At the moment, Hamas has announced its acceptance of a portion of the ¡°20 points plan¡± and is ready to start negotiations on other aspects. US President Donald Trump has also expressed a positive opinion on this and asked Israel to stop its bombing of Gaza.

The US side is actively expressing its aim to shape the success story of the mediator.

Assistant researcher of the China Institute for International Affairs:In fact, the positive statement made by Hamas this time was not to fully accept the "20-point plan" previously proposed by Trump, but to accept some of the contents of the "20-point plan" and be willing to cooperate with Israel on other terms. Communication and negotiation, which is a certain gap from what the United States and Israel previously required.

Because both the "20-point plan" and other ceasefire plans proposed by the United States and Israel earlier require Hamas to provide feedback in an all-or-nothing manner, which means that the relevant plan is actually an ultimatum and is not for further negotiations with Hamas.

After Hamas gave the current feedback, U.S. President Trump immediately made a very positive statement and asked Israel to stop its bombing of Gaza.This approach is basically not about Trump¡¯s confidence in Hamas or a long-term ceasefire in the future, but simply about shaping a story of his own success.A follow-up to a ceasefire whether either party refuses to implement the agreement, or other breaks in the process of implementing the agreement, as for Trump, can put the responsibility for the failure on the other side.

The differences between Hamas and Israel remain obvious

Assistant researcher of the China Institute for International Affairs:While Hamas agreed to release all the remaining detainees, it still demanded that Israel meet certain prerequisites, which are also a key part of future negotiations between Israel and Hamas under the mediator¡¯s regulation.

Then to Israel¡¯s most concerned demands, Hamas¡¯ demands for disarmament, Hamas made it clear that if Israel did not end the occupation, Hamas would not disarm. In terms of these specific technical details, Hamas¡¯s substantive compromise and retreat is not much.

The implementation prospects of the "20-point plan" are not optimistic

Assistant researcher of the China Institute for International Affairs:Under such circumstances, the prospect of whether Israel will agree to Hamas's request is still relatively pessimistic. In addition, Israel's current supervision plan for Gaza City is also in full swing. From a technical point of view, Israel is unlikely to give up control of Gaza City, let alone comprehensively reduce or abandon the construction of the military security transition zone in Gaza. plan. On these issues, the positions of Hamas and Israel have so far been extremely sharply opposed.

So in general, although President Trump has given a relatively positive conclusion, the most ideal state for now is to implement the ceasefire in advance and start exchanging the remaining detainees. As for other details, it is possible to negotiate on the sidelines of the ceasefire agreement. But there is still a great likelihood that it will be implemented shortly after the agreement, because various breaks lead to the breakup of the agreement, the resumption of the conflict, so the outlook for the implementation of the "20-point plan" is actually not optimistic.