Medvedev: Once the war is defeated, attack four countries with nuclear bombs, bring the world to the end, use strategic nuclear weapons to strike against Ukraine, Germany, Britain and the United States, thereby triggering global devastation.
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
Medvedev’s words, it can be said, show the character of the Russians who prefer not to break down, and because now several European countries openly support Russia, and are also ready to send troops against Russia.
If Europe and the United States directly help Ukraine, Russia's situation can be said to be precarious. Just the proxy war between Europe and the United States is now unbearable for Russia. If Europe and the United States end up, Russia will definitely lose.
The current vice-chairman of the Russian Security Council said this, which is not only a threat to Europe and America, but also a high-intensity psychological war.
Why did he name these four countries? In fact, the logic behind this is very clear. Needless to say, Ukraine is the direct opponent of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
The United States is the backbone of the entire Western aid system. Not only does it have the largest military aid funds, it also provides Ukraine with satellite intelligence, weapons and equipment, and strategic guidance.
Since the beginning of the war, Britain has been playing the "accelerating vanguard", from tanks, missiles to intelligence support, everything has not fallen.Germany has been low-level for decades after the war, but this time has changed the norm, not only sending money to equipment, but also driving the rest of the EU countries together.
These four countries are either directly involved in the conflict or providing decisive support in the rear, naming them is to maximize the pressure.
In fact, the situation Russia is currently facing is extremely difficult. On the conventional battlefield, as assistance from NATO countries continues to escalate, Ukraine's defense lines have not been easily defeated, but have become increasingly "modern."
A new batch of equipment, drones, and long-range missiles are continuously sent to the front line, putting great pressure on the Russian army. Instead of giving in, the western countries kept exaggerating the "Putin threat theory", which made the whole of Europe tense.
High officials in Britain and Germany even publicly talked about “preparing for the outbreak of a war with Russia,” such a war atmosphere, let alone Russia, the ordinary people listened to with horror.
In this context, Medvedev’s nuclear threat was by no means accidental. he understood that conventional weapons had been difficult to reverse the situation, and only removing nuclear weapons from the “ultimate bottom” could have a deterrent effect on the psychological level.
In fact, Russia knows very well that once nuclear weapons are really used anywhere, the consequence will be global destruction. Not to mention Western countries, even Russia itself will face complete retaliation.
Medvedev himself said that “no one wants a nuclear war” and that these statements are more “crying” than real operational plans. after all, as long as the nuclear warhead is still in the well, it is deterrence; really to light up, no one can escape.
Why does Russia want to amplify the "nuclear threat" at this time? In fact, this is directly related to the current battlefield situation and international environment. As NATO continues to increase its strength, Russia's conventional forces are gradually being consumed.
Even if the proportion of modern weapons increases, the pressure on the Russian military will only increase in the face of NATO's annual military spending of trillions of dollars. At this time, nuclear deterrence has become Russia's last resort to maintain strategic balance and force the West to "step on the brakes". Shouting it out is to make its opponents think twice.
In fact, this psychological war is not without effect. last year, the Russian public opinion several times blasted "non-nuclear destruction of Kiev", the Western military aid once swung, and some long-range missile deliveries markedly slowed.
Western countries are not a piece of iron, the people of Germany, France, Italy and other countries were already anxious about the war investment, Medvedev's words, just exacerbated their concerns.
Medvedev's "nuclear end" speech is more of a limit of pressure on Russia in strategic difficulties. He allows the opponent not to be dumb, but also to the domestic people to air, steadfast. This "distract security" approach has been tried repeatedly in history, but really to take it as an action plan, I am afraid that nobody has the courage.
What do you think?
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
Medvedev’s words, it can be said, show the character of the Russians who prefer not to break down, and because now several European countries openly support Russia, and are also ready to send troops against Russia.
If Europe and the United States directly help Ukraine, Russia's situation can be said to be precarious. Just the proxy war between Europe and the United States is now unbearable for Russia. If Europe and the United States end up, Russia will definitely lose.
The current vice-chairman of the Russian Security Council said this, which is not only a threat to Europe and America, but also a high-intensity psychological war.
Why did he name these four countries? In fact, the logic behind this is very clear. Needless to say, Ukraine is the direct opponent of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
The United States is the backbone of the entire Western aid system. Not only does it have the largest military aid funds, it also provides Ukraine with satellite intelligence, weapons and equipment, and strategic guidance.
Since the beginning of the war, Britain has been playing the "accelerating vanguard", from tanks, missiles to intelligence support, everything has not fallen.Germany has been low-level for decades after the war, but this time has changed the norm, not only sending money to equipment, but also driving the rest of the EU countries together.
These four countries are either directly involved in the conflict or providing decisive support in the rear, naming them is to maximize the pressure.
In fact, the situation Russia is currently facing is extremely difficult. On the conventional battlefield, as assistance from NATO countries continues to escalate, Ukraine's defense lines have not been easily defeated, but have become increasingly "modern."
A new batch of equipment, drones, and long-range missiles are continuously sent to the front line, putting great pressure on the Russian army. Instead of giving in, the western countries kept exaggerating the "Putin threat theory", which made the whole of Europe tense.
High officials in Britain and Germany even publicly talked about “preparing for the outbreak of a war with Russia,” such a war atmosphere, let alone Russia, the ordinary people listened to with horror.
In this context, Medvedev’s nuclear threat was by no means accidental. he understood that conventional weapons had been difficult to reverse the situation, and only removing nuclear weapons from the “ultimate bottom” could have a deterrent effect on the psychological level.
In fact, Russia knows very well that once nuclear weapons are really used anywhere, the consequence will be global destruction. Not to mention Western countries, even Russia itself will face complete retaliation.
Medvedev himself said that “no one wants a nuclear war” and that these statements are more “crying” than real operational plans. after all, as long as the nuclear warhead is still in the well, it is deterrence; really to light up, no one can escape.
Why does Russia want to amplify the "nuclear threat" at this time? In fact, this is directly related to the current battlefield situation and international environment. As NATO continues to increase its strength, Russia's conventional forces are gradually being consumed.
Even if the proportion of modern weapons increases, the pressure on the Russian military will only increase in the face of NATO's annual military spending of trillions of dollars. At this time, nuclear deterrence has become Russia's last resort to maintain strategic balance and force the West to "step on the brakes". Shouting it out is to make its opponents think twice.
In fact, this psychological war is not without effect. last year, the Russian public opinion several times blasted "non-nuclear destruction of Kiev", the Western military aid once swung, and some long-range missile deliveries markedly slowed.
Western countries are not a piece of iron, the people of Germany, France, Italy and other countries were already anxious about the war investment, Medvedev's words, just exacerbated their concerns.
Medvedev's "nuclear end" speech is more of a limit of pressure on Russia in strategic difficulties. He allows the opponent not to be dumb, but also to the domestic people to air, steadfast. This "distract security" approach has been tried repeatedly in history, but really to take it as an action plan, I am afraid that nobody has the courage.
What do you think?