I feel that Ukraine is in danger, and it is likely that Russia will use nuclear weapons to solve Ukraine, because without nuclear weapons, the bottom line of nuclear weapons has been broken, without nuclear weapons, Putin has no way to convey to the Russian people!
To put it bluntly, the core of discussing whether Ukraine is in danger now is not whether it has won in the conventional battlefield, but whether Russia will really move out its nuclear weapons. However, if we think about this matter more deeply, we cannot avoid the old principle of "food and grass come first before soldiers move", let alone the red line of nuclear weapons that will lead to eternal destruction if they are touched.
Let's first think about a real question. Is Russia really unable to find Ukraine's ammunition production base and overseas transportation lines?
In fact, Ukraine's own large ammunition plant was previously bombed, and now ammunition is mostly transported by NATO from the border countries of Poland and Romania.
These transportation lines are hidden quite cleverly. They don't often take major roads, but only choose small rural roads and branch railways. Sometimes they are mixed in civilian truck fleets, covered in the cloak of "transporting agricultural products" and "building materials", and they can't be distinguished without careful checking.
What's even more troublesome is that NATO also helps to keep track. Satellites monitor the movements of Russian fighter planes and missiles, and send early warnings to Ukraine whenever there is trouble. By the time the Russian missiles fly past, the transport convoy has already taken a detour.
Before Russia did have several railway bridges, highway hubs, can not deal with the line too dispersed, to explode one, not a few days and can gather another, if it can really cut these "grain grass lines" completely, the conventional resistance of Ukraine has long failed, where to use to trick nuclear weapons? so not to find, is to break clean too hard, this is also the key to the conventional battlefield has been glued.
Let's talk about the move of nuclear weapons. Some people think that Russia can't explain it to the people without nuclear weapons, but if it really uses it, the consequences are a hundred times more serious than "unable to explain it".
Over the past 20 years, Putin has made solid achievements, from stabilizing the Russian economy, turning the energy card into a trump card, to gaining a firm foothold in Syria and making Russia a "weighty" role on the international stage again.
But once nuclear weapons are used first, the sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council can push Russia into a corner, and countries that have made good friends with them before have to draw a clear line quickly. The international community's spittle can drown people, and more than 20 years of efforts are in vain.
Not to mention, those who use nuclear weapons are destined to become criminals of history. These weapons are not conventional bombs. With one bomb, a city may be lost and thousands of civilians will be killed. No one dares to think about it until their country is on the verge of being destroyed.
Even if Ukraine is fighting now, it will not be enough to destroy Russia itself. There is no need to make such a desperate move. The most terrifying thing is that once Russia starts this way, will other nuclear-armed countries encounter conflicts in the future, and will they also think of "throwing nuclear weapons to save trouble, but why would they fight a conventional war?" If this is the case, the world will be completely chaotic, and no one will ever want to live a peaceful life.
And the most important thing to mention is that the Ukrainian people are innocent, the latest news, there are still millions of civilians displaced in Ukraine, some hiding in the basement, it is difficult to eat hot food, some with children fled to Poland, Germany, not even a fixed home.
When nuclear weapons explode, the streets of Kiev or the small villages of the east will instantly become ruins, and the old people, the children, the ordinary working people, who have done nothing wrong, why should they endure this disaster?
Russia has always said that it is "protecting civilians". If it really uses nuclear weapons, this statement will be completely untenable. From a humanitarian point of view, this is simply unjustifiable.
In fact, the way to solve the problem doesn't have to rely on fighting. As the old saying goes, "Why don't let him be three feet?" Taking a step back is not to be cowardly, but to reduce casualties and destruction.
If Ukraine relaxes on some key issues, such as the status of the eastern region and its security commitment to Russia, Russia may also be willing to withdraw its troops.
After all, Russia wants security, not really to deal with Ukraine, in turn, if Russia stops and leaves a mouth for negotiations, Ukraine will not be hard on it.
In the final analysis, there is no real winner in the war. Either both sides take a step back to find a balance point, or both sides lose and drag on.
Do you think Ukraine and Russia can really find the opportunity to "give up three feet"? In other words, does anyone really dare to step on the red line of nuclear weapons? Let's talk about your opinions in the comment section.
To put it bluntly, the core of discussing whether Ukraine is in danger now is not whether it has won in the conventional battlefield, but whether Russia will really move out its nuclear weapons. However, if we think about this matter more deeply, we cannot avoid the old principle of "food and grass come first before soldiers move", let alone the red line of nuclear weapons that will lead to eternal destruction if they are touched.
Let's first think about a real question. Is Russia really unable to find Ukraine's ammunition production base and overseas transportation lines?
In fact, Ukraine's own large ammunition plant was previously bombed, and now ammunition is mostly transported by NATO from the border countries of Poland and Romania.
These transportation lines are hidden quite cleverly. They don't often take major roads, but only choose small rural roads and branch railways. Sometimes they are mixed in civilian truck fleets, covered in the cloak of "transporting agricultural products" and "building materials", and they can't be distinguished without careful checking.
What's even more troublesome is that NATO also helps to keep track. Satellites monitor the movements of Russian fighter planes and missiles, and send early warnings to Ukraine whenever there is trouble. By the time the Russian missiles fly past, the transport convoy has already taken a detour.
Before Russia did have several railway bridges, highway hubs, can not deal with the line too dispersed, to explode one, not a few days and can gather another, if it can really cut these "grain grass lines" completely, the conventional resistance of Ukraine has long failed, where to use to trick nuclear weapons? so not to find, is to break clean too hard, this is also the key to the conventional battlefield has been glued.
Let's talk about the move of nuclear weapons. Some people think that Russia can't explain it to the people without nuclear weapons, but if it really uses it, the consequences are a hundred times more serious than "unable to explain it".
Over the past 20 years, Putin has made solid achievements, from stabilizing the Russian economy, turning the energy card into a trump card, to gaining a firm foothold in Syria and making Russia a "weighty" role on the international stage again.
But once nuclear weapons are used first, the sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council can push Russia into a corner, and countries that have made good friends with them before have to draw a clear line quickly. The international community's spittle can drown people, and more than 20 years of efforts are in vain.
Not to mention, those who use nuclear weapons are destined to become criminals of history. These weapons are not conventional bombs. With one bomb, a city may be lost and thousands of civilians will be killed. No one dares to think about it until their country is on the verge of being destroyed.
Even if Ukraine is fighting now, it will not be enough to destroy Russia itself. There is no need to make such a desperate move. The most terrifying thing is that once Russia starts this way, will other nuclear-armed countries encounter conflicts in the future, and will they also think of "throwing nuclear weapons to save trouble, but why would they fight a conventional war?" If this is the case, the world will be completely chaotic, and no one will ever want to live a peaceful life.
And the most important thing to mention is that the Ukrainian people are innocent, the latest news, there are still millions of civilians displaced in Ukraine, some hiding in the basement, it is difficult to eat hot food, some with children fled to Poland, Germany, not even a fixed home.
When nuclear weapons explode, the streets of Kiev or the small villages of the east will instantly become ruins, and the old people, the children, the ordinary working people, who have done nothing wrong, why should they endure this disaster?
Russia has always said that it is "protecting civilians". If it really uses nuclear weapons, this statement will be completely untenable. From a humanitarian point of view, this is simply unjustifiable.
In fact, the way to solve the problem doesn't have to rely on fighting. As the old saying goes, "Why don't let him be three feet?" Taking a step back is not to be cowardly, but to reduce casualties and destruction.
If Ukraine relaxes on some key issues, such as the status of the eastern region and its security commitment to Russia, Russia may also be willing to withdraw its troops.
After all, Russia wants security, not really to deal with Ukraine, in turn, if Russia stops and leaves a mouth for negotiations, Ukraine will not be hard on it.
In the final analysis, there is no real winner in the war. Either both sides take a step back to find a balance point, or both sides lose and drag on.
Do you think Ukraine and Russia can really find the opportunity to "give up three feet"? In other words, does anyone really dare to step on the red line of nuclear weapons? Let's talk about your opinions in the comment section.