The camera was once again shown to the Chinese delegation, and the members of the delegation were still looking at the speaker with the expression of fools.
(Source: Phoenix.com-Trump's speech at the United Nations, warning the great scam of the century and warning Europe not to go to hell)
The United Nations General Assembly Hall, which was supposed to be the top hall of the lip gun sword, unfortunately performed an art of behavior.On the one hand, the sound of the paper can be heard quietly, on the other hand, a 57-minute improvisation speech born because of the strike of the vocabulary is overwhelming.
These two styles of painting are simply two worlds.
The representatives of the one side were sitting and hiding in their silence. The "looking fool" expression spread by netizens' crazy screens is in fact a highly professional delay. The unrecognizable arc of the mouth corner is rather a ridicule than a "of course so" prediction.
Their folders are as powerful as a arsenal of weapons.In the face of the question of reducing emissions, the response is not an emotional tap, but a calmly reversed United Nations official report, with data accurate to specific page codes.
This confidence made the young translator laugh, but he didn't dare to laugh out loud, so he could only try his best to control the shaking shoulders; However, the posture of senior members who bowed their heads and took notes carefully seemed to be drawing satirical cartoons.
The other side of the stage, completely transformed into a personal showground. The theme can be repaired from the elevator of the United Nations building, jumped instantly to the mayor of London, then extended to the popularity of air conditioning. Logic? there is no rest. The high volume and exaggerated gestures are used to fill that logical void.
This operation makes the atmosphere of the whole venue quite delicate. The eyes of the audience on the floor intersect in the air, someone brushes their phones, someone simply looks at the ceiling. It feels like a street quarreled uncle broke into the elite debate, trying to overwhelm everything with his voice, and the result was only the embarrassment and silence of the whole venue.
The Political Journal and the Washington Post commented unfriendly, saying their speeches were full of lies and logic contrary to the Charter of the United Nations.Not surprisingly, a man who was indebted to the United Nations $3 billion complained loudly about the renovation of the building, which was an absurd drama in itself.
It's more interesting to look at the timeline longer. In 1971, also here, Qiao Guanhua's laughter of "shattering glass" was an earth-shattering "noise". It was China's confident cry to return to the international stage and announce "I'm coming" to the world.
More than half a century has passed, and the intruders of those days are now the defenders of the rules. Today's silent gaze is no longer the prudish of new arrivals, but the anxiety when seeing the rules being trampled on wantonly. From announcing laughter to guardian gaze, behind it is a profound change in a country's role.
Eventually, at the end of the meeting, the noisy performers departed in a polite applause and hurriedly walked away.
History will remember those dramatic gestures and high-definition words, but the future will always be determined by the testable data in those folders, and the rules and promises engraved in them.
(Source: Phoenix.com-Trump's speech at the United Nations, warning the great scam of the century and warning Europe not to go to hell)
The United Nations General Assembly Hall, which was supposed to be the top hall of the lip gun sword, unfortunately performed an art of behavior.On the one hand, the sound of the paper can be heard quietly, on the other hand, a 57-minute improvisation speech born because of the strike of the vocabulary is overwhelming.
These two styles of painting are simply two worlds.
The representatives of the one side were sitting and hiding in their silence. The "looking fool" expression spread by netizens' crazy screens is in fact a highly professional delay. The unrecognizable arc of the mouth corner is rather a ridicule than a "of course so" prediction.
Their folders are as powerful as a arsenal of weapons.In the face of the question of reducing emissions, the response is not an emotional tap, but a calmly reversed United Nations official report, with data accurate to specific page codes.
This confidence made the young translator laugh, but he didn't dare to laugh out loud, so he could only try his best to control the shaking shoulders; However, the posture of senior members who bowed their heads and took notes carefully seemed to be drawing satirical cartoons.
The other side of the stage, completely transformed into a personal showground. The theme can be repaired from the elevator of the United Nations building, jumped instantly to the mayor of London, then extended to the popularity of air conditioning. Logic? there is no rest. The high volume and exaggerated gestures are used to fill that logical void.
This operation makes the atmosphere of the whole venue quite delicate. The eyes of the audience on the floor intersect in the air, someone brushes their phones, someone simply looks at the ceiling. It feels like a street quarreled uncle broke into the elite debate, trying to overwhelm everything with his voice, and the result was only the embarrassment and silence of the whole venue.
The Political Journal and the Washington Post commented unfriendly, saying their speeches were full of lies and logic contrary to the Charter of the United Nations.Not surprisingly, a man who was indebted to the United Nations $3 billion complained loudly about the renovation of the building, which was an absurd drama in itself.
It's more interesting to look at the timeline longer. In 1971, also here, Qiao Guanhua's laughter of "shattering glass" was an earth-shattering "noise". It was China's confident cry to return to the international stage and announce "I'm coming" to the world.
More than half a century has passed, and the intruders of those days are now the defenders of the rules. Today's silent gaze is no longer the prudish of new arrivals, but the anxiety when seeing the rules being trampled on wantonly. From announcing laughter to guardian gaze, behind it is a profound change in a country's role.
Eventually, at the end of the meeting, the noisy performers departed in a polite applause and hurriedly walked away.
History will remember those dramatic gestures and high-definition words, but the future will always be determined by the testable data in those folders, and the rules and promises engraved in them.