On September 22, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, rushing to the Jewish New Year's Eyes, delivered a loud phrase, saying that Israel's New Year's goals, Not only to completely kill Hamas, but also to prepare to attack Iran¡£

Then the stone shocked.

You have to know that the war in Gaza has been burning for more than a year, and there is still no sign of stopping. Hundreds of thousands of people there are displaced, and the humanitarian crisis makes headlines every day. But what about Israel? He didn't even think of stopping, but instead turned his gun around and aimed at the next "big BOSS"-Iran.

There is something evil about this thing. Netanyahu's abacus is actually crackling. In his view, Hamas has been maimed, cannot cause big waves militarily, and has been labeled as a "terrorist organization" in public opinion. The international community shouted loudly for a ceasefire, but with the United States under the protection of the Security Council's repeated "one-vote veto", these voices basically fell deaf to Israel. Since you can do whatever you want in Gaza, it is simply "better to use the remaining courage to chase the poor bandits" and point the finger at Iran.

On the strategic map of Israel, Iran is the brain behind the scenes.¡£ They believe that whether it is Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon, or the armed forces in Syria, Iran is behind them for blood transfusion and support. As long as the "axis" of Iran is still there, the threats around Israel will never be eradicated.

But is this really as simple as he thinks?

To beat Iran is not to beat Hamas, it is not a quantitative opponent at all. Iran is a great country with more than 80 million people and more than 160 million square kilometers of land, and its military power is one-two in the Middle East.

So there are a few cases that Israel can¡¯t go.

The first is the U.S. attitude. The United States scolds Iran every day, and the big stick of sanctions keeps waving, but have you seen it go down? Very rarely. Because Americans also know in their hearts that the risk and cost of attacking Iran are too great. Once the war starts, U.S. military bases in the Middle East and oil channels in the Persian Gulf may become targets of Iranian missiles. So, Israel wants to fight Iran, You have to get the US war certificate first.But now the United States, with a bunch of domestic economic trouble, is really willing to hit such a large horse beetle for Israel?

The second hurdle is the reaction of the entire Arab world. The Middle East is now different from before. Saudi Arabia and Iran, after the history and dissolution, the Arab nations are accelerating the armor. Especially since Israel continued to bomb Gaza, and even after the air strikes on Qatar, the anger of the entire Arab world has been ignited. Egypt even rarely referred to Israel as "enemy", and also proposed the idea of a "Arab version of NATO". In this context, if Israel dared to move Iran, it was no different than throwing bombs into the cannon. It is likely to detonate the sixth Middle East warSaudi Arabia has made it clear that if Israel dares to annex Palestinian land, the relationship we are talking about will be normalized.

The third hurdle comes from Israel. Netanyahu now speaks hard, his domestic pressure is not small at all. The long-lasting war has left the Israeli economy unbearable, and the anti-war sentiment of the people is also accumulating.

At the time of Netanyahu¡¯s defeat against Iran, another war without smoke, Israel has already lost.

What is a diplomatic war?

Similarly, before the 22nd of September, a message came to the face of Israel: The world has recognized the State of Palestine by 157 countries. You read that right, 157. The United Nations has only 193 Member States in total, which is more than three quarters.

The most disturbing thing about Israel is that many familiar faces appear in this ¡°wave of recognition.¡± France, Belgium, Canada, Australia, and even iron buddy Britain. These Western nations, which in the past were relatively ¡°neutral¡± and even pro-Israel on the Palestinian issue, have all stood on the Palestinian side.

This is no longer a simple diplomatic isolation, it is simply a Diplomatic "avalanche"Over the past few decades, Israel has been able to assert that Palestine is not a state.But now, most of the world is telling you with practical action: We acknowledge.It¡¯s like you¡¯ve always said that neighbors don¡¯t exist, and as a result, the owners of the entire district come out to prove that neighbors are not only there, but that we all acknowledge his ownership.

In the face of this situation, what is Israel¡¯s reaction? not reflection, not compromise, but a more insane scream.

Netanyahu directly ¡°declared war¡± on these 157 countries, saying: Wait, I¡¯ll go to Trump and talk about it.He also reiterated that the establishment of a Palestinian state will not be allowed, and that the construction of Jewish settlements in the West Bank will be accelerated.

The extreme-right ministers under him were more fueled by the fire: Treasury Minister Smotrich called for the ¡°complete annexation of the West Bank,¡± while National Security Minister Ben-Gewil proposed ¡°the dissolution of the Palestinian National Authority.¡±The logic of the gang was simple and rough: the more you recognize Palestine, the more we must demonstrate by action that the establishment of a Palestinian state is an illusion.

This is almost suicidal hardness. They thought they could shut the mouths of the world with their fists, but the result would only push themselves into a more dangerous abyss.The European Union, Britain, Saudi Arabia, the UAE... Almost all regional powers are warning Israel not to go to extremes.

In the midst of chaos and roar, China¡¯s position is clear and firm.

In the face of all this, our Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson's statement, It can be said to be crushed.¡£ The Chinese side emphasized several core points:

The first, Gaza belongs to Palestine and is an integral part of the Palestinian territory. This defines the legal nature of Gaza, not a land without a master, much less a bribes that Israel can dispose of at will.

Secondly, We must immediately cease fire and stop the war to alleviate the humanitarian crisis. This is the most urgent task at the moment, human life is closed and cannot be delayed.

Thirdly, We insist on ¡°Bahrain governance¡± and reject any actions that undermine the ¡°two-country program¡±. The future governance of Gaza must be decided by the Palestinian people themselves, and no program imposed by external forces will result.

The fourth, Violence can¡¯t replace security, and violence can¡¯t bring peace. This is the deepest summary of history.Israel thinks that absolute security can rely on military superiority, but decades of conflict prove that the seeds of hatred only produce more hatred.

The United States is still unconditionally biased, and China's position is clearly more in line with the mainstream wishes of the international community, but also more able to win the trust and support of the majority of Arab countries and developing countries.

Talking about this, the whole situation is very clear.

Israel, now, is like a red-eyed gambler.In military terms, it can still temporarily dominate, but it faces a rapidly changing and increasingly unfavourable international environment.

It wants to beat Iran, but it needs to look at the face of the United States, to worry about the rebound of the entire Arab world. It wants to completely eradicate the possibility of the establishment of a Palestinian state, but finds that more than 157 countries around the world have stood on its opposite side. He swung his fist, but found himself being strained by an invisible diplomatic network.

Netanyahu perhaps thinks that if he is tough enough, he can scare everyone off. But history has proved countless times that if a country chooses to be an enemy of the whole world, it will only isolate itself and exhaust itself in the end.

At this crucial historical moment, the voices of China and the vast majority of countries in the world have actually come together in one sentence: A ceasefire, peace talks, the right to a Palestinian state and a just future for this land.

This is not only sympathy for the weak, but also an adherence to international law and human conscience. Because everyone understands the simplest truth: turning the Palestinians' right to statehood from a bargaining chip that has been repeatedly traded into an unshakable reality is the only way to prevent the recurrence of the Gaza tragedy.