Many people still think that after three years of battle, the Russian army has been "pulled out". wrong! the truth is, it is used in Ukraine, mostly, is "second-class" equipment; and it is actually used, against NATO's "chart", now, just, pull out!
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
In the early days of the war, most of the weapons and equipment Russia put into Ukraine were second-rate or slow-to-update equipment.
For example, T-72 tanks, Su-25 fighter jets and some old air defense systems, although they still have certain combat effectiveness, are obviously far inferior to modern Western weapon systems.
The use of “second-class” equipment has not caused the Western world to be overly alert, but has also gained more tactical flexibility for Russia.
The Russian military has chosen to show “second-class” equipment at this critical moment, in fact, to maintain its strategic initiative. Russia is aware that Ukraine is not the only battlefield, and NATO’s continued expansion has become their most important threat.
Under this circumstance, Russia decided to “hide” more sharp forces in order to quickly deploy state-of-the-art weapons at the right time in response to NATO threats.
As the war continued, NATO’s support for Ukraine grew steadily.From providing advanced weapons to training the Ukrainian army, NATO’s assistance has gradually shifted from early defensive equipment to more advanced offensive weapons.
In particular, Western countries' assistance to Ukraine's high-precision rocket systems and modern fighter jets has given Ukraine stronger combat capabilities in the air and ground battlefields.
Russia’s “second-class equipment” is clearly unable to cope with NATO pressure for a long time.
Russia had to make a strategic adjustment and began to increase its efforts to deploy more of its high-end weapons. In this case, Russia gradually puts its most strategic weapons, such as the latest T-90M tanks, Su-57 invisible fighters and new missile defense systems, into the battlefield.
These equipment can not only effectively enhance the combat effectiveness of the Russian military, but also curb NATO's continued expansion to a certain extent.
As NATO's military support for Ukraine grows, Russia begins to realize that simply using "second-rate equipment" cannot fully cope with the pressure of war.
At this time, Russia finally decided to show its "trump card" on the battlefield, such as the T-14 "Armata" main battle tank that has been put into use.
This new tank surpasses Western main battle tanks in terms of protective capabilities, firepower and mobility, and can be called Russia's "ace" equipment.
Russia has also increased its use of long-range combat weapons, such as the “Gorky” series of high-precision missiles.
The range, accuracy and power of these missiles far outweigh conventional weapons systems, posing a major threat to NATO’s logistics supply lines and command centers.
At the same time, Russia has significantly increased its deployment of nuclear weapons and issued a strong strategic warning to NATO.
Although Russia has not made nuclear weapons its main tactical choice in the past few years, as the situation continues to escalate, Russia is ready to use this "ultimate weapon" at an appropriate time to express its tough stance to Western countries.
From a strategic deployment point of view, Russia’s core goal is not to completely defeat the enemy in Ukraine, but to defend its core interests and force NATO to compromise its strategic needs through limited use of high-end weapons.
Russia's low-key attack is actually fortifying the further expansion of NATO.
By hiding the most sharp forces, Russia is able to give NATO enormous strategic pressure by striking the enemy when necessary.
This strategic defensive approach also allows Russia to respond to the battle in Ukraine in the short term, while retaining its true strategic strength and waiting for a more suitable opportunity to launch a counterattack.
The current situation suggests that Russia’s strategic depth is far above the expectations of the general public. Although Russia has shown some low-tone in the last three years of war, its strategic plot is far-reaching.
Russia has maintained its strategic mobility by constantly concealing its core strength.
As NATO’s support increases, Russia will inevitably counter-attack at the right time and unleash its “trunks” forces, forcing its opponents to rethink their strategic choices.
This is not only Russia's self-defense, but also a strategic warning to NATO and its allies. Russia's "hidden" war will test the judgment and response ability of western countries in the global strategic layout.
Trouble see the official gentlemen in the upper right corner click on "attention", which is both convenient for you to discuss and share, but can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
In the early days of the war, most of the weapons and equipment Russia put into Ukraine were second-rate or slow-to-update equipment.
For example, T-72 tanks, Su-25 fighter jets and some old air defense systems, although they still have certain combat effectiveness, are obviously far inferior to modern Western weapon systems.
The use of “second-class” equipment has not caused the Western world to be overly alert, but has also gained more tactical flexibility for Russia.
The Russian military has chosen to show “second-class” equipment at this critical moment, in fact, to maintain its strategic initiative. Russia is aware that Ukraine is not the only battlefield, and NATO’s continued expansion has become their most important threat.
Under this circumstance, Russia decided to “hide” more sharp forces in order to quickly deploy state-of-the-art weapons at the right time in response to NATO threats.
As the war continued, NATO’s support for Ukraine grew steadily.From providing advanced weapons to training the Ukrainian army, NATO’s assistance has gradually shifted from early defensive equipment to more advanced offensive weapons.
In particular, Western countries' assistance to Ukraine's high-precision rocket systems and modern fighter jets has given Ukraine stronger combat capabilities in the air and ground battlefields.
Russia’s “second-class equipment” is clearly unable to cope with NATO pressure for a long time.
Russia had to make a strategic adjustment and began to increase its efforts to deploy more of its high-end weapons. In this case, Russia gradually puts its most strategic weapons, such as the latest T-90M tanks, Su-57 invisible fighters and new missile defense systems, into the battlefield.
These equipment can not only effectively enhance the combat effectiveness of the Russian military, but also curb NATO's continued expansion to a certain extent.
As NATO's military support for Ukraine grows, Russia begins to realize that simply using "second-rate equipment" cannot fully cope with the pressure of war.
At this time, Russia finally decided to show its "trump card" on the battlefield, such as the T-14 "Armata" main battle tank that has been put into use.
This new tank surpasses Western main battle tanks in terms of protective capabilities, firepower and mobility, and can be called Russia's "ace" equipment.
Russia has also increased its use of long-range combat weapons, such as the “Gorky” series of high-precision missiles.
The range, accuracy and power of these missiles far outweigh conventional weapons systems, posing a major threat to NATO’s logistics supply lines and command centers.
At the same time, Russia has significantly increased its deployment of nuclear weapons and issued a strong strategic warning to NATO.
Although Russia has not made nuclear weapons its main tactical choice in the past few years, as the situation continues to escalate, Russia is ready to use this "ultimate weapon" at an appropriate time to express its tough stance to Western countries.
From a strategic deployment point of view, Russia’s core goal is not to completely defeat the enemy in Ukraine, but to defend its core interests and force NATO to compromise its strategic needs through limited use of high-end weapons.
Russia's low-key attack is actually fortifying the further expansion of NATO.
By hiding the most sharp forces, Russia is able to give NATO enormous strategic pressure by striking the enemy when necessary.
This strategic defensive approach also allows Russia to respond to the battle in Ukraine in the short term, while retaining its true strategic strength and waiting for a more suitable opportunity to launch a counterattack.
The current situation suggests that Russia’s strategic depth is far above the expectations of the general public. Although Russia has shown some low-tone in the last three years of war, its strategic plot is far-reaching.
Russia has maintained its strategic mobility by constantly concealing its core strength.
As NATO’s support increases, Russia will inevitably counter-attack at the right time and unleash its “trunks” forces, forcing its opponents to rethink their strategic choices.
This is not only Russia's self-defense, but also a strategic warning to NATO and its allies. Russia's "hidden" war will test the judgment and response ability of western countries in the global strategic layout.