In the last week of September, the air in the Middle East was tight again. Air defense sirens in Israeli cities suddenly sounded, and crowds fled.

It wasn¡¯t a conventional rocket bomb, it was the Houthi armed forces claiming to have used high-speed hypersonic missiles, and the Israeli defense line was torn a mouth.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu quickly responded to the declaration of war, but at the United Nations General Assembly, Indonesian President Subianto suddenly announced that he was "ready to send 20,000 peacekeeping troops to Gaza."

This is not a joke, it is a clear statement of the world¡¯s largest Muslim country.The situation is far beyond the old account between Pakistan and it is attracting a bigger force.

The bottom line of Israeli security is being torn a little.

Over the past few years, Israel has built itself into a ¡°Middle East fortress¡± with a whole set of layer-overlapping air defense systems.

The "Iron Dome" is the best known, and the "Arrow" and "David's bow" air defense network can basically stop most of the rocket bombs flying from around. but this time the Houthi-armed missiles, but like the sharp knives, directly into the soft rib of the Israeli defense line.

This is not an accidental breakthrough. Judging from the situation in recent months, Israel's defense line is becoming increasingly difficult. Armed groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Houthi began to frequently use drones, small rockets and even simple missiles, launching them intensively, and relying on quantity to suppress air defense systems.

Although a single force is small, it is not possible to compete cheaply and in large quantity.The cost of each attack in Israel is astonishingly high, and the result is more and more losses.

And now the problem is not only not to win, but also not to win.Israeli air defense systems, high-tech content, maintenance and ammunition supplies are dependent on external support.

In addition to the modernization of the equipment in the hands of the armed organizations is also fast, before Israel can rely on technology to suppress, now the opponent drones and missiles are becoming more advanced, but the price is much lower, fighting is a fast pace, low cost, high efficiency.

Israel¡¯s previously technologically suppressed method is becoming increasingly difficult.

This puts Israel in a dilemma: it must not only defend against intensive attacks on the front line, but also ensure domestic security and stability, and the pressure on logistics and economy is increasing.

And most importantly, once this defense system is broken, the shock to the outside world is greater than the actual loss. The psychological shock caused by the Houthi attack is far greater than the physical destruction. Can Israel really survive?

Netanyahu is hard at the forefront, but the diplomatic circle is becoming more and more clear.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has always been a hardline, and this time is no exception.

In the face of the missile attack, he did not choose to appease public opinion or seek a diplomatic solution, but directly declared war, but this also attracted many doubts internationally.

Specifically at the UN General Assembly, he directly denied the possibility of a ¡°Palestinian state¡± and said he would not support the two-state plan.

These remarks are clearly contrary to the current position of most countries. Now, even some traditional allies are no longer as firmly on Israel's side as in the past.

Some European countries have repeatedly expressed support for the establishment of a Palestinian state, indicating that Israel¡¯s sense of isolation in international diplomacy is increasing.

Interestingly, during Netanyahu¡¯s visit to the United Nations, he was also blown up to deliberately evade certain countries¡¯ airspace in order to circumvent possible legal risks.

Because some countries are members of the International Criminal Court, once he enters the airspace of those countries, it may involve legal liability issues.

This practice of ¡°flying around¡± is, in fact, fear of being caught, showing that his situation under international law has become very embarrassing.

The military aid bill was delayed, diplomatic coordination loosened, and even in the United Nations voting, Israel was no longer backed by one side, it could be said that Israel is now diplomatically ¡°relying more on itself than on others.¡±

The attitude of the EU is becoming increasingly vague. On the one hand, it is worried about triggering a larger refugee tide; on the other hand, it does not dare to support Israel too obviously for fear of offending Arab countries.

In the context of this uncertainty, Netanyahu¡¯s harsh words seem to be more of a solitary shot, rather than a preparation.

Indonesia's action unveils a new script for power changes in the Middle East

The Indonesian president¡¯s statement that sending 20,000 peacekeepers to Gaza is still at the level ¡°if the UN approves¡± is already heavy enough.

Indonesia is not a country in the Middle East, but it has the largest Muslim population in the world. This sudden voice is obviously not to join in the fun.

A trend can be seen from this incident: more and more non-Middle Eastern countries, especially those with large Muslim populations, are beginning to express clearer positions on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, and are even preparing to actually intervene.

Behind this, it actually reflects a change in the global security pattern: in the Middle East, a few big countries are no longer in charge of the final say, and medium-sized countries and regional forces are beginning to take the initiative.

And Indonesia¡¯s trend is not limited to this statement. Recently it has also been that it is considering purchasing Chinese warplanes and missiles, which indicates that its military cooperation direction is changing.

Countries like Indonesia, which used to rely primarily on Western weapons supplies, are now looking for diversified options, illustrating more reservations about the ¡°US-Europe-Core¡± security order.

This change is not good news for Israel.Because it has always held a weapons technology and intelligence superiority in the past, traditional Israeli means of repression will not necessarily work once more and more countries start to use different systems of equipment in line with different strategic logic.

The deeper impact is the global arms trade pattern is relaxing.The military-industrial capacity of Western countries is tightened, delivery cycles are extended, and countries such as Indonesia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia are beginning to look for cheaper, faster, and more flexible options.

For Israel, this trend of diversification means that the battlefield will become more and more complex, and it will no longer be possible to suppress all opponents with a single set of methods.

Indonesia's "statement of sending troops" this time, on the surface, is to balance the situation, but in fact it may be the beginning of a new round of regional security model.

If more countries really follow suit, then the old issue of Gaza will usher in a new group of participants. For Israel, this is a node where its strategy must be reconsidered.

The old order is loosening, and a new situation is emerging

This sudden attack broke Israel¡¯s illusion of security and also ripped off the surface calm of the Middle East situation.Netanyahu¡¯s declaration of war was a response to reality, but also a test for future uncertainty.

Indonesia's words, on the other hand, are like a new chess piece, quietly changing the layout of the chessboard dominated by big countries in the past.

The Middle East is no longer a simple old scenario, more and more countries are starting to participate, more and more unseen forces are moving in the dark. If Israel still wants to maintain security by the old methods, it will be difficult to cope with this new wave of change.

The real turning point,, is not on the battlefield, but whether you are willing to change the strategy after recognizing the reality.

The key to the future is not how far the missiles hit, but whether the parties are willing to sit down and find ways to give the land a chance to breathe.

The Middle East game is no longer the game of the past.Who can first understand the new rules, who is likely to take the initiative in the next round of the game.

The reference information:

Israeli missile attack ¨C China Energy 2025-09-17 13:25

Israeli Army intercepted a Houthi armed drone failed, at least 15 people were wounded ¡ª interface sms 2025-09-24 23:35