
In the future, the Indo-Pakistan warfare will turn more to the hybrid warfare.
India may accelerate defence cooperation with France, Israel, and Russia to try to remedy the system shortcomings; Pakistan is expected to deepen its integration with China in areas such as early warning command and electronic warfare, while China needs to be alert to India’s risk shift pressure on border issues.
An air war crashed not only aircraft, but also myths and prejudices.When the J-10CE used the force to write the answer 7:0, the world finally saw that the air war has long gone beyond the scope of a border conflict, but revealed the rise of Chinese equipment, the fading of Western myths, and the loosening of an old hegemonic order.
And if India continues to be addicted to the vanity of “paper data”, there will probably be more “UN breakdown moments.”