China has once again reminded that it hopes that the Security Council will pay close attention to this action, strictly supervise it, and take necessary actions in time according to the development of the situation.

Wen| Haishangke

¡°This is China¡¯s greatest goodwill,¡± said China¡¯s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Fujin.

September 30th United Nations Security Council Meeting: Xinhua news agency video

It happened on September 30th, local time. According to the reference news report, the UN Security Council met at that time to vote on the draft resolution on suppressing Haitian gang forces.

The draft was adopted.

And then Foucault spoke like that!

1

The uncle had to say that in the Security Council want to pass a resolution, it is actually not so difficult!

After all, the United Nations Security Council has 15 votes, the most important of which are five votes from permanent members of the Security Council.

If you vote, of course, you have to rely on a simple majority. If there are more votes in favor, it will pass; if there are more votes against, it will not pass.

The five permanent members have a veto right.

Specific to the suppression of Haitian gang forces, 12 votes in favor and 3 abstentions!

Who is the abstainer?

China, Russia, Pakistan.

Pakistan, the so-called ¡°Barthe¡±, as the current non-permanent member of the Security Council, has stood on the same side as China during its term of office.

Russia, as well as China, is a permanent member of the Security Council.In this vote, Russia stands in the same position as China.

Obviously, this resolution on suppressing the Haitian gang forces, China did not vote against.

That is why Resolution 2793 was passed, namely, the United Nations decision to convert the Haiti Multinational Security Assistance Corps into a repressive gang force.

You know, as long as China votes against it, it can veto this "transformation" with one vote.

But in the end, China abstained from voting, which was equivalent to "releasing" the resolution.

China's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Fujin made an explanatory speech on September 30 after the Security Council voted on a draft resolution on suppressing Haitian gang forces, expressing concern about the operation and prospects of the force.

2

Having abstained from voting, why would Foucault have to express a lot of Chinese views?

He believes that this is to let the international community understand where this is wrong!

You know, China doesn't use its veto power much in the UN Security Council. I always feel that this is a kind of Chinese temperament! Everything is easy to discuss. Come through discussion. Unlike some countries, which regard the one-vote veto power as a natural hegemony, they often take the world's disapproval and unreasonably veto the relevant contents of issues with overwhelming advantages in the UN General Assembly when discussed in the Security Council.

What China pays attention to is to assess the situation.

China has no diplomatic relations with Haiti.

The link is that Haiti and the Taiwan authorities have so-called "state relations", and during its civil unrest even incurred related persons to the Taiwan authorities' agencies in Haiti to hide such absurd things.

But China still looks at Haiti from an international perspective.

Reports show that from July 2024 to February 2025, 4,239 people have been killed and 1,356 injured in Haiti, 92% of which were caused by gun violence. Gangs attack schools, hospitals, courts, and use sexual violence to control communities. In addition, kidnapping cases have surged, and more than 700 people have been hijacked. Photo: CCTV News Client

Looking back in history, China has not voted against the Security Council in Central America.On January 10, 1997, the People's Republic of China vetoed the draft resolution of the Security Council on sending United Nations military observers to Guatemala.The reason is simple: Guatemala and the Taiwan authorities at the time had "state relations".In the eyes of China, Guatemala was not a place worth spending too much effort and money by the United Nations.

Why should that be?

Just with a chaotic energy?

There are many chaotic places in the world. Why not invest money and human resources where they are needed more?

For this reason, for some time, although Haiti has also been in chaos, China does not believe that this is an important place worthy of concern.

Especially for China.Haiti is well or bad, and it has little to do with us.

Since we also pay the membership fees on a regular basis, and there are not many payments, why should we send resources to places that have little to do with us?

For example, can Haiti first "break" relations with the Taiwan authorities? its so-called "Bondage" with the Taiwan authorities is China that is not rooted in the eyes as one of the five constants.

When the vast majority of countries in the world recognize that there is only one China in the world, and the government of the People¡¯s Republic of China is the only legitimate government representing China, is Haiti still thinking about the benefits of relying on the Taiwan authorities?

Of course, the current situation in Haiti is chaotic. Haiti still has a lot to go from chaos to governance.

In this process, he sincerely hopes that he will soon go to the right path of domestic diplomacy. Otherwise, he can only regret his unhappiness. If he falls into the wrong path again, it is dangerous!

Colombia President Petro

With Colombia in Central America, its president, Pedro, recently ordered the withdrawal of Colombian diplomats from the embassy in China, and accused them of undermining relations with China.

It can be seen that many countries in the world attach great importance to their relations with China. There are not many countries like Haiti that deal with relations with China!

3

Specifically, look at Fujin¡¯s interpretation of Resolution 2793.

Fu Cong said,

the draft resolution which members of the force are composed of,

How to fulfill authorization,

How to grasp the boundaries of the use of force,

It is ambiguous on key issues such as how to avoid the casualties of innocent civilians.The implementing country, however, insisted on requiring the Security Council to pass the resolution first.This requires the Security Council to issue empty checks on issues related to the safety of the Haitian people's life, but without specific responsibility, is no different than to view the Security Council as a "rubber stamp".

Fu Cong specifically mentioned that China, Russia and others hope to extend the technical extension of the multinational security support mission to gain more time for full discussions and seek consensus. However, the author country still submitted the draft for voting.

"The draft resolution may aggravate the already complex and severe situation in Haiti. The growing power of gangs in Haiti is inseparable from the continuous flow of large amounts of weapons and ammunition into Haiti. United Nations reports show that weapons and ammunition originating from the United States have never been cut off, and the Security Council's arms embargo has become a dead letter. This contradictory approach of allowing weapons to flow into the hands of gangs while promoting the dispatch of armed forces to fight in the sea is likely to plunge Haiti into greater security turmoil." Fu Cong said this, expressing his concern about the severe situation in Haiti.

But what about the bad situation?

Isn't it caused by the forced push of the United States?

On May 2, 2024, in Port Prince of Haiti, in the midst of ongoing criminal violence, residents walk through a burnt car as they evacuate from the Delmas 22 community after an attack.

Anyway, Haiti is close to the United States and far from China. Don't blame China for not warning if anything goes wrong.

In fact, China has once again reminded that it hopes that the Security Council will pay close attention to this action, strictly supervise it, and take necessary actions in time according to the development of the situation.