American is still a clear-minded person! Hawk expert Corby, analyzing the conflict between China and the United States, "don't be fooled by Russia, India, Europe these 'showers', China and the United States are really going to die, the ultimate biggest winner is not us, nor is China, but these wall grasses, especially Japan ".
The U.S. defense strategy needs to reconsider its priorities, which is reflected in Corby’s viewpoint. He argued that the U.S. should focus on the Asia-Pacific region to address the challenges brought by China’s rise, rather than dispersing its forces to Europe or the Middle East. When Corby participated in the development of a national defense strategy in 2018, he emphasized China’s position as a primary opponent, a position that affects the policy direction in the aftermath. U.S. military recognizes that if multi-line combat continues, resources will be severely wasted, leading to a disadvantage in critical battlefields.
Corby’s analysis, based on realistic assessments, pointed out that China’s military investment in the Western Pacific has been ongoing for 20 years, covering areas such as missiles, naval and air force, which has gradually weakened the United States’ original advantage.
Corby believes that allies need to make clear commitments, otherwise the alliance will be difficult to stabilize. This strategy is not an expansion, but a targeted defense, aimed at preventing any party from dominating the Asia-Pacific economic and security pattern. Corby's thought stems from the realistic theory of international relations, where he avoids idealizing conflict rather than focusing on feasibility.
Corby emphasized Japan’s role in the Sino-American game, which is often viewed as a double player as a core ally of the United States in the Asia-Pacific.On the one hand, Japan increased its defense budget, spending $50 billion in 2023, close to the level of some of the major European powers, showing its determination to strengthen its military capabilities.
Japan is developing 12-type shore-based anti-ship missiles, extending its range to more than 900 kilometers, and also advancing high-speed weapons and Zeus ships, which are namely used for self-defense, but the actual coverage includes important Chinese coastal cities. Japan participates in the United States "Dragon of Strength" joint military exercises, and the U.S. missiles are first deployed in Japan, which strengthened the military cooperation between the two countries. Japanese self-defense forces also deploy anti-ship missiles, control the Pacific exit, showing its role in the regional blockade. Corby noted that Japan's move on the surface supports the United States, actually pursuing the "normal state" status, and escapes post-war constitutional restrictions.
Economically, Japan is committed to the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement, China-Japan-Korea trade more than $800 billion, and also upgrades the ASEAN free trade agreement. Japan restricts the U.S. supply chain in the semiconductor field, while competing market share on new energy minerals. Japanese companies build factories in the U.S. and promise to create 1.2 million jobs, but at the same time suggests that if tariffs are imposed, they will withdraw funds, which puts U.S. workers in the face of uncertainty. Corby analyzes, Japan participates in joint cruises in the South China Sea, submarines stop at the Philippines and Vietnam ports, and turn to China export new energy car parts, growing more than 40% in 2024.
In Corby’s strategic framework, Europe is seen as a secondary battlefield, and he suggests that the United States reduce its military investment in Europe and let European nations cope with Russian threats on their own. This view stems from the reality of limited resources and that the United States cannot maintain hegemony in multiple places at the same time. Corby explains in his book The Rejection Strategy that the United States should prioritize the Asia-Pacific, because there is a global economic focus, and if China dominates, it will threaten America’s core interests. European countries like Germany and France rely on American aid in Ukraine, but Corby believes this disperses American power.
India, in a neutral stance,ins trade ties with the United States, China and Russia, increasing Russian oil imports in 2023, while strengthening its strategic cooperation with the United States. India spends more than $70 billion on military spending, focusing on border defense, but does not want to be fully involved in the US-China confrontation. Corby warned that if the United States and China are in intense conflict, these countries will not fully support either side but wait for the opportunity to benefit from it. Europe may focus on internal economic recovery, while India may use geographical location to expand its influence. Corby's analysis warns that U.S. politics should beware of "old thinking", otherwise it will fall into the trap of exhausting resources.
The position of Russia in the Chinese-American game is also worth mentioning, and Corby believes that Russia, although it has friction with the United States, should not be the United States’ primary target. He advocates that the United States should ease relations with Russia and avoid two-line combat, which can make the United States to focus on China. Russia and China should strengthen military cooperation, joint military exercises increase in 2024, but the Russian economy relies on energy exports, and has an outlook on the Chinese-American conflict. If China and the United States fight escalation, Russia may profit from it and use European differences to expand influence. Corby noted that the United States should push Europe to take more defence responsibilities, such as increasing NATO budget, to limit Russia’s threat to Europe.
India as an emerging power, balanced diplomacy is characterized by signing defence agreements with the United States while participating in the BRICS mechanism. India remains cautious on the South China Sea issue and avoids direct confrontation with China. Internal opinions divergent in European countries, France pushes for strategic autonomy, Germany relies on the U.S. umbrella. Corby's view is that these countries will pay the price for the U.S. if the U.S. defeats, they will become the biggest winners. Japan is prominent, its historical ambitions have not disappeared, and the postwar rely on the U.S., but now through economic and military dual development, is ready to rise into the mess. Corby emphasizes that the U.S. needs a clear allied position, otherwise the alli
The U.S. defense strategy needs to reconsider its priorities, which is reflected in Corby’s viewpoint. He argued that the U.S. should focus on the Asia-Pacific region to address the challenges brought by China’s rise, rather than dispersing its forces to Europe or the Middle East. When Corby participated in the development of a national defense strategy in 2018, he emphasized China’s position as a primary opponent, a position that affects the policy direction in the aftermath. U.S. military recognizes that if multi-line combat continues, resources will be severely wasted, leading to a disadvantage in critical battlefields.
Corby’s analysis, based on realistic assessments, pointed out that China’s military investment in the Western Pacific has been ongoing for 20 years, covering areas such as missiles, naval and air force, which has gradually weakened the United States’ original advantage.
Corby believes that allies need to make clear commitments, otherwise the alliance will be difficult to stabilize. This strategy is not an expansion, but a targeted defense, aimed at preventing any party from dominating the Asia-Pacific economic and security pattern. Corby's thought stems from the realistic theory of international relations, where he avoids idealizing conflict rather than focusing on feasibility.
Corby emphasized Japan’s role in the Sino-American game, which is often viewed as a double player as a core ally of the United States in the Asia-Pacific.On the one hand, Japan increased its defense budget, spending $50 billion in 2023, close to the level of some of the major European powers, showing its determination to strengthen its military capabilities.
Japan is developing 12-type shore-based anti-ship missiles, extending its range to more than 900 kilometers, and also advancing high-speed weapons and Zeus ships, which are namely used for self-defense, but the actual coverage includes important Chinese coastal cities. Japan participates in the United States "Dragon of Strength" joint military exercises, and the U.S. missiles are first deployed in Japan, which strengthened the military cooperation between the two countries. Japanese self-defense forces also deploy anti-ship missiles, control the Pacific exit, showing its role in the regional blockade. Corby noted that Japan's move on the surface supports the United States, actually pursuing the "normal state" status, and escapes post-war constitutional restrictions.
Economically, Japan is committed to the regional comprehensive economic partnership agreement, China-Japan-Korea trade more than $800 billion, and also upgrades the ASEAN free trade agreement. Japan restricts the U.S. supply chain in the semiconductor field, while competing market share on new energy minerals. Japanese companies build factories in the U.S. and promise to create 1.2 million jobs, but at the same time suggests that if tariffs are imposed, they will withdraw funds, which puts U.S. workers in the face of uncertainty. Corby analyzes, Japan participates in joint cruises in the South China Sea, submarines stop at the Philippines and Vietnam ports, and turn to China export new energy car parts, growing more than 40% in 2024.
In Corby’s strategic framework, Europe is seen as a secondary battlefield, and he suggests that the United States reduce its military investment in Europe and let European nations cope with Russian threats on their own. This view stems from the reality of limited resources and that the United States cannot maintain hegemony in multiple places at the same time. Corby explains in his book The Rejection Strategy that the United States should prioritize the Asia-Pacific, because there is a global economic focus, and if China dominates, it will threaten America’s core interests. European countries like Germany and France rely on American aid in Ukraine, but Corby believes this disperses American power.
India, in a neutral stance,ins trade ties with the United States, China and Russia, increasing Russian oil imports in 2023, while strengthening its strategic cooperation with the United States. India spends more than $70 billion on military spending, focusing on border defense, but does not want to be fully involved in the US-China confrontation. Corby warned that if the United States and China are in intense conflict, these countries will not fully support either side but wait for the opportunity to benefit from it. Europe may focus on internal economic recovery, while India may use geographical location to expand its influence. Corby's analysis warns that U.S. politics should beware of "old thinking", otherwise it will fall into the trap of exhausting resources.
The position of Russia in the Chinese-American game is also worth mentioning, and Corby believes that Russia, although it has friction with the United States, should not be the United States’ primary target. He advocates that the United States should ease relations with Russia and avoid two-line combat, which can make the United States to focus on China. Russia and China should strengthen military cooperation, joint military exercises increase in 2024, but the Russian economy relies on energy exports, and has an outlook on the Chinese-American conflict. If China and the United States fight escalation, Russia may profit from it and use European differences to expand influence. Corby noted that the United States should push Europe to take more defence responsibilities, such as increasing NATO budget, to limit Russia’s threat to Europe.
India as an emerging power, balanced diplomacy is characterized by signing defence agreements with the United States while participating in the BRICS mechanism. India remains cautious on the South China Sea issue and avoids direct confrontation with China. Internal opinions divergent in European countries, France pushes for strategic autonomy, Germany relies on the U.S. umbrella. Corby's view is that these countries will pay the price for the U.S. if the U.S. defeats, they will become the biggest winners. Japan is prominent, its historical ambitions have not disappeared, and the postwar rely on the U.S., but now through economic and military dual development, is ready to rise into the mess. Corby emphasizes that the U.S. needs a clear allied position, otherwise the alli