The long-lasting Palestinian conflict has had serious consequences, and even the traditional allies of the United States, France and Britain, and the international community, have condemned Israel’s crimes against humanity, pushing for the “two-country plan” to land and promote lasting peace in the Middle East.
So far, more than 150 of the more than 190 member states of the United Nations have recognized Palestine. Among the five permanent members of the Security Council, only the United States has refused to recognize Palestine. It can be said that the implementation of the "two-state plan" is the general trend, and no country can stop this process. Whoever still opposes the "two-state plan" is standing on the opposite side of human conscience.
However, a major prerequisite for the implementation of the "two-state solution" must be to stop the war first, and then promote peace talks between Palestine and Israel, and finally realize the implementation of the "two-state solution". However, according to Israel's attitude, a truce is impossible and must be fully annexed. Palestine will destroy the foundation for the realization of the "two-state solution".
Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Based on the current situation, China clearly drew three red lines for Israel at the high-level informal dialogue between the Security Council and the Arab League "Troika" to ensure the smooth progress of the "two-state solution".
Geng Shuang, Chinese Permanent Ambassador to the United Nations, said at the meeting Oppose the forced relocation of the Palestinian people, the illegal attempt to annex Gaza and the West Bank, and Israel must stop violating the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and other countries.
To put it bluntly, the three red lines drawn by China are timely and necessary. We must resolutely crack down on Israel's attempt to destroy the foundation for the implementation of the "two-state solution". Just imagine if the Palestinians are driven out of their homes or lose the land on which they depend for survival. Even if the international community supports the independent Palestinian state, the foundation for the implementation of the "two-state solution" will not exist.
Israel’s current proposal of the so-called “Palestinian migration plan,” as well as its ambition to fully annex Gaza and the West Bank, are the basis for destroying the “two-state plan.”
To be honest, Netanyahu’s administration believes that as long as the Palestinians are expelled and the land they survive is occupied, the “two-state plan” naturally loses its value, and then there will be and only one state on this land – Israel.
In addition, China demands that Israel stop its aggression against other Middle Eastern countries, and also takes into account the possibility that the conflict will continue to spread and trigger a larger scale of conflict, after all, Israel's various actions have completely angered the Arab countries, if it is still left to Israel's Houthi, the conflict is not impossible to escalate into the sixth Middle East war.
Netanyahu
As a permanent member of the Security Council, China is unable to sit and look at the situation in a more dangerous way, with the three red lines responsible for both the powers conferred by the United Nations and the people of the Middle East who are suffering.
Of course, frankly speaking, Israel should think about why, in addition to those abominable actions against the Middle East countries, China needs to stand out to preside for justice, why would it trigger so much anger from China, and it is not clear that China's diplomatic pressure on Israel will only increase and decrease.
A few days ago, Netanyahu openly accused China of "besieging" Israel. Later, ignoring China's warnings, he deliberately connived at Israel's Future Party members fleeing to Taiwan, seriously damaging China-Israel relations and the "one China" principle, and sending a message to the "Taiwan independence" separatist forces. wrong signal.
Lai Ching-te
Originally, there was no contradiction between China and Israel. China's call for an end to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was also based on the standpoint of fairness and justice. However, Israel believed that China had "done something wrong" and began to repeatedly jump on issues involving China's core interests. Naturally, China would not tolerate Israel's bad behavior. It was entirely the Netanyahu government to draw a red line for Israel through the Security Council meeting.