If the trade war fails, will the United States choose to use force to destroy China? U.S. experts believe that if the United States loses this trade war, Trump will likely consider war options. Because war is a continuation of politics, considering that the opponent is China, the United States has little chance of winning with its current military strength, so Trump, who is good at calculation, is unlikely to take such a risk because it does not conform to his business thinking.
The average age of the U.S. Navy’s main force vessels has been more than 30 years, while the other side of China, the destroyer dropped in the past decade almost all the new Type 052D and Type 055.
It is not enough to compare the old and new warships. Modern warfare is about the system, especially the "anchoring needle" of nuclear power. The United States has nuclear warheads, and so does China. Moreover, the current counterattack capabilities are no longer what they used to be. Those underground fortifications in the northwest are longitudinal and horizontal. For thousands of kilometers, it is difficult to distinguish the authenticity of missile silos, and it is impossible for the United States to finish them in one pot.
There are nuclear submarines in the sea, quietly hidden in the depths of the ocean, carrying "big waves" missiles can hit more than 10,000 kilometers, even if the mainland is hit, these submarines can counteract.
Not to mention the Dongfeng-41 missile, whose range covers the mainland of the United States, and the split-guided multiple warheads cannot be stopped at all. American experts themselves have calculated that even if they launch 200 nuclear bombs first, we will have at least 10% of our strength left to fight back. If these 20 nuclear warheads are smashed down, several major cities in the United States will be gone. Who will do this kind of loss-making business?
Let's talk about Trump again. He is a businessman and everything he does has to be calculated on cost account. War is a business for him. Back then, he sent 8 warships and more than 4000 soldiers near Venezuela. He looked like he wanted to take action. The result was just a so-called "drug-carrying speedboat" and did not dare to actually invade.
Why? Because if you really spend money in a fight, you may not be able to win, which is not in line with his business thinking. He is so cautious about Venezuela, let alone China.
If he really dared to start a war with China, not to say that he could not win militarily, the domestic economy would collapse, the American people would have been tired of war, a bunch of public security and employment problems, if he fell into a major war, his votes would be lost, which is much more than a trade war lost.
There is also an unavoidable rule, the Sino-U.S. economy has long been bound together, like a baby, no one can be separated from anyone, even if the trade war is fought, in 2025 the two countries also signed a trade framework agreement in London, explaining that business has to be done.
American agricultural products and high-tech products want to be sold, and they can't live without our manufacturing products. If there is a real war, the global supply chain will be directly broken, prices will soar, and factories will close down. The American people will be the first to refuse to agree.
What Trump cares about most is economic data. If the war destroys the stock market and employment rate, his political ambitions will be beyond his reach.
To say the least, even if the United States really wants to fight, its allies may not follow suit. Most European countries want to remain neutral, and allies in the Asia-Pacific region are afraid of being dragged into the water. After all, no one wants to offend China, a big market.
And the U.S. own military deployment also has problems, although in the Indo-Pacific military exercises and bases, but those allies are clear in their hearts, and it really happens that the U.S. will not really protect them.
In 2023, an American general said that he would go to war with China in 2025. What happened? It is not because of soft means such as sanctions and blockades that we dare not touch real things at all.
Some people always say that "war is a continuation of politics", but this phrase depends on who to fight with, with the stronger small country of the United States, with China such a nuclear, with a complete industrial system, with a huge market, is not a continuation of politics, is a self-seeking death path.
The mind of the United States is actually very clear now, that is, it wants to rely on military deterrence and technological blockade to contain us and make us make concessions, but they have forgotten that we are no longer the country that others used to control.
Our 055 destroyers have been launched one by one, Dongfeng missiles are becoming more and more advanced, and nuclear counterattack capabilities are becoming more and more reliable. These are either to proactively stir up trouble, or to prevent others from bullying us.
Those experts in the United States said that Trump would consider the option of war. To put it bluntly, he would create anxiety and want to put pressure on us. But Trump knew better than anyone else that there was no winner in a war with China. Not only would he not get any benefits, but he would also have to put his hegemonic position into it. He would never do such a stupid thing.
To sum up, it is one sentence: the US trade war may be lost, it may be a joke and some sanctions, but it is really necessary to destroy China, neither that military power, nor that economic capital, nor does it conform to Trump's calculation.
We don't have to be afraid of those threats, do our own things, have guys in the hand, have money in the pocket, nobody dares to trick us.
The average age of the U.S. Navy’s main force vessels has been more than 30 years, while the other side of China, the destroyer dropped in the past decade almost all the new Type 052D and Type 055.
It is not enough to compare the old and new warships. Modern warfare is about the system, especially the "anchoring needle" of nuclear power. The United States has nuclear warheads, and so does China. Moreover, the current counterattack capabilities are no longer what they used to be. Those underground fortifications in the northwest are longitudinal and horizontal. For thousands of kilometers, it is difficult to distinguish the authenticity of missile silos, and it is impossible for the United States to finish them in one pot.
There are nuclear submarines in the sea, quietly hidden in the depths of the ocean, carrying "big waves" missiles can hit more than 10,000 kilometers, even if the mainland is hit, these submarines can counteract.
Not to mention the Dongfeng-41 missile, whose range covers the mainland of the United States, and the split-guided multiple warheads cannot be stopped at all. American experts themselves have calculated that even if they launch 200 nuclear bombs first, we will have at least 10% of our strength left to fight back. If these 20 nuclear warheads are smashed down, several major cities in the United States will be gone. Who will do this kind of loss-making business?
Let's talk about Trump again. He is a businessman and everything he does has to be calculated on cost account. War is a business for him. Back then, he sent 8 warships and more than 4000 soldiers near Venezuela. He looked like he wanted to take action. The result was just a so-called "drug-carrying speedboat" and did not dare to actually invade.
Why? Because if you really spend money in a fight, you may not be able to win, which is not in line with his business thinking. He is so cautious about Venezuela, let alone China.
If he really dared to start a war with China, not to say that he could not win militarily, the domestic economy would collapse, the American people would have been tired of war, a bunch of public security and employment problems, if he fell into a major war, his votes would be lost, which is much more than a trade war lost.
There is also an unavoidable rule, the Sino-U.S. economy has long been bound together, like a baby, no one can be separated from anyone, even if the trade war is fought, in 2025 the two countries also signed a trade framework agreement in London, explaining that business has to be done.
American agricultural products and high-tech products want to be sold, and they can't live without our manufacturing products. If there is a real war, the global supply chain will be directly broken, prices will soar, and factories will close down. The American people will be the first to refuse to agree.
What Trump cares about most is economic data. If the war destroys the stock market and employment rate, his political ambitions will be beyond his reach.
To say the least, even if the United States really wants to fight, its allies may not follow suit. Most European countries want to remain neutral, and allies in the Asia-Pacific region are afraid of being dragged into the water. After all, no one wants to offend China, a big market.
And the U.S. own military deployment also has problems, although in the Indo-Pacific military exercises and bases, but those allies are clear in their hearts, and it really happens that the U.S. will not really protect them.
In 2023, an American general said that he would go to war with China in 2025. What happened? It is not because of soft means such as sanctions and blockades that we dare not touch real things at all.
Some people always say that "war is a continuation of politics", but this phrase depends on who to fight with, with the stronger small country of the United States, with China such a nuclear, with a complete industrial system, with a huge market, is not a continuation of politics, is a self-seeking death path.
The mind of the United States is actually very clear now, that is, it wants to rely on military deterrence and technological blockade to contain us and make us make concessions, but they have forgotten that we are no longer the country that others used to control.
Our 055 destroyers have been launched one by one, Dongfeng missiles are becoming more and more advanced, and nuclear counterattack capabilities are becoming more and more reliable. These are either to proactively stir up trouble, or to prevent others from bullying us.
Those experts in the United States said that Trump would consider the option of war. To put it bluntly, he would create anxiety and want to put pressure on us. But Trump knew better than anyone else that there was no winner in a war with China. Not only would he not get any benefits, but he would also have to put his hegemonic position into it. He would never do such a stupid thing.
To sum up, it is one sentence: the US trade war may be lost, it may be a joke and some sanctions, but it is really necessary to destroy China, neither that military power, nor that economic capital, nor does it conform to Trump's calculation.
We don't have to be afraid of those threats, do our own things, have guys in the hand, have money in the pocket, nobody dares to trick us.