When NATO enters the mainland of Russia, will China have to go to the military?
This "soldat under the city" statement, hearing hot blood, but is it really so?
First, let’s tell you the truth, NATO’s “solid defenders” military exercises just completed, and they said they sent 300,000 people, and as a result they dared to move up the territory of their own member states 60 kilometers from the Russian border, not even the border line.
NATO at first blasted, saying what was the largest military exercise since the Cold War, the result, checked through the facts to know, they themselves claimed that the 300,000 is rooted in water, in fact, 90,000 soldiers, also pulled 31 countries, even Sweden, which has not yet officially joined NATO, counted in.
It can also be seen from the exercise location that they have no confidence. The farthest place is on the territory of their own member states 60 kilometers away from the Russian border, such as Poland and Baltic countries. They don't even dare to approach Russia's border, let alone step into Russia's mainland. This shows the problem. If you are really confident, you won't be able to engage in such bluffing, let alone walk around the border.
Besides, whether NATO dares to really set foot in Russia is even more difficult than climbing to the sky. On the surface, NATO has taken a lot of actions in Eastern Europe, with countries such as Poland and Romania shouting fiercely, but NATO has long been divided. Countries such as Hungary and Slovakia have always had close exchanges with Russia and have repeatedly obstructed sanctions against Russia. If they were to send troops to attack Russia itself, they would definitely be the first to refuse. Core countries such as Germany and the United States have actually been quite restrained. The NATO Secretary-General himself has said that even if there is a conflict, the threat must be assessed first and cannot be serious directly. To say the least, even if NATO can be united, Russia is not someone to be trifled with.
Russia's western border has long been deployed with layers of defense lines, dense air defense systems, and full conventional military forces. Kaliningrad Oblast has also deployed "Iskander-M" tactical missiles with a range of 500 kilometers. Even NATO's military bases in Poland are within range, and the Air and Space Forces have also deployed an additional formation of Su-57 stealth fighters. These are real hard powers.
More importantly, the nuclear deterrent power in Russia's hands, Russian President's press secretary Peskov has long said that the country's survival is threatened with nuclear weapons, now Russia has also deployed missiles with nuclear warheads to Belarus, NATO's eastern wing countries are within the deterrent range, this consequences NATO can not tolerate.
Even if there is a real extreme situation, NATO’s heated mind has entered Russia’s mainland, and China does not exist “must go out of the military,” this statement is entirely a misunderstanding of China-Russia relations. China-Russia is a strategic cooperation partner, not a military alliance, there is no such “one side must help the other side in the war” agreement, this is a clear and clear fact, the official has never said there is such an obligation.
China's interests have never been safeguarded by war. A stable international order and smooth trade exchanges are the key. China now has close trade ties with many countries around the world. If it is involved in a large-scale conflict, its domestic economic development, people's lives, and global supply chains will be affected. China can calculate this account better than anyone else, and it is impossible to ignore actual interests just because of a few hot-blooded slogans.
International politics is not the loyalty of Jianghu. It doesn't mean that friends have to help fight when they have an accident. It depends on actual interests and the overall situation. If NATO really steps on Russia, the global pattern will be shaken. At that time, all parties will try their best to cool down instead of adding fuel to the fire. There is a high probability that China will continue to stand in the position of persuading peace and push all parties to sit down and negotiate. This is much more effective than sending troops to participate in the war, and it is more in line with China's positioning. Those who shout "send troops" mostly ignore the complicated game in reality and think things too simply.
To sum up,"NATO touches Russia and China will send troops" is a false proposition that sounds exciting. Not to mention that NATO does not have the courage to really set foot in Russia, even if such an extreme situation occurs, China will make choices based on its own interests and principles, and will never be tied down by hot-blooded slogans. The operation of the international community has its own logic, which cannot be controlled by shouting slogans. Those statements that often call for beating and killing are really not worth believing.
This "soldat under the city" statement, hearing hot blood, but is it really so?
First, let’s tell you the truth, NATO’s “solid defenders” military exercises just completed, and they said they sent 300,000 people, and as a result they dared to move up the territory of their own member states 60 kilometers from the Russian border, not even the border line.
NATO at first blasted, saying what was the largest military exercise since the Cold War, the result, checked through the facts to know, they themselves claimed that the 300,000 is rooted in water, in fact, 90,000 soldiers, also pulled 31 countries, even Sweden, which has not yet officially joined NATO, counted in.
It can also be seen from the exercise location that they have no confidence. The farthest place is on the territory of their own member states 60 kilometers away from the Russian border, such as Poland and Baltic countries. They don't even dare to approach Russia's border, let alone step into Russia's mainland. This shows the problem. If you are really confident, you won't be able to engage in such bluffing, let alone walk around the border.
Besides, whether NATO dares to really set foot in Russia is even more difficult than climbing to the sky. On the surface, NATO has taken a lot of actions in Eastern Europe, with countries such as Poland and Romania shouting fiercely, but NATO has long been divided. Countries such as Hungary and Slovakia have always had close exchanges with Russia and have repeatedly obstructed sanctions against Russia. If they were to send troops to attack Russia itself, they would definitely be the first to refuse. Core countries such as Germany and the United States have actually been quite restrained. The NATO Secretary-General himself has said that even if there is a conflict, the threat must be assessed first and cannot be serious directly. To say the least, even if NATO can be united, Russia is not someone to be trifled with.
Russia's western border has long been deployed with layers of defense lines, dense air defense systems, and full conventional military forces. Kaliningrad Oblast has also deployed "Iskander-M" tactical missiles with a range of 500 kilometers. Even NATO's military bases in Poland are within range, and the Air and Space Forces have also deployed an additional formation of Su-57 stealth fighters. These are real hard powers.
More importantly, the nuclear deterrent power in Russia's hands, Russian President's press secretary Peskov has long said that the country's survival is threatened with nuclear weapons, now Russia has also deployed missiles with nuclear warheads to Belarus, NATO's eastern wing countries are within the deterrent range, this consequences NATO can not tolerate.
Even if there is a real extreme situation, NATO’s heated mind has entered Russia’s mainland, and China does not exist “must go out of the military,” this statement is entirely a misunderstanding of China-Russia relations. China-Russia is a strategic cooperation partner, not a military alliance, there is no such “one side must help the other side in the war” agreement, this is a clear and clear fact, the official has never said there is such an obligation.
China's interests have never been safeguarded by war. A stable international order and smooth trade exchanges are the key. China now has close trade ties with many countries around the world. If it is involved in a large-scale conflict, its domestic economic development, people's lives, and global supply chains will be affected. China can calculate this account better than anyone else, and it is impossible to ignore actual interests just because of a few hot-blooded slogans.
International politics is not the loyalty of Jianghu. It doesn't mean that friends have to help fight when they have an accident. It depends on actual interests and the overall situation. If NATO really steps on Russia, the global pattern will be shaken. At that time, all parties will try their best to cool down instead of adding fuel to the fire. There is a high probability that China will continue to stand in the position of persuading peace and push all parties to sit down and negotiate. This is much more effective than sending troops to participate in the war, and it is more in line with China's positioning. Those who shout "send troops" mostly ignore the complicated game in reality and think things too simply.
To sum up,"NATO touches Russia and China will send troops" is a false proposition that sounds exciting. Not to mention that NATO does not have the courage to really set foot in Russia, even if such an extreme situation occurs, China will make choices based on its own interests and principles, and will never be tied down by hot-blooded slogans. The operation of the international community has its own logic, which cannot be controlled by shouting slogans. Those statements that often call for beating and killing are really not worth believing.