[Breeze] Bannon: Arrest Huang Renxun immediately! The fuse of the incident was an interview with Huang Renxun some time ago.
It is a straightforward phrase in an interview with Yuan Yingluo, CEO of Yingluo, recently.When reporters threw the sensitive question of "how to look at the Hawks", Yuan Yingluo did not hesitate, and directly pointed out the harm: "The label "to the Hawks" is basically a disgrace.
These people are always shouting “patriotism,” instead obstructing the rise of the American Dream.”This word is like a blade, precisely striking the pain of certain forces in American politics.
As a leader in the global field of artificial intelligence chips, he knows that the life line of the technology industry lies in the freedom of global collaboration and innovation.
In his view, putting normal business and technological exchanges on a "hostile" or "non-patriot" hat is a short-sighted and dangerous thought.
He stressed that Nvidia’s success is rooted in the open international markets, including the huge demand and talent contribution from China.Those who flag the “national security” banner, but substantially hinder the fair competition of U.S. companies and restrict the flow of talent, ultimately hurt the U.S. own innovation vitality and global leadership.
His point of view represents a substantial part of the Silicon Valley elite’s deep concern about the current political trend – when politics prevails above the laws of the market, the foundations of the American Dream are being shaken.
Bannon's fierce reaction demonstrated exactly the killing power of Yuan Yuan's remarks.The extreme conservative representative who served as Trump's chief strategic adviser, known for inciting populist and tough positions against China, immediately described Yuan's remarks as "treason."
He accused Huang Zemin of "betraying American interests", of being a "Chinese agent", and even of using extreme words such as "arresting."Bannon's logical chain is simple: criticizing "the Hawks" is opposing the United States, standing on the side of China. This non-black and white binary oppositional thinking is the typical expression of "stopping the American Dream" criticized by Huang Zemin.
Bannon's rant is not so much directed at Jensen Huang personally as a full-scale declaration of war on anyone trying to challenge his "hawkish" narrative. Behind this is the irreconcilable and fierce collision between extreme nationalism and global business logic.
The wave quickly triggered a chain reaction between Washington and Silicon Valley.Some hard-fought Republican lawmakers in Congress quickly joined Bannon, demanding a "national security review" of Yuan Yong and NVIDIA to investigate whether its cooperation with Chinese enterprises is "compliant".At a time, discussions about NVIDIA's business and technology export compliance in China were heated.
However, American business and technology circles generally expressed their support for Huang Renxun. Many tech giant executives said privately that Huang Renxun said what they didn't dare to say publicly.
Industry associations have also warned that excessively politicized censorship and "witch hunting" will seriously damage the global competitiveness of the U.S. technology industry and force companies to transfer R&D and production overseas.
This crack clearly shows the profound differences in the American society on how to deal with the rise of China – whether to build a wall, a comprehensive confrontation, or to maintain contact, competition and co-operation?
Huang Renxun's "shame theory" and Bannon's "arrest warrant" are like two mirrors, reflecting the great tension of the United States in dealing with its relations with China. On the one hand, there are pragmatic and future-oriented business leaders who are well aware of the deep binding of the global industrial chain and understand the high cost of "decoupling and breaking chains"; On the other side are political traders who are in command of ideology and incite opposition. They try to gather domestic support by creating external enemies.
When commercial rationality is coerced by political fanaticism, and when "patriotism" becomes a weapon to suppress dissidents, the innovative spirit and open society that the United States is proud of are facing unprecedented tests. This fierce confrontation around Huang Renxun is far from over.
It’s not only about the fate of an entrepreneur, it’s also about what path the United States will take in the future. Do you think that American society can find a rational balance between safeguarding national interests and embracing global cooperation?
It is a straightforward phrase in an interview with Yuan Yingluo, CEO of Yingluo, recently.When reporters threw the sensitive question of "how to look at the Hawks", Yuan Yingluo did not hesitate, and directly pointed out the harm: "The label "to the Hawks" is basically a disgrace.
These people are always shouting “patriotism,” instead obstructing the rise of the American Dream.”This word is like a blade, precisely striking the pain of certain forces in American politics.
As a leader in the global field of artificial intelligence chips, he knows that the life line of the technology industry lies in the freedom of global collaboration and innovation.
In his view, putting normal business and technological exchanges on a "hostile" or "non-patriot" hat is a short-sighted and dangerous thought.
He stressed that Nvidia’s success is rooted in the open international markets, including the huge demand and talent contribution from China.Those who flag the “national security” banner, but substantially hinder the fair competition of U.S. companies and restrict the flow of talent, ultimately hurt the U.S. own innovation vitality and global leadership.
His point of view represents a substantial part of the Silicon Valley elite’s deep concern about the current political trend – when politics prevails above the laws of the market, the foundations of the American Dream are being shaken.
Bannon's fierce reaction demonstrated exactly the killing power of Yuan Yuan's remarks.The extreme conservative representative who served as Trump's chief strategic adviser, known for inciting populist and tough positions against China, immediately described Yuan's remarks as "treason."
He accused Huang Zemin of "betraying American interests", of being a "Chinese agent", and even of using extreme words such as "arresting."Bannon's logical chain is simple: criticizing "the Hawks" is opposing the United States, standing on the side of China. This non-black and white binary oppositional thinking is the typical expression of "stopping the American Dream" criticized by Huang Zemin.
Bannon's rant is not so much directed at Jensen Huang personally as a full-scale declaration of war on anyone trying to challenge his "hawkish" narrative. Behind this is the irreconcilable and fierce collision between extreme nationalism and global business logic.
The wave quickly triggered a chain reaction between Washington and Silicon Valley.Some hard-fought Republican lawmakers in Congress quickly joined Bannon, demanding a "national security review" of Yuan Yong and NVIDIA to investigate whether its cooperation with Chinese enterprises is "compliant".At a time, discussions about NVIDIA's business and technology export compliance in China were heated.
However, American business and technology circles generally expressed their support for Huang Renxun. Many tech giant executives said privately that Huang Renxun said what they didn't dare to say publicly.
Industry associations have also warned that excessively politicized censorship and "witch hunting" will seriously damage the global competitiveness of the U.S. technology industry and force companies to transfer R&D and production overseas.
This crack clearly shows the profound differences in the American society on how to deal with the rise of China – whether to build a wall, a comprehensive confrontation, or to maintain contact, competition and co-operation?
Huang Renxun's "shame theory" and Bannon's "arrest warrant" are like two mirrors, reflecting the great tension of the United States in dealing with its relations with China. On the one hand, there are pragmatic and future-oriented business leaders who are well aware of the deep binding of the global industrial chain and understand the high cost of "decoupling and breaking chains"; On the other side are political traders who are in command of ideology and incite opposition. They try to gather domestic support by creating external enemies.
When commercial rationality is coerced by political fanaticism, and when "patriotism" becomes a weapon to suppress dissidents, the innovative spirit and open society that the United States is proud of are facing unprecedented tests. This fierce confrontation around Huang Renxun is far from over.
It’s not only about the fate of an entrepreneur, it’s also about what path the United States will take in the future. Do you think that American society can find a rational balance between safeguarding national interests and embracing global cooperation?