Source: Live broadcast
Live broadcast, October 01. In the new edition of the Premier League referee penalty analysis program, Premier League referee CEO Weber said that in the last round of the Premier League match between Newcastle and Arsenal, Jocres was put down. The penalty penalty was cancelled after the penalty kick was cancelled. The on-field penalty penalty was the correct penalty.
Weber argued that when chief referee Gillette failed to first discover the fact that Newcomen had touched the ball, VAR-England intervened correctly and cancelled the ball sentence correctly.
Weber's penalty is analyzed as follows:
“In a full-speed run, it looks like a ball, isn’t it? We can fully understand the judge’s judgment based on the scene’s view. At that time he thought Popper had done a stumbling move. VAR then checked the ball’s judgment. This apparently falls within the reviewable scope, including the ball, the goal, and so on.
“VAR needs to confirm that there is no apparent misjudgment during the verification process. Through slow lens playback, you can clearly see Yokes touching the football first and slightly kicking it forward, but the key is: Popp touched the ball equally apparently when his right foot came out and changed the running trajectory of the ball.
"The referee failed to notice this on the court. Then Pope landed his foot on the ground and did not continue to kick forward at Yorkres.
“After Popp touched the ball, there was a clear gap between the two players, and the subsequent contact was a normal physical collision. Popp’s actions were in accordance with the rules of the sport and were not dangerous, only the normal kicking movement caused the change in the path of the ball.
"Only after Pope finished touching the ball did the players from both sides have normal physical contact. Therefore, this does not constitute a foul. VAR's intervention this time is very necessary. It restored the truth of the incident to the referee. The change in the ball path is very obvious. You can see that Yorkres touched the ball first, and then Pope stepped in with his right leg to touch the ball, causing the football to deviate from its original trajectory.
“When Poppe touched the ground behind the ball, there was a noticeable gap between him and Jokes, and there was no contact at this time.
"To sum up, Pope's defensive action this time was clean and neat and did not constitute a foul. The key point in this case is that the referee failed to identify Popper's touch with the ball immediately.
“That’s why when VAR discovered Pop’s touch of the ball, it was judged to be a clearly obvious misjudgment. The main referee was able to review this critical detail through a playback screen and decide on his own. His final judgment was:Confirming the fact that Pop has touched the ball, therefore, does not constitute a breach of the rule, the game is resumed by the ball.
"The referee's initial failure to recognize this touch was crucial, and VAR accurately captured this clear misjudgment.I support VAR's intervention, which allowed the main referee to see the whole process through the play sequence, confirming that Pop was just a normal kicking movement, and the penalty was therefore correctly revoked.”