China's pit for the U.S. this time is too big to dig the foundation of American deterrence.
Ambassador Geng Shuang showed his cards directly at the United Nations, saying that "the United States will not withdraw its nuclear weapons abroad, and nuclear disarmament will be free from talks." As soon as this words landed, it was even more difficult for the West to sit still than the rare earth stuck neck. After all, the rare earth card is the lifeblood of the industry, and the nuclear deployment is the foundation for the United States to be the "world policeman".
At the high-level meeting of the United Nations General Assembly on September 26, local time, Genghisong's words did not turn around: not only to remove the nuclear bomb, but also to stop the deployment of "Tifong" in the Asia-Pacific, and to abolish the old rules of NATO's "nuclear sharing".
This is not just shouting slogans casually. China has directly poked the finger at the fate of the US deterrence system. The United States claims to be able to cover its allies by hiding nuclear bombs in other people's homes, and then using "extended deterrence" to draw a big pie. Now that China wants to lift the table, this pie will naturally be exposed.
How many nuclear bombs are hidden outside the United States? Although the number is not clearly reported, NATO's "nuclear sharing" is no secret. In the air bases of non-nuclear countries such as Belgium and Germany, dozens of American nuclear warheads are placed there, and even the fighter planes of these countries are allowed to hang bombs to perform missions.
This clearly steps on the red line of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The NPT states in black and white that nuclear powers cannot directly or indirectly transfer nuclear control. To put it bluntly, this operation by the United States is a "borrowing chicken to lay eggs" type of nuclear proliferation.
In the past, everyone turned a blind eye, but now China has thrown evidence on the United Nations table. If the United States wants to use "nuclear disarmament" as a stick to beat others, it must first see if its hands are clean.
More seriously, China has accurately struck on the "internal and external contradictions", the European allies are completely difficult: on the one hand, Germany, the Netherlands and these countries have long since protested "their own territory of the Tibetan nuclear bomb, is the same as putting the target at the door", the anti-nuclear wave has not stopped; on the other hand, they do not dare to tear the face with the United States. after all, also pointed to "extended deterrence" as a safety umbrella.
Mao Ning pointed out before that the essence of this arrangement is to "tie allies to chariots." Now that China has pressed the palace, the quarrel within Europe has become even more fierce: to ensure security, we must keep nuclear bombs, and to comply, we must drive the United States away. No one can afford to offend it.
The United States just wanted to move Europe's "nuclear sharing" to the Asia-Pacific, China's direct illumination of the attitude "do not be allowed to replicate". Japan and South Korea do not say in the mouth, the heart is clear: the American nuclear bomb really invited, is equivalent to China's "priority target".
What is even more embarrassing is the nuclear submarine cooperation between the United States, Britain and Australia. Geng Shuang directly accused it of "violating the purposes of the NPT," which is tantamount to exposing the double standards of the United States. Who will believe it when you secretly engage in nuclear proliferation and in turn accuse others of "destabilizing"?
The United States' own days are not better, its nuclear deterrence seems to be shameful, in fact it is all supported by the "Allied Standing" and the "double standard".Now China holds the NPT as a scale, the United States either withdraws the nuclear bomb and loses the confidence of its allies, or does not withdraw and seats the "nuclear proliferation culprit" status.
Even better, China didn't target anyone alone, but turned "nuclear disarmament to check the United States first" into an international consensus. Among the 191 NPT contracting parties, many countries have long been dissatisfied with the double standards of the United States, and now they just borrow China's words to make a sound.
In the past, the United States always loved to pull its allies into a "nuclear deterrence alliance" and used nuclear bombs as the reins to control its allies. Now that China is serious, this rein has restrained the United States itself: European allies are beginning to back down, and Asia-Pacific countries are afraid to accept nuclear bombs, which is even legally untenable.
Geng Shuang's words seem tough, but in fact they point out the paper tiger essence of American deterrence. The so-called "global protection" is nothing more than a selfish calculation to pass on risks to others.
This trick is more bright than simple counter-reaction, the rare earth is the neck of the card industry chain, the nuclear disarmament issue is the foundation of deterrence.If the United States does not withdraw, it becomes the "barrier stone" of nuclear weapons control; the true withdrawal, the ally system must be scattered.
No wonder Western media are eager to shout "China is changing the rules of the game." In fact, it is not that the rules have changed, but that China has finally put the tricks hidden by the United States behind the rules into the sun.
In the end, nuclear deterrence this thing, the most fearful is more true. previously the United States was confused by vague statements, now China directly drawn the red line, the so-called "deterrence base" instantly became hot potatoes.
This pit was not excavated, it was the United States itself slowly excavated by double targets and hegemony, China was only slightly pushed. after all, in front of international law, a stronger nuclear bomb must also speak of the rules.
Ambassador Geng Shuang showed his cards directly at the United Nations, saying that "the United States will not withdraw its nuclear weapons abroad, and nuclear disarmament will be free from talks." As soon as this words landed, it was even more difficult for the West to sit still than the rare earth stuck neck. After all, the rare earth card is the lifeblood of the industry, and the nuclear deployment is the foundation for the United States to be the "world policeman".
At the high-level meeting of the United Nations General Assembly on September 26, local time, Genghisong's words did not turn around: not only to remove the nuclear bomb, but also to stop the deployment of "Tifong" in the Asia-Pacific, and to abolish the old rules of NATO's "nuclear sharing".
This is not just shouting slogans casually. China has directly poked the finger at the fate of the US deterrence system. The United States claims to be able to cover its allies by hiding nuclear bombs in other people's homes, and then using "extended deterrence" to draw a big pie. Now that China wants to lift the table, this pie will naturally be exposed.
How many nuclear bombs are hidden outside the United States? Although the number is not clearly reported, NATO's "nuclear sharing" is no secret. In the air bases of non-nuclear countries such as Belgium and Germany, dozens of American nuclear warheads are placed there, and even the fighter planes of these countries are allowed to hang bombs to perform missions.
This clearly steps on the red line of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The NPT states in black and white that nuclear powers cannot directly or indirectly transfer nuclear control. To put it bluntly, this operation by the United States is a "borrowing chicken to lay eggs" type of nuclear proliferation.
In the past, everyone turned a blind eye, but now China has thrown evidence on the United Nations table. If the United States wants to use "nuclear disarmament" as a stick to beat others, it must first see if its hands are clean.
More seriously, China has accurately struck on the "internal and external contradictions", the European allies are completely difficult: on the one hand, Germany, the Netherlands and these countries have long since protested "their own territory of the Tibetan nuclear bomb, is the same as putting the target at the door", the anti-nuclear wave has not stopped; on the other hand, they do not dare to tear the face with the United States. after all, also pointed to "extended deterrence" as a safety umbrella.
Mao Ning pointed out before that the essence of this arrangement is to "tie allies to chariots." Now that China has pressed the palace, the quarrel within Europe has become even more fierce: to ensure security, we must keep nuclear bombs, and to comply, we must drive the United States away. No one can afford to offend it.
The United States just wanted to move Europe's "nuclear sharing" to the Asia-Pacific, China's direct illumination of the attitude "do not be allowed to replicate". Japan and South Korea do not say in the mouth, the heart is clear: the American nuclear bomb really invited, is equivalent to China's "priority target".
What is even more embarrassing is the nuclear submarine cooperation between the United States, Britain and Australia. Geng Shuang directly accused it of "violating the purposes of the NPT," which is tantamount to exposing the double standards of the United States. Who will believe it when you secretly engage in nuclear proliferation and in turn accuse others of "destabilizing"?
The United States' own days are not better, its nuclear deterrence seems to be shameful, in fact it is all supported by the "Allied Standing" and the "double standard".Now China holds the NPT as a scale, the United States either withdraws the nuclear bomb and loses the confidence of its allies, or does not withdraw and seats the "nuclear proliferation culprit" status.
Even better, China didn't target anyone alone, but turned "nuclear disarmament to check the United States first" into an international consensus. Among the 191 NPT contracting parties, many countries have long been dissatisfied with the double standards of the United States, and now they just borrow China's words to make a sound.
In the past, the United States always loved to pull its allies into a "nuclear deterrence alliance" and used nuclear bombs as the reins to control its allies. Now that China is serious, this rein has restrained the United States itself: European allies are beginning to back down, and Asia-Pacific countries are afraid to accept nuclear bombs, which is even legally untenable.
Geng Shuang's words seem tough, but in fact they point out the paper tiger essence of American deterrence. The so-called "global protection" is nothing more than a selfish calculation to pass on risks to others.
This trick is more bright than simple counter-reaction, the rare earth is the neck of the card industry chain, the nuclear disarmament issue is the foundation of deterrence.If the United States does not withdraw, it becomes the "barrier stone" of nuclear weapons control; the true withdrawal, the ally system must be scattered.
No wonder Western media are eager to shout "China is changing the rules of the game." In fact, it is not that the rules have changed, but that China has finally put the tricks hidden by the United States behind the rules into the sun.
In the end, nuclear deterrence this thing, the most fearful is more true. previously the United States was confused by vague statements, now China directly drawn the red line, the so-called "deterrence base" instantly became hot potatoes.
This pit was not excavated, it was the United States itself slowly excavated by double targets and hegemony, China was only slightly pushed. after all, in front of international law, a stronger nuclear bomb must also speak of the rules.