Zelensky said in the opening speech of the General Assembly that "without China, Russia is nothing", the voice fell, and the Chinese representatives did not even lift the eye.
In the light of the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly, Ukrainian President Zelensky threw a heavy statement: "Without the support of certain countries, it is difficult for Russia to maintain a special military operation."
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
It has not been named directly, but the eyes on the scene have turned to the seats of the Chinese delegation.
Chinese representatives have alwaysined an iconic calm gesture, which makes a subtle contrast to the fierce words on the stage.
Zelensky's statement coincided with the stalemate in Ukraine's counteroffensive.
Internal reports from the German military show that the country's inventory of PzH-2000 self-propelled artillery spare parts can only maintain operational needs for three weeks; The US $60 billion aid bill is caught in a tug-of-war in Congress; The latest number of F-16 fighters delivered by the Netherlands is 40% lower than promised.
The number of Lancet cruise missiles recently invested by the Russian army in the direction of Donetsk has tripled year-on-year. This battlefield pressure has forced Kiev to seek new diplomatic breakthroughs.
In contrast to the Ukrainian statement, the special envoy of China for Eurasia has recently completed the third round of cross-border missions, followed by visits to Moscow, Kiev and Brussels.
China’s position on the political settlement of the crisis in Ukraine, the first three articles emphasize “respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries”, “armistice” and “start peace talks”.
China’s representative to the United Nations said in a follow-up speech that “the end of any conflict ultimately requires a peace agreement, not a military victory.”
There are two solutions available to the international community: the first is the US-West’s advocacy of “pressing change” and weakening Russia’s negotiation code through continued military assistance; the second is China’s advocacy of “balanced security”, which is to build a new security architecture based on guaranteeing the reasonable security concerns of all parties.
Sources from the Russian Foreign Ministry revealed that the Chinese special envoy put forward a road map for "easing the situation in stages" in the closed-door meeting, including specific measures such as establishing humanitarian corridors first and gradually transitioning to war zone isolation.
But the road to peace is still full of thorns.
Borrell, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, recently said frankly: "The gap between the positions of the two sides is still like a gap".
Ukraine insists on the unshakable border line of 1991, while Russia demands recognition of the new territorial reality.
The U.S. defense budget for fiscal year 2024 still has $3.4 billion earmarked for military aid to Ukraine, and the military-industrial complex continues to profit from the conflict. According to data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute in Sweden, the average increase of global military stocks has reached 87% since the outbreak of the conflict.
During the multilateral consultations held in Geneva, Switzerland, Chinese representatives refused to sign any joint statement containing the sanctions and opposed proposals to exclude Russia from the international financial system.
This position has sparked criticism from the West, but has been widely understood by Southern countries around the world. Experts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Indonesia point out: “China is demonstrating that not choosing a frontier team can also be a constructive mediator.”
"China's preservation of determination is the responsibility of the great powers."
“Peace requires practical action, not empty slogans.”
"If you are really worried about China and Russia approaching, the West should come up with a more pragmatic plan"
Many countries, including China, are brewing a new round of Istanbul talks.
In contrast to previous negotiations, this will be the first time to introduce an innovative mechanism of "food security in exchange for a ceasefire" in exchange for a local ceasefire arrangement.
This diplomatic game reflects the profound contradictions of the transitional period of the international order.
As traditional powers attempt to consolidate their positions through military superiority, emerging powers strive to build new types of conflict resolution mechanisms.
The silence of China's representatives at the United Nations may have responded to the wisdom of the "non-combat and humiliation of soldiers" in the "sonny boy law", the real diplomatic influence, never the generous statements under the light of the light, but the substantial advancement at the negotiating table.
How do you think the international community should balance the relationship between military aid and peaceful mediation?
Welcome to share in the commentary!
In the light of the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly, Ukrainian President Zelensky threw a heavy statement: "Without the support of certain countries, it is difficult for Russia to maintain a special military operation."
Trouble readers to tap the upper right corner of the "attention", leave your wonderful comment with everyone to explore, thank you for your strong support!
It has not been named directly, but the eyes on the scene have turned to the seats of the Chinese delegation.
Chinese representatives have alwaysined an iconic calm gesture, which makes a subtle contrast to the fierce words on the stage.
Zelensky's statement coincided with the stalemate in Ukraine's counteroffensive.
Internal reports from the German military show that the country's inventory of PzH-2000 self-propelled artillery spare parts can only maintain operational needs for three weeks; The US $60 billion aid bill is caught in a tug-of-war in Congress; The latest number of F-16 fighters delivered by the Netherlands is 40% lower than promised.
The number of Lancet cruise missiles recently invested by the Russian army in the direction of Donetsk has tripled year-on-year. This battlefield pressure has forced Kiev to seek new diplomatic breakthroughs.
In contrast to the Ukrainian statement, the special envoy of China for Eurasia has recently completed the third round of cross-border missions, followed by visits to Moscow, Kiev and Brussels.
China’s position on the political settlement of the crisis in Ukraine, the first three articles emphasize “respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries”, “armistice” and “start peace talks”.
China’s representative to the United Nations said in a follow-up speech that “the end of any conflict ultimately requires a peace agreement, not a military victory.”
There are two solutions available to the international community: the first is the US-West’s advocacy of “pressing change” and weakening Russia’s negotiation code through continued military assistance; the second is China’s advocacy of “balanced security”, which is to build a new security architecture based on guaranteeing the reasonable security concerns of all parties.
Sources from the Russian Foreign Ministry revealed that the Chinese special envoy put forward a road map for "easing the situation in stages" in the closed-door meeting, including specific measures such as establishing humanitarian corridors first and gradually transitioning to war zone isolation.
But the road to peace is still full of thorns.
Borrell, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, recently said frankly: "The gap between the positions of the two sides is still like a gap".
Ukraine insists on the unshakable border line of 1991, while Russia demands recognition of the new territorial reality.
The U.S. defense budget for fiscal year 2024 still has $3.4 billion earmarked for military aid to Ukraine, and the military-industrial complex continues to profit from the conflict. According to data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute in Sweden, the average increase of global military stocks has reached 87% since the outbreak of the conflict.
During the multilateral consultations held in Geneva, Switzerland, Chinese representatives refused to sign any joint statement containing the sanctions and opposed proposals to exclude Russia from the international financial system.
This position has sparked criticism from the West, but has been widely understood by Southern countries around the world. Experts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Indonesia point out: “China is demonstrating that not choosing a frontier team can also be a constructive mediator.”
"China's preservation of determination is the responsibility of the great powers."
“Peace requires practical action, not empty slogans.”
"If you are really worried about China and Russia approaching, the West should come up with a more pragmatic plan"
Many countries, including China, are brewing a new round of Istanbul talks.
In contrast to previous negotiations, this will be the first time to introduce an innovative mechanism of "food security in exchange for a ceasefire" in exchange for a local ceasefire arrangement.
This diplomatic game reflects the profound contradictions of the transitional period of the international order.
As traditional powers attempt to consolidate their positions through military superiority, emerging powers strive to build new types of conflict resolution mechanisms.
The silence of China's representatives at the United Nations may have responded to the wisdom of the "non-combat and humiliation of soldiers" in the "sonny boy law", the real diplomatic influence, never the generous statements under the light of the light, but the substantial advancement at the negotiating table.
How do you think the international community should balance the relationship between military aid and peaceful mediation?
Welcome to share in the commentary!