Recently, U.S. President Donald Trump presented the latest peace plan, which appears to be pushing the end of the war in Gaza on the surface, but is actually more like dividing Gaza in the dark with Israel. The plan requires Hamas to drop its weapons and leave Gaza, and a U.S.-led team to manage Gaza, and intends to have former British Prime Minister Blair as chairman of the team.

In response, Trump threatened that Netanyahu had agreed to the agreement and that if Hamas did not accept the plan, the United States would ¡°fullly support¡± Israel¡¯s continued military operations in the Gaza Strip. The move was soon strongly opposed by Hamas and the people of Gaza and called for amendments to the plan. However, according to the news agency, Israeli media that Israel and U.S. officials were reluctant to accept ¡°significant changes¡± to the proposal as Hamas was considering responding to the Gaza ceasefire.

A senior U.S. official told the media that while the U.S. is willing to negotiate limited changes, such as the timetable and details of the Israeli withdrawal or the concrete process of Hamas¡¯ disarmament, it ¡°will not accept fundamental changes¡±.In addition, there are Israeli sources who say that Israel supports this framework, but that ¡°no negotiations can be made¡± other than technical issues.

Obviously, this is another typical manifestation of the United States' use of regional hegemony to favor Israel. Not only do the Gaza people disagree, but Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed also said in an interview on the same day that Trump's "20-point plan" to end the Gaza conflict still needs clarification and negotiation. Obviously, Arab countries in the Middle East are also dissatisfied with this. Of course, neither the Palestinian Authority nor the Arab countries in the Middle East, despite their dissatisfaction with the United States' biased behavior, may not be able to prevent the United States and Israel from carving up Gaza.

Of course, in the Middle East Arab world, not only are Saudi Arabia and Iran unwilling to face the United States, but also the Houthis armed who dare to declare war directly with the United States. The Houthis armed forces, which have always supported Hamas and have been hard-meeted by the United States, are determined to stand up. They are this time directly declaring war on the United States! According to news reports, in retaliation for the previous U.S. sanctions on Houthis armed individuals and entities, the Houthis armed 13 U.S. companies, nine executives and two ships, including oil giants such as ExxonMobil and Chevron.

Of course, the so-called ¡°sanctions¡± of the Houthi armed forces may differ from those of the Western countries. After all, they have no economic and diplomatic means to pay the cost of these ¡°sanctioned¡± U.S. companies and ships. Therefore, the so-called ¡°sanctions¡± of the Houthi armed forces should be a warning to the U.S. firms that they are targeted. In other words, as long as the ships of these sanctioned companies enter the range of Houthi armed missiles or drones, they will be attacked. From another perspective, the Houthi armed forces are publicly ¡°declaring war¡± to the U.S. and resuming attacks on U.S. ships that operate in the Red Sea.

The Houthi armed forces, called the world¡¯s number one superpower, were never ambiguous. The US declared war, immediately opened fire on the Red Sea vessels, and the first war was quick, what happened? On the morning of October 1, local time, Houthi armed spokesman Yehaya issued a statement saying that they used cruise missiles to attack a cargo vessel that violated its navigation ban.

Yahya did not specify which country the attacked cargo ship belonged to, but it should be related to Israel or the United States. At a time when tensions between the United States and Russia escalate and the United States is clamoring to kill Venezuela, the Houthi armed forces 'move is more like shouting "Fire at me" to Trump!

Obviously, the declaration of war by the Houthi armed forces could put the United States in a difficult situation: military retaliation against the Houthi armed forces, fear that they would be dragged into the dungeon of war as before, but if the US vessels continued to attack the Red Sea by the opponents, the face of the United States would be widened.