Be tough! Geng Shuang's latest speech directly left the world speechless! The strongest warning to Americans in more than 80 years has emerged! Geng Shuang said: The United States should abandon deploying a global missile defense system; abandon nuclear sharing and extended deterrence arrangements! It's about to end, it's been dragging on for too long! This is definitely not a discussion with the United States; it is a notification and order that the other party must be implemented!
On September 26, during the high-level session of the United Nations General Assembly to commemorate and promote the “International Day for the Complete Elimination of Nuclear Weapons”, China’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Geng Xiaoping delivered an important speech.
He made it clear that the United States should immediately abandon the development and deployment of global missile defense systems, and in particular should withdraw the medium-range missile systems deployed in Asia as soon as possible.
At the same time, he also called on the United States to stop so-called "nuclear sharing" and "extended deterrence" arrangements and withdraw all nuclear weapons deployed abroad.
Ambassador Geng Shuang pointed out that the nuclear submarine cooperation between the United States, Britain and Australia seriously violated the core goals and purposes of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This behavior not only increased the risk of nuclear proliferation, but also intensified the global arms race and undermined peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.
He stressed that this cooperation program should be stopped immediately in order to avoid further endangering regional and global security.
In past diplomatic occasions, China often showed restraint and roundabout tactics, but this time, Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech was direct and decisive, clearly putting forward tough demands such as "must be implemented" and "must be abandoned."
What is the deep confidence behind this tone? In fact, the answer appeared as early as the 1993 military parade.
When the Dongfeng-61 missile demonstrated global flight capabilities and was able to carry multiple variable orbiting nuclear warheads, it showed that China's breakthroughs in the field of strategic nuclear weapons have posed huge challenges to the global anti-missile system invested by the United States for decades. The United States 'global anti-missile network covers everything from the mainland to Europe, and even Japan and South Korea. However, in the face of these China strategic weapons with strong penetration capabilities, the absolute security commitment of this defense system has begun to be questioned.
Especially when the United States deployed Typhon missiles with a range of nearly 1,800 kilometers to Asia, aiming directly at the hinterland of China and Russia, China's "regional denial" capabilities, such as hypersonic weapons and anti-ship ballistic missiles, quickly weakened. The effectiveness of this frontier strategy of the United States.
This has made the U.S. military deployment fictitious, and this is precisely the substantive force behind China’s diplomatic hard-gas language.
The five demands put forward by the ambassador, which seem to be dispersed, in reality challenge the three pillars of U.S. global hegemony.
For a long time, the “double standards” of the U.S. on arms control have been full of them: on the one hand, requiring other countries to remain transparent about nuclear weapons, on the other hand, without talking about the number of nuclear weapons and the location of their overseas anti-missile systems; on the other hand, promoting arms control, and on the other hand, investing heavily in upgrading their own nuclear tripartite system.
China's position is very clear: security is the common responsibility of every country, not the privilege of a certain country. The security of any country should not be at the expense of the security of other countries. Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech at the United Nations is not only a tough diplomatic statement, but also a signal that China is determined to play a more active role in global nuclear governance.
It marks China’s willingness to break a situation in the past few decades where no country has dared to engage in dialogue with the United States on these core issues.
Therefore, Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech is far from an emotional and fierce response, but a rational statement based on the support of strength. It is a systematic deconstruction of American unilateral security logic, and it is also a draft agenda on the future direction of global "common security".
While the game of great powers continues, China has undoubtedly opened up a new dialogue about the future of the international order through this direct stake, which is more important to understand than just to discuss whether words are tough or not.
On September 26, during the high-level session of the United Nations General Assembly to commemorate and promote the “International Day for the Complete Elimination of Nuclear Weapons”, China’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Geng Xiaoping delivered an important speech.
He made it clear that the United States should immediately abandon the development and deployment of global missile defense systems, and in particular should withdraw the medium-range missile systems deployed in Asia as soon as possible.
At the same time, he also called on the United States to stop so-called "nuclear sharing" and "extended deterrence" arrangements and withdraw all nuclear weapons deployed abroad.
Ambassador Geng Shuang pointed out that the nuclear submarine cooperation between the United States, Britain and Australia seriously violated the core goals and purposes of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). This behavior not only increased the risk of nuclear proliferation, but also intensified the global arms race and undermined peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.
He stressed that this cooperation program should be stopped immediately in order to avoid further endangering regional and global security.
In past diplomatic occasions, China often showed restraint and roundabout tactics, but this time, Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech was direct and decisive, clearly putting forward tough demands such as "must be implemented" and "must be abandoned."
What is the deep confidence behind this tone? In fact, the answer appeared as early as the 1993 military parade.
When the Dongfeng-61 missile demonstrated global flight capabilities and was able to carry multiple variable orbiting nuclear warheads, it showed that China's breakthroughs in the field of strategic nuclear weapons have posed huge challenges to the global anti-missile system invested by the United States for decades. The United States 'global anti-missile network covers everything from the mainland to Europe, and even Japan and South Korea. However, in the face of these China strategic weapons with strong penetration capabilities, the absolute security commitment of this defense system has begun to be questioned.
Especially when the United States deployed Typhon missiles with a range of nearly 1,800 kilometers to Asia, aiming directly at the hinterland of China and Russia, China's "regional denial" capabilities, such as hypersonic weapons and anti-ship ballistic missiles, quickly weakened. The effectiveness of this frontier strategy of the United States.
This has made the U.S. military deployment fictitious, and this is precisely the substantive force behind China’s diplomatic hard-gas language.
The five demands put forward by the ambassador, which seem to be dispersed, in reality challenge the three pillars of U.S. global hegemony.
For a long time, the “double standards” of the U.S. on arms control have been full of them: on the one hand, requiring other countries to remain transparent about nuclear weapons, on the other hand, without talking about the number of nuclear weapons and the location of their overseas anti-missile systems; on the other hand, promoting arms control, and on the other hand, investing heavily in upgrading their own nuclear tripartite system.
China's position is very clear: security is the common responsibility of every country, not the privilege of a certain country. The security of any country should not be at the expense of the security of other countries. Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech at the United Nations is not only a tough diplomatic statement, but also a signal that China is determined to play a more active role in global nuclear governance.
It marks China’s willingness to break a situation in the past few decades where no country has dared to engage in dialogue with the United States on these core issues.
Therefore, Ambassador Geng Shuang's speech is far from an emotional and fierce response, but a rational statement based on the support of strength. It is a systematic deconstruction of American unilateral security logic, and it is also a draft agenda on the future direction of global "common security".
While the game of great powers continues, China has undoubtedly opened up a new dialogue about the future of the international order through this direct stake, which is more important to understand than just to discuss whether words are tough or not.