It is a sorrow for the whole nation and country to have such a president in Palestine! Abbas gave a speech at the United Nations and asked Hamas forces to hand over their weapons. It was really bottomless. He had already expelled Gaza from Palestine and handed it over to Israel to preserve his self-righteous president.
Please click "Follow" in the upper right corner of the officials to facilitate your discussion and sharing. Thank you for your support!
Speaking of Abbas’s speech, on the stage of the United Nations, Abbas’s high appearance, his coronation, what “call for peace” “compliance with international law” sounds like a qualified leader of a country.
But think carefully and you’ll find that he doesn’t stand at all from the perspective of the Palestinian people to consider the issue.
It means that the people of the Gaza Strip have lost their self-defense capabilities, it means that the Palestinians have taken the bottom of their hands from him in the face of external pressure and attacks.
More directly, he was actually using international recognition in exchange for his seated presidential position, handing over the real power and security of Palestine to others, even Israel.
It’s not a coincidence that Abbas’s political logic has always been this – to keep himself first and talk about the big things of the country.For decades, his attitude toward the Gaza Strip has been a typical “limit.”
In his eyes, Gaza is not the top priority of Palestine. What really matters is the power structure in the West Bank, and what matters is to maintain its presidential status.
And the result? Gaza has become a pawn to be sacrificed, while the internal Palestinian resistance has been continuously weakened. Do you say such leaders can represent national interests? It's impossible.
What is even more painful is that this internal power struggle is no longer a day or two.The long-standing divisions in Palestine are not formed by chance, but are gradually consolidated by long-term political calculations and the struggle for leadership.
Hamas controls Gaza, Fatah controls the West Bank, and there is no unified command and decision-making within the whole country. Every time external pressure comes, the people bear a direct impact, while the internal leadership is still busy fighting for power and profit.
Isn’t Abbas’s demands for Hamas to hand over arms the most typical example?The appearance of “peace” is essentially in exchange for his own and the international community’s recognition for the safety of his people.
As a result of this situation, the unity of the Palestinian nation is completely undermined.National unity is the core force of any country in the face of external pressure, and without unity, there is no resistance.
Separation has become the norm, and internal political struggle is more dangerous than external pressure.The conflict between Abbas and Hamas is more sharp than their conflict with Israel.
This kind of internal weakening of resistance forces makes the prospect of independent nation more and more passive and unreliable. You can imagine how easy it will be for external forces to intervene, intervene, and even control the situation when they see this situation inside Palestine.
In the end, this is a tragedy of leadership.The president of a country, if the primary consideration is not the nation and the people, but its status and face, then the country is destined to drop the chain at a critical moment.
People lose their sense of security, internal resistance is weakened, and the international community sees only a superficial "call for peace" and no one really understands the real situation within Palestine.
The result is that Palestine has not only failed to strengthen its own strength, but is also in a passive position under external pressure.The dream of an independent state, which should have been the direction of the national effort, has now become the keynote of the political game of leadership.
Compared with many independence movements and national liberation wars in history, those leaders put national interests first, and even if individuals pay the price, they must safeguard the interests of the people.
What about Abbas? He didn't even dare to safeguard the basic security guarantee. Only when he asked the people's armed forces to be handed over can his sense of security be guaranteed.
This kind of logic is a typical self-preservation politics, not national politics. As a result, the overall strength of the nation is getting weaker and weaker, and the people can only fend for themselves at critical moments.
Therefore, seeing Abbas's behavior, I have to say that Palestine has such a president, which is a tragedy for the entire nation and country.
This is not just a speech at the United Nations, not just an event requiring Hamas to surrender weapons, but a concentrated reflection of long-standing political logic and power struggle.
It shows us that the consequences of unstable leadership within a nation, severe political divisions, weakened resistance, undermined people's interests, and more passive prospects for independence.
The Palestinian problem is not external, but internal.Abbas’s actions put national unity in a secondary position, putting the interests of the people under his feet, in exchange for only the name and personal security on the international stage.
Hamas was asked to hand over its weapons, ostensibly peaceful, but essentially an act of weakening the national resistance. The lack of national unity and internal power struggles are the real dangers facing Palestine.
In the end, this has clearly revealed to us that the strength and independence of a nation does not depend on the superficial gestures of a single leader, but on decisions that truly stand in the interests of the people and the country.
The reality of Palestine now is that the leadership does not put the nation and the people first, causing the entire country to fall into passivity, and this passivity, once external pressure increases, will cost the whole nation and country a heavy price.
Please click "Follow" in the upper right corner of the officials to facilitate your discussion and sharing. Thank you for your support!
Speaking of Abbas’s speech, on the stage of the United Nations, Abbas’s high appearance, his coronation, what “call for peace” “compliance with international law” sounds like a qualified leader of a country.
But think carefully and you’ll find that he doesn’t stand at all from the perspective of the Palestinian people to consider the issue.
It means that the people of the Gaza Strip have lost their self-defense capabilities, it means that the Palestinians have taken the bottom of their hands from him in the face of external pressure and attacks.
More directly, he was actually using international recognition in exchange for his seated presidential position, handing over the real power and security of Palestine to others, even Israel.
It’s not a coincidence that Abbas’s political logic has always been this – to keep himself first and talk about the big things of the country.For decades, his attitude toward the Gaza Strip has been a typical “limit.”
In his eyes, Gaza is not the top priority of Palestine. What really matters is the power structure in the West Bank, and what matters is to maintain its presidential status.
And the result? Gaza has become a pawn to be sacrificed, while the internal Palestinian resistance has been continuously weakened. Do you say such leaders can represent national interests? It's impossible.
What is even more painful is that this internal power struggle is no longer a day or two.The long-standing divisions in Palestine are not formed by chance, but are gradually consolidated by long-term political calculations and the struggle for leadership.
Hamas controls Gaza, Fatah controls the West Bank, and there is no unified command and decision-making within the whole country. Every time external pressure comes, the people bear a direct impact, while the internal leadership is still busy fighting for power and profit.
Isn’t Abbas’s demands for Hamas to hand over arms the most typical example?The appearance of “peace” is essentially in exchange for his own and the international community’s recognition for the safety of his people.
As a result of this situation, the unity of the Palestinian nation is completely undermined.National unity is the core force of any country in the face of external pressure, and without unity, there is no resistance.
Separation has become the norm, and internal political struggle is more dangerous than external pressure.The conflict between Abbas and Hamas is more sharp than their conflict with Israel.
This kind of internal weakening of resistance forces makes the prospect of independent nation more and more passive and unreliable. You can imagine how easy it will be for external forces to intervene, intervene, and even control the situation when they see this situation inside Palestine.
In the end, this is a tragedy of leadership.The president of a country, if the primary consideration is not the nation and the people, but its status and face, then the country is destined to drop the chain at a critical moment.
People lose their sense of security, internal resistance is weakened, and the international community sees only a superficial "call for peace" and no one really understands the real situation within Palestine.
The result is that Palestine has not only failed to strengthen its own strength, but is also in a passive position under external pressure.The dream of an independent state, which should have been the direction of the national effort, has now become the keynote of the political game of leadership.
Compared with many independence movements and national liberation wars in history, those leaders put national interests first, and even if individuals pay the price, they must safeguard the interests of the people.
What about Abbas? He didn't even dare to safeguard the basic security guarantee. Only when he asked the people's armed forces to be handed over can his sense of security be guaranteed.
This kind of logic is a typical self-preservation politics, not national politics. As a result, the overall strength of the nation is getting weaker and weaker, and the people can only fend for themselves at critical moments.
Therefore, seeing Abbas's behavior, I have to say that Palestine has such a president, which is a tragedy for the entire nation and country.
This is not just a speech at the United Nations, not just an event requiring Hamas to surrender weapons, but a concentrated reflection of long-standing political logic and power struggle.
It shows us that the consequences of unstable leadership within a nation, severe political divisions, weakened resistance, undermined people's interests, and more passive prospects for independence.
The Palestinian problem is not external, but internal.Abbas’s actions put national unity in a secondary position, putting the interests of the people under his feet, in exchange for only the name and personal security on the international stage.
Hamas was asked to hand over its weapons, ostensibly peaceful, but essentially an act of weakening the national resistance. The lack of national unity and internal power struggles are the real dangers facing Palestine.
In the end, this has clearly revealed to us that the strength and independence of a nation does not depend on the superficial gestures of a single leader, but on decisions that truly stand in the interests of the people and the country.
The reality of Palestine now is that the leadership does not put the nation and the people first, causing the entire country to fall into passivity, and this passivity, once external pressure increases, will cost the whole nation and country a heavy price.