Do not underestimate the determination of the United States to start a war, now he did not start a war with China, because he has capital to support, but one day there is really no way to go, Old America is likely to be the first to shoot the "third world war" shrinkage.
Why would you say that? Many people may think that the United States is now full of problems. Whether it is inflation, debt crisis, or domestic political divisions, they all seem to be showing signs of decline. How can such a country have the confidence to launch a war?
These problems are indeed eye-catching, but to say that it can wipe out the bottom of its war, it is really to make America simple, on the contrary, the more internal contradictions the pot, the more likely the United States to take war as a "drog", this is not a rumor, it is its hundred years old route.
First of all, the most worried debt issue, now has broken $37 trillion, look scary? but the United States is not like other countries, it holds the dollar hegemony in its hands.
Simply put, it printed money and others acknowledged that the debt can be slowly devalued by the dollar, but can also make other countries follow the payment, you see the "big and beautiful" bill it just passed, while reducing taxes to the rich, while expanding spending, and knowing that it will owe hundreds of billions, dare to sign.
Why? Because although interest expenses exceed one trillion yuan every year, as long as you can borrow new ones and repay old ones, and as long as there are countries buying U.S. debt, this game can continue to be played.
The proportion of international holdings of U.S. debt has dropped, but it has not yet reached the point where no one wants to, the status of the dollar for the time being no one can replace, this is the bottom line of it dares to "debt money over the days", with the situation of the Soviet Union at the time.
Looking at the domestic political tear, Trump's supporters stormed Capitol Hill, and the two parties could cause the government to shut down for a trivial matter. On the surface, it was indeed falling apart.
But if you think carefully, you will find that no matter whether Republicans or Democrats, there are no differences in the matter of “strong external relations”, especially with China.
The more violent the right-wing populism, the more necessary to find a "external enemy" to gather people's hearts, when Roosevelt faced the Great Depression and domestic fascist thunderstorms, Pearl Harbor events came, and the whole country fought the Second World War; now the American poor and rich gap is growing, the richest families reduce taxes ten thousand a year, but the poor are to be cut from the welfare, this contradiction is not suppressed when, find an excuse to provoke conflict, shift the domestic anger, is simply the usual trick of American politicians.
This is not a guess, but a rule written in its history-war was used to resolve internal crises almost every 80 years, from the War of Independence to the Civil War to World War II, and now it is this cycle point.
More importantly, the U.S. has a “war business period” playing the fire, which the Soviet Union has never had.
The data of the Swedish research institute is there. Among the 100 largest arms dealers in the world, the United States accounts for 41, earning $317 billion a year from selling arms, accounting for half of the world's share.
Secretary of State Brinkon himself acknowledged that 90% of Ukraine's aid money was spent in the United States, ordered to military-industrial enterprises, and created high-paying jobs in 40 states.
Three-quarters sales increased by 6%, stock prices rose by 50%, and these military giants, along with Congress and the Pentagon, have long become "war interest groups".
The bosses of General Dynamics dare to say bluntly, "America can't fight without us." In this case, as long as there are signs of conflict, they will push the government forward. After all, fighting is giving them money.
The Soviet Union developed its military industry in order to compete with the United States for consumption, and finally dragged itself down; The United States is different. Its military industry is a money-making machine. The more it fights, the richer it gets. This motivation is much stronger than that of the Soviet Union.
Some say that the United States now fights everywhere, in fact, it fights "the battle of making money", and has long practised the actual thing of "spinning the edge".
It is not just to engage in a comprehensive war to call for war, as in Ukraine and the Middle East, to provide weapons, send advisors, engage in agents war, can both earn army money, but also to test the opponent, but not to face the big powers directly.
The reason why it hasn't taken serious action with China now is because it still has cards to play: the hegemony of the US dollar can also harvest global wealth, technology can still get stuck in our necks, and allies can gather together to contain them.
But what if these cards don't work? For example, de-dollarization is getting faster and faster, and the market value of China's military enterprises is rising one by one. They can fight head-on with them, and their debts have reached the point where they cannot be borrowed. At that time, they may really take risks.
Don't think that there will be no local conflict between the great powers, the United States is the best is to make small things bigger, from trade friction, scientific and technological blockade, slowly escalate, and finally challenge in some hot spot region.
Now it is engaged in military deployment in the Asia-Pacific region and pulling allies to engage in exercises, which is to make preparations. In those days, the Soviet Union's hard power couldn't keep up with its ambitions and collapsed. The United States turned war into an industrial chain and crisis into a business. This country's determination to go to war is much firmer than we thought.
Therefore, do not take the end of the Soviet Union with the United States, and do not be confused by its internal problems, its capacity to withstand far beyond the imagination of ordinary people, the debt can be diluted by the dollar, contradictions can be transferred by war, the military industry can make money by conflict, these things together, so that it in the "there is no way to go", it is really possible to ring the dangerous "shake the edge".
Why would you say that? Many people may think that the United States is now full of problems. Whether it is inflation, debt crisis, or domestic political divisions, they all seem to be showing signs of decline. How can such a country have the confidence to launch a war?
These problems are indeed eye-catching, but to say that it can wipe out the bottom of its war, it is really to make America simple, on the contrary, the more internal contradictions the pot, the more likely the United States to take war as a "drog", this is not a rumor, it is its hundred years old route.
First of all, the most worried debt issue, now has broken $37 trillion, look scary? but the United States is not like other countries, it holds the dollar hegemony in its hands.
Simply put, it printed money and others acknowledged that the debt can be slowly devalued by the dollar, but can also make other countries follow the payment, you see the "big and beautiful" bill it just passed, while reducing taxes to the rich, while expanding spending, and knowing that it will owe hundreds of billions, dare to sign.
Why? Because although interest expenses exceed one trillion yuan every year, as long as you can borrow new ones and repay old ones, and as long as there are countries buying U.S. debt, this game can continue to be played.
The proportion of international holdings of U.S. debt has dropped, but it has not yet reached the point where no one wants to, the status of the dollar for the time being no one can replace, this is the bottom line of it dares to "debt money over the days", with the situation of the Soviet Union at the time.
Looking at the domestic political tear, Trump's supporters stormed Capitol Hill, and the two parties could cause the government to shut down for a trivial matter. On the surface, it was indeed falling apart.
But if you think carefully, you will find that no matter whether Republicans or Democrats, there are no differences in the matter of “strong external relations”, especially with China.
The more violent the right-wing populism, the more necessary to find a "external enemy" to gather people's hearts, when Roosevelt faced the Great Depression and domestic fascist thunderstorms, Pearl Harbor events came, and the whole country fought the Second World War; now the American poor and rich gap is growing, the richest families reduce taxes ten thousand a year, but the poor are to be cut from the welfare, this contradiction is not suppressed when, find an excuse to provoke conflict, shift the domestic anger, is simply the usual trick of American politicians.
This is not a guess, but a rule written in its history-war was used to resolve internal crises almost every 80 years, from the War of Independence to the Civil War to World War II, and now it is this cycle point.
More importantly, the U.S. has a “war business period” playing the fire, which the Soviet Union has never had.
The data of the Swedish research institute is there. Among the 100 largest arms dealers in the world, the United States accounts for 41, earning $317 billion a year from selling arms, accounting for half of the world's share.
Secretary of State Brinkon himself acknowledged that 90% of Ukraine's aid money was spent in the United States, ordered to military-industrial enterprises, and created high-paying jobs in 40 states.
Three-quarters sales increased by 6%, stock prices rose by 50%, and these military giants, along with Congress and the Pentagon, have long become "war interest groups".
The bosses of General Dynamics dare to say bluntly, "America can't fight without us." In this case, as long as there are signs of conflict, they will push the government forward. After all, fighting is giving them money.
The Soviet Union developed its military industry in order to compete with the United States for consumption, and finally dragged itself down; The United States is different. Its military industry is a money-making machine. The more it fights, the richer it gets. This motivation is much stronger than that of the Soviet Union.
Some say that the United States now fights everywhere, in fact, it fights "the battle of making money", and has long practised the actual thing of "spinning the edge".
It is not just to engage in a comprehensive war to call for war, as in Ukraine and the Middle East, to provide weapons, send advisors, engage in agents war, can both earn army money, but also to test the opponent, but not to face the big powers directly.
The reason why it hasn't taken serious action with China now is because it still has cards to play: the hegemony of the US dollar can also harvest global wealth, technology can still get stuck in our necks, and allies can gather together to contain them.
But what if these cards don't work? For example, de-dollarization is getting faster and faster, and the market value of China's military enterprises is rising one by one. They can fight head-on with them, and their debts have reached the point where they cannot be borrowed. At that time, they may really take risks.
Don't think that there will be no local conflict between the great powers, the United States is the best is to make small things bigger, from trade friction, scientific and technological blockade, slowly escalate, and finally challenge in some hot spot region.
Now it is engaged in military deployment in the Asia-Pacific region and pulling allies to engage in exercises, which is to make preparations. In those days, the Soviet Union's hard power couldn't keep up with its ambitions and collapsed. The United States turned war into an industrial chain and crisis into a business. This country's determination to go to war is much firmer than we thought.
Therefore, do not take the end of the Soviet Union with the United States, and do not be confused by its internal problems, its capacity to withstand far beyond the imagination of ordinary people, the debt can be diluted by the dollar, contradictions can be transferred by war, the military industry can make money by conflict, these things together, so that it in the "there is no way to go", it is really possible to ring the dangerous "shake the edge".