The podium of the United Nations General Assembly has never lacked drama, but this time, the protagonist is not the United States and Russia, nor Ukraine, but Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz.
He announced in front of hundreds of diplomatic representatives around the world that the air battle that was supposed to be “6:0” was “7:0” and thanked China for its support.
Who said that the UN General Assembly can only speak diplomatic rhetoric? Shahbaz's "war damage update" has once again focused the attention of the entire international community on South Asia.
And how many doorways are hidden in this confrontation from the sky to the conference hall? Why was India "broken"? Who is silently trading and laying out behind the scenes?
On the ground, on the ground.
At the time of the United Nations General Assembly, Pakistani Prime Minister Khabaz did not have the choice to contain. He not only refreshed the performance of the air war with public discourse, but also placed the conflict on the global stage.
The "6: 0" result originally thought by the outside world was corrected to "7: 0" by him himself, which not only added the shooting down data of one more fighter plane, but also added a strategic meaning.
More interestingly, he used a very picturesque rhetoric in his speech, describing the air war as "on the blue sky, the Falcon is open, and the seven enemy aircraft are shattered into fragments."
This is not a mere trick, but a carefully arranged narrative strategy - packaging hard nuclear warfare with poetic language, seizing the heights of morality and public opinion in international occasions.
At the same time, the reaction of the Indian delegation was to blow up the pot. First-class Secretary Petar Garrot spoke immediately, calling Shabaz’s speech a “absurd play.”
This rebuttal seems fierce, but in fact it is the helplessness of "hard mouth". Because the details of this air battle have been uncovered by various media and military agencies.
The British "Air Force Monthly" in front of the October edition, in advance disclosed some of the findings of the investigation: India lost not only three "Fighting Wind" aircraft, but four.
What is even more embarrassing is that in addition to the four "Rafales" that were shot down or scrapped, four fighters of the same model were seriously damaged, and it has not been confirmed whether their combat effectiveness has been restored so far.
This means that a high-intensity attack by the Indian Air Force, at least half of the "wind" combat force was cut off, and this batch of aircraft was the "door-to-door" of the Indian Air Force of the new century, each of which is not worthwhile.
Behind the defeat was not only a technical problem, but also a complete collapse of the command system and the perception of the battlefield.
Not just to win, but to hurt
If the outcome of the war embarrassed India, then the technological system behind tactics made India even more "defence-free".
According to the subsequent information disclosure, from May 5 to 10, the Pakistani Air Force not only deployed the main-powered Chinese-supported aircraft such as the J-10C and the Qinglong fighter aircraft in the air, but also implemented system-level electronic warfare and cyber interference.
Within just a few days, the Indian military’s communications links, navigation systems, and radar early warning successively encountered “black dwarf”, causing its air force to become almost “blind” in the air war.
The genius of this electronic warfare is that it is not a single breakthrough, but a “chain cut” – from satellite signal blocking, to ground command link suppression, India’s “killing chain” is completely paralyzed and can’t form effective synergies at all.
And behind this, the shadow of China-Pakistan military cooperation is clearly visible. the J-10C and the "Dragon" are not only China's R&D and production, but also supports the integrated platform for early warning systems, electronic interference and long-range strike created jointly by China-Pakistan.
Such systematic combat capabilities are the key shortcomings of India, which have long been lacking but difficult to repair, and it is not surprising that in the months after the war, the Indian military and government have always refrained from responding to air warfare.
Faced with questions from domestic opposition parties, the Indian Defense Ministry’s response was either vague or simply skipping the topic.
Outside the battlefield, on the chessboard
At the beginning of September, Pakistani Prime Minister Shabaz visited Beijing, with a high-quality reception from China, and jointly issued the “China-Pakistani Fate Community Action Plan (2025-2029)”, which made it clear to build a higher level of political mutual trust and economic cooperation.
Among them, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has also entered the "version 2.0", which not only continues to promote traditional projects such as energy and transportation, but also begins to deeply connect with Pakistan's "5Es" development framework, covering emerging fields such as education, environment and e-commerce.
And what makes India more alert is the U.S. attitude change.The U.S. has always regarded India as the "Indo-Pacific point" and has recently released a sudden signal to Pakistan.
During the UN conference, U.S. President Donald Trump specifically invited Khabaz to a closed-door meeting at the White House for up to 80 minutes, accompanied by Pakistani Army Chief of Staff Ashim Munir.
Immediately afterwards, the U.S. military successively invited senior officials of the Pakistani Air Force and Army to visit the United States, triggering a "uncomfortable reaction" from the Indian media. After all, this kind of scenario hasn't been common in the past few years.
Pakistan, once treated coldly by the United States, is now back on the table because of the battlefield performance and geostrategy, which is very bad for India.
In the past, India fought for the status of "regional power" and controlled the region's speech power. Today, Pakistan has played a sense of presence with an air war, and the traditional advantage of India has begun to shake.
On the surface, this India-Pakistan air battle is a 52-minute air contest, but in fact it is a multi-dimensional and multi-front strategic game.
From the battlefield to the venue, from heaven to the ground, Pakistan not only won a real war, but also won a public opinion war and diplomatic war. and the full support of the Chinese side, also let China-Pakistan relations warm up again, from the "iron bar" to the "community of destiny".
India lost on the triple fronts of military, information warfare and diplomacy, and even tried to cover up the actual situation with historical assumptions. Unfortunately, history has no assumptions, and reality has no script.
Worse than losing a battle is losing postwar positions, emotions, and confidence.
Today, the whole world has heard of Pakistan's "7:0", and has also seen a deeper level of synergy between China and Pakistan. and India, is to continue the war with the mouth, or face-to-face adjustment strategy?
Source:
Pakistan Prime Minister in the UN General Assembly called "exploding seven printed fighter jets into debris", India strongly rejected September 27, 2025 23:43 Observer Network
Pakistani Prime Minister: Seven Indian fighter jets bombed into “dust and iron” 2025-09-27 20:03 Long An Street Governor
"During about 80 minutes," Indian media tightened: Trump's closed-door talks with Pakistan's prime minister and army marshal 26 September 2025 14:42