Both sides would rather be defeated and wounded than willing to give each other a ladder, but things are not so simple, China does not give the United States a ladder not because of the face, but has clearly seen the essence of this game: once concessions, the initiative of future development may be lost.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner and click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you more quality content, thank you for your support!
Many people always think that China-US friction is tariffs, diplomatic quarrels, in fact, it is only the surface. The real quarrel, is the industry dominance dispute. The United States sees very clearly, who has mastered the key technology, who can reap global profits and formulate the rules of the game.
Therefore, there will be various sanctions against Huawei, chip bans, export controls, the purpose is one: not to give China a chance to continue chasing, to re-enlarge the technological gap. is like you and the opponent to run, the other party finds you are chasing, just remove the runway, hide the shoes, so you can not run.
For China, this is non-negotiable. Key technologies cannot give in. If you take a step back, you will fall into the pit and you will not be able to get up for ten years. If you give up the dominance of future industries such as chips, 5G, and artificial intelligence, you will be giving up your future job to others and have to pay a high price to buy other people's technology.
I have to admit that the US sanctions have indeed given us a head start. It turns out that we still have shortcomings in the fields of semiconductors and high-end equipment. I might have thought "Just buy it" before, but now I realize that you can't buy it at the critical moment!
So, China's strategy to shift to science and technology self-reliance is not a slogan, but a deadline.The policy level to increase research investment, the introduction of large funds to support the chip industry, from materials, equipment, EDA software to chip design, packaging manufacturing, the entire industrial chain is accelerating.
For example, Huawei, everyone thought that if it was sanctioned, it would be finished. As a result, it held its breath and produced domestic chips for Mate series mobile phones. Even if the yield was not high at first, it still managed to bite them down. This is a typical "forced innovation".
In short, the United States wants to kill China's high-tech industry, and the result is that China is determined to eat down all the technology.In the short term it hurts a little, but in the long term, technology independence is the real sense of security.
It is not enough to build a closed-door car, China is playing a "double-track strategy". on the one hand, blowing money and policy to engage in independent innovation and break through the technological blockade; on the other hand, engage in the "Belt and Road" and BRICS cooperation, drawing more partners to play together.
If you block me, I will be with more people. through international cooperation to engage in technology exchange, to engage in market interaction, let yourself not solitary warfare. many countries do not want to be forever pinched in the neck by the United States, China's technology and program, just offer an option.
This style of play is a bit like playing chess: while consolidating your foundation, you have to lay out outside, both defending and attacking. As a result, the harsher the U.S. blockade, the more incentive China has to innovate; The more international cooperation, the harder it is for the United States to play unilateral hegemony.
It must be admitted that this road is not easy. We are indeed short of high-end chips, and we still have to catch up with lithography machines. In the short term, domestic substitution will definitely have pain: high cost, low yield, and long research and development cycle. But the problem is, if you compromise because of labor pain, you will be stuck forever.
It's like building muscles in fitness. The more you tear it, the more it hurts, but it won't grow if it doesn't hurt. Now, China has to hold back the pain, insist on investing in research and development, insist on independent innovation, and spend a few years or even more than ten years in exchange for dominance in the next few decades.
Moreover, this is not a mere business issue, but a question of national security and development. Chips, AI, quantum communications, these things determine the rules of the next generation of industrial revolution.
The Chinese-American technology game, in the end, is a long run about the future, who wins, who can decide the global division of labor pattern.The United States thinks of "my family is unique", China thinks of "I want to stand up myself".
In the short term, U.S. sanctions make many Chinese enterprises hungry, but this is also the best alert: no longer fantasy "buy and buy" can solve the problem, no longer rely on others to give core technology.
We ordinary people may not feel how difficult it is to develop high-end chips, but when domestic chips and domestic equipment make breakthroughs one by one, the prices of our mobile phones, cars, and home appliances will be more stable, and our industrial chain will be safer.
Therefore, instead of complaining about US sanctions, it is better to be more patient in supporting domestic innovation. Even if the product is a bit expensive and imperfect at first, give it time to grow. Because this is the key battle of whether we can have the right to speak in the next few decades.
Sino-U.S. relationship trouble collapses: the US side holds the wrong perception of China, leading to the wrong policy towards China
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner and click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you more quality content, thank you for your support!
Many people always think that China-US friction is tariffs, diplomatic quarrels, in fact, it is only the surface. The real quarrel, is the industry dominance dispute. The United States sees very clearly, who has mastered the key technology, who can reap global profits and formulate the rules of the game.
Therefore, there will be various sanctions against Huawei, chip bans, export controls, the purpose is one: not to give China a chance to continue chasing, to re-enlarge the technological gap. is like you and the opponent to run, the other party finds you are chasing, just remove the runway, hide the shoes, so you can not run.
For China, this is non-negotiable. Key technologies cannot give in. If you take a step back, you will fall into the pit and you will not be able to get up for ten years. If you give up the dominance of future industries such as chips, 5G, and artificial intelligence, you will be giving up your future job to others and have to pay a high price to buy other people's technology.
I have to admit that the US sanctions have indeed given us a head start. It turns out that we still have shortcomings in the fields of semiconductors and high-end equipment. I might have thought "Just buy it" before, but now I realize that you can't buy it at the critical moment!
So, China's strategy to shift to science and technology self-reliance is not a slogan, but a deadline.The policy level to increase research investment, the introduction of large funds to support the chip industry, from materials, equipment, EDA software to chip design, packaging manufacturing, the entire industrial chain is accelerating.
For example, Huawei, everyone thought that if it was sanctioned, it would be finished. As a result, it held its breath and produced domestic chips for Mate series mobile phones. Even if the yield was not high at first, it still managed to bite them down. This is a typical "forced innovation".
In short, the United States wants to kill China's high-tech industry, and the result is that China is determined to eat down all the technology.In the short term it hurts a little, but in the long term, technology independence is the real sense of security.
It is not enough to build a closed-door car, China is playing a "double-track strategy". on the one hand, blowing money and policy to engage in independent innovation and break through the technological blockade; on the other hand, engage in the "Belt and Road" and BRICS cooperation, drawing more partners to play together.
If you block me, I will be with more people. through international cooperation to engage in technology exchange, to engage in market interaction, let yourself not solitary warfare. many countries do not want to be forever pinched in the neck by the United States, China's technology and program, just offer an option.
This style of play is a bit like playing chess: while consolidating your foundation, you have to lay out outside, both defending and attacking. As a result, the harsher the U.S. blockade, the more incentive China has to innovate; The more international cooperation, the harder it is for the United States to play unilateral hegemony.
It must be admitted that this road is not easy. We are indeed short of high-end chips, and we still have to catch up with lithography machines. In the short term, domestic substitution will definitely have pain: high cost, low yield, and long research and development cycle. But the problem is, if you compromise because of labor pain, you will be stuck forever.
It's like building muscles in fitness. The more you tear it, the more it hurts, but it won't grow if it doesn't hurt. Now, China has to hold back the pain, insist on investing in research and development, insist on independent innovation, and spend a few years or even more than ten years in exchange for dominance in the next few decades.
Moreover, this is not a mere business issue, but a question of national security and development. Chips, AI, quantum communications, these things determine the rules of the next generation of industrial revolution.
The Chinese-American technology game, in the end, is a long run about the future, who wins, who can decide the global division of labor pattern.The United States thinks of "my family is unique", China thinks of "I want to stand up myself".
In the short term, U.S. sanctions make many Chinese enterprises hungry, but this is also the best alert: no longer fantasy "buy and buy" can solve the problem, no longer rely on others to give core technology.
We ordinary people may not feel how difficult it is to develop high-end chips, but when domestic chips and domestic equipment make breakthroughs one by one, the prices of our mobile phones, cars, and home appliances will be more stable, and our industrial chain will be safer.
Therefore, instead of complaining about US sanctions, it is better to be more patient in supporting domestic innovation. Even if the product is a bit expensive and imperfect at first, give it time to grow. Because this is the key battle of whether we can have the right to speak in the next few decades.
Sino-U.S. relationship trouble collapses: the US side holds the wrong perception of China, leading to the wrong policy towards China