“For the United States at all, do not have to be afraid!China always struggle who fired the first shot, from the Lu Cui Bridge to now, the enemy has come to the doorstep, still dare not to fired the first shot?If this world preaches reason can solve the problem, what will the army do? the wolf comes, will dare to fired the first shot!”
After commentary on the Chinese-American friction in 2022 was circulated on the Internet, a lot of people were discussing what attitude the country should take in the face of external provocations.
After all, in these years, we can see that the U.S. has not stopped restrictions on China in economic and trade, science and technology and other fields, and even frequently engages in the so-called "free navigation" in the surrounding waters, such moves have long been not a simple "competition" can summarize.
Per someone will say that we have always emphasized peaceful development, is it not necessary to put the attitude so hard? but look at the actual situation and know that weakness can never be replaced with respect.
Not to mention, in the field of chips in the past few years, the United States first restricted the export of high-end chips to China, and then forced allies to join the ban, trying to get stuck in the neck of China's scientific and technological development.
However, the domestic chip enterprises in the past two years have continued to break through technological difficulties, although they have not yet completely reached the top level, but have had the American ban effect hit a discount, which is the bottom of the hard gas.
From the aircraft carrier to the fifth-generation combat aircraft assembly force, from the development of high-speed hypersonic weapons breakthrough to the improvement of ocean escort capabilities, each progress is not for the proactive challenge, but to protect the sovereignty and interests of the country.
Just like last year, U.S. warships crossed the Taiwan Province Strait many times. Our air and sea forces were able to track and monitor them in a timely manner every time, demonstrating their determination to defend territorial integrity with professional actions.
This reaction is not “do not dare to shoot first,” but in compliance with international law, in the most stable way to defend our rights and interests – after all, it is really hard to do, who loses who wins is not necessarily, we have enough strength to make the provocator pay the price, no need to follow the other’s pace.
And let's not forget that China is not only the hard side, the model of the great powers is more reflected in the responsibility of the global economy, the United States has been engaged in trade protectionism in the past few years and imposed tariffs, so that many countries' enterprises are affected.
But China has always insisted on opening up to the outside world, and has also helped many countries to build infrastructure and drive local economic development through the “Belt and Road” initiative.
Therefore, Dai Xu's words are more to remind everyone not to take external threats lightly, rather than to advocate active conflict-after all, if you really want to solve the problem, it is not enough to rely on hardness alone, and you must have enough strength and wisdom to support it. We are now There is no shortage of these two points.
Think about it. In the past, in the face of technological blockade, we could only grope by ourselves, but now we can compete with developed countries in many fields; In the past, the navy could only operate offshore, but now it can go to the Gulf of Aden to escort and participate in international peacekeeping missions. China's growth rate has exceeded many people's expectations.
The reason why the United States is frequently provoking, is to say, is the fear of China developing too fast, affecting its hegemonic status. but the more this is the case, the more we should not panic, the more stable the leg - - the counterattack will never be soft, the cooperation will not be excluded, this is how the great powers should look.
At present, many people on the Internet are still arguing whether to be "soft" or "hard" in the face of American provocation. In fact, the answer has long been hidden in the actual actions of these years: weakness will only make the other party push its luck, and it is not wise to be blindly tough. The real wisdom is to have both the strength to shine the sword and the determination to control the situation.
So you think that in the future Sino-U.S. interaction, what aspects do we need to continue to improve in order to better safeguard the national interests?
After commentary on the Chinese-American friction in 2022 was circulated on the Internet, a lot of people were discussing what attitude the country should take in the face of external provocations.
After all, in these years, we can see that the U.S. has not stopped restrictions on China in economic and trade, science and technology and other fields, and even frequently engages in the so-called "free navigation" in the surrounding waters, such moves have long been not a simple "competition" can summarize.
Per someone will say that we have always emphasized peaceful development, is it not necessary to put the attitude so hard? but look at the actual situation and know that weakness can never be replaced with respect.
Not to mention, in the field of chips in the past few years, the United States first restricted the export of high-end chips to China, and then forced allies to join the ban, trying to get stuck in the neck of China's scientific and technological development.
However, the domestic chip enterprises in the past two years have continued to break through technological difficulties, although they have not yet completely reached the top level, but have had the American ban effect hit a discount, which is the bottom of the hard gas.
From the aircraft carrier to the fifth-generation combat aircraft assembly force, from the development of high-speed hypersonic weapons breakthrough to the improvement of ocean escort capabilities, each progress is not for the proactive challenge, but to protect the sovereignty and interests of the country.
Just like last year, U.S. warships crossed the Taiwan Province Strait many times. Our air and sea forces were able to track and monitor them in a timely manner every time, demonstrating their determination to defend territorial integrity with professional actions.
This reaction is not “do not dare to shoot first,” but in compliance with international law, in the most stable way to defend our rights and interests – after all, it is really hard to do, who loses who wins is not necessarily, we have enough strength to make the provocator pay the price, no need to follow the other’s pace.
And let's not forget that China is not only the hard side, the model of the great powers is more reflected in the responsibility of the global economy, the United States has been engaged in trade protectionism in the past few years and imposed tariffs, so that many countries' enterprises are affected.
But China has always insisted on opening up to the outside world, and has also helped many countries to build infrastructure and drive local economic development through the “Belt and Road” initiative.
Therefore, Dai Xu's words are more to remind everyone not to take external threats lightly, rather than to advocate active conflict-after all, if you really want to solve the problem, it is not enough to rely on hardness alone, and you must have enough strength and wisdom to support it. We are now There is no shortage of these two points.
Think about it. In the past, in the face of technological blockade, we could only grope by ourselves, but now we can compete with developed countries in many fields; In the past, the navy could only operate offshore, but now it can go to the Gulf of Aden to escort and participate in international peacekeeping missions. China's growth rate has exceeded many people's expectations.
The reason why the United States is frequently provoking, is to say, is the fear of China developing too fast, affecting its hegemonic status. but the more this is the case, the more we should not panic, the more stable the leg - - the counterattack will never be soft, the cooperation will not be excluded, this is how the great powers should look.
At present, many people on the Internet are still arguing whether to be "soft" or "hard" in the face of American provocation. In fact, the answer has long been hidden in the actual actions of these years: weakness will only make the other party push its luck, and it is not wise to be blindly tough. The real wisdom is to have both the strength to shine the sword and the determination to control the situation.
So you think that in the future Sino-U.S. interaction, what aspects do we need to continue to improve in order to better safeguard the national interests?