[Zhang Hao, Huang Peizhao, Global Times Special Correspondent in Israel and Egypt, Global Times reporter Li Meng] Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu encountered many protests when speaking at the general debate of the United Nations General Assembly on the 26th, and representatives from many countries attending the meeting stood up and left the table. At this session of the UN General Assembly, a new round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which has been delayed for nearly two years, has become one of the focuses. Many countries have announced their recognition of the Palestinian state and expressed their solidarity with the people of Gaza who have suffered from "purgatory on earth". The Associated Press described Israel's diplomatic situation as "global isolation". According to Reuters, in his speech on the 26th, Netanyahu lashed out at France, Britain, Australia, Canada and other Western countries for supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state, accusing these countries of sending the wrong message that "murdering Jews pays off." On the same day, US President Trump said that an agreement to end the Gaza conflict and promote the release of detainees was about to be reached, and he would meet with Netanyahu on the 29th. According to CNN analysis, Netanyahu rejected the two-state solution in "the harshest words so far" after he at least "symbolically acknowledged the distant possibility" of the plan. According to Reuters, Netanyahu's attack on major U.S. allies has deepened Israel's international isolation due to a new round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and his meeting with Trump may be "tense".

¡°He spoke almost to an empty room.¡±

On the 26th, local time, the general debate of the UN General Assembly in New York entered its fourth day. When Netanyahu stood up at the speech table, numerous delegates from the UN member states who had just settled up stood up and protested in different directions, and several people left in front of Netanyahu. The Israeli delegation and the friends invited by Netanyahu stood up and applauded, believed to be trying to shift the line of sight. According to the Israeli Times, the withdrawal of representatives from Arab countries, Islamic countries, African countries and some European countries highlighted Israel¡¯s ¡°unprecedented diplomatic trouble.¡±

According to the New York Times, Netanyahu was the first speaker of the day, and he almost spoke to the empty hall, "this picture seems to be a metaphor of Israeli diplomatic isolation, highlighting some Israeli concerns about the country's "international abandoned" status."The Associated Press said that only U.S. and British low-level diplomats were seated in the seats, and the Iranian delegation's empty seat also laid a group of dead Gaza children.

The Associated Press stated that despite facing "global isolation", Netanyahu delivered a tough speech of about 40 minutes that day, saying that Israel will continue to "hunt down its enemies", breaking down the country's "attacks" in regional conflicts in the past two years. enemies ", emphasizing that Israel is fighting Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthi armed forces in Yemen and Iran" for the United States and European countries ". Qatar Al Jazeera mentioned that members of the US delegation applauded many times during Netanyahu's speech.

Netanyahu, who was wearing a two-dimensional code on his coat of clothes on the same day, could see ¡°Hamas-related videos of atrocities¡±. He noted that the Israeli army had deployed a large number of speakers in the Gaza Strip, broadcasting his speeches in real time. In his speech, he shouted directly to the detainees and Hamas, demanding the release of Israel¡¯s remaining detainees. In addition, Netanyahu defended Israel¡¯s military operations in the Gaza Strip and in many countries in the Middle East, calling it ¡°a shameful decision¡± to oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state, not only by himself and the ruling coalition he led, but also by Israel¡¯s ¡°state policy¡±.

Hamas said in a statement on Monday that Netanyahu¡¯s ¡°misleading¡± remarks contained a series of ¡°open lies and contradictions¡±, with multi-national delegates withdrawing from the protest showing Israel¡¯s ¡°isolation situation¡±. Opposition party leader, former prime minister Rapid, wrote on social media that Netanyahu¡¯s remarks at the UN ¡°filled with mourning¡± ¡°filled with boring heads,¡± not only made clear plans for the release of detainees and the end of the war, but also made Israel¡¯s situation worse.

Eide, a political scientist and former communications director of the Palestine Liberation Organization, told Al Jazeera that Netanyahu's speech is unlikely to influence the global public's perception of his "genocidal war in Gaza" and reiterated the fact that the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu. According to a number of media reports, Netanyahu's special plane to the United States changed its regular route for the first time in order to avoid passing through the airspace of some European countries, bypassing about 600 kilometers. Some analysts believe that this move may be to circumvent the arrest warrant of the International Criminal Court.

Witkov: Trump has proposed a ¡°peace plan¡±

CNN that Netanyahu¡¯s stance in the UN General Assembly speech was in sharp contrast to the Trump administration¡¯s stance in hoping for a ¡°peace plan.¡± Trumply said on 26 that he was preparing to meet Netanyahu on 29 and that an agreement was about to be reached to end the conflict in Gaza and facilitate the release of detainees. The day before, Trump made it clear that he refused to allow Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. The U.S. Wall Street Journal that Trump¡¯s remarks marked a rare public pressure on Netanyahu.

According to U.S. Special Envoy for the Middle East Witkov, Trump has submitted a ¡°peace plan¡± with 21 key points to several leaders, which includes a ban on the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, the gradual withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, the release of all Israeli detainees, the establishment of a temporary dual-layer governance structure comprised of the international supervisory agency and the Palestinian Commission, the provision of a reliable route for the establishment of a Palestinian state, the exclusion of Hamas from the control of Gaza, and Israel¡¯s pledge to no longer attack Qatar.

According to the Israel Public Broadcasting Corporation, Netanyahu was told when he met with Witkov and Trump's son-in-law kushner in new york on the 25th that "the president thinks it is time to fight for an end to the war". According to the report, the meeting was to reach a broad consensus on related issues before the formal meeting between Netanyahu and Trump on the 29th. Israeli media believe that some conditions in Trump's "peace plan" may be unacceptable to Hamas, and the plan is also contrary to Netanyahu's long-standing red line that "there will be no Palestinian state". However, according to the poll data released by Israel's Evening Prayer on the 26th, 53% of the Israeli people support Trump's "21-point peace plan".

Is it a real breakthrough or a temporary "diplomatic phantom"?

Al Jazeera said on the 26th that although 157 of the 193 member states of the United Nations have recognized the Palestinian state, including even traditional allies of Israel and the United States, the status quo of Palestine is difficult to change in the short term. Turkey's Anadolu News Agency commented that the recognition of the Palestinian state by many Western countries is unlikely to have immediate tangible effects. On the contrary, it may also exacerbate internal divisions between Israel and Palestine, thereby exacerbating the instability of the situation. What the Palestinian people really need is internal unity, definite borders and sustainable governance. "Ultimately, the recognition of a Palestinian state is more like sending a signal of political resistance to Washington."

¡°Is Trump¡¯s ¡®peace plan¡¯ really a real policy shift or another temporary diplomatic illusion?¡± The Guardian that Trump¡¯s ¡®peace plan¡¯ was largely based on the post-war plan developed by former British Prime Minister Blair and Trump¡¯s son-in-law Kushner. One of them was that Blair himself would serve as head of the ¡®Gaza International Transition Authority¡¯, seeking UN authorization to serve as the ¡®highest political and legal authority¡¯ in the Gaza Strip for five years, and eventually transfer power to the Palestinian national authorities.

Although US media claimed that the "peace plan" was welcomed by Arab countries, many Arab-speaking media mentioned that Arab countries have always emphasized the Palestinian nature of Gaza and opposed external forces dominating Gaza affairs. Lebanon's "Messenger" stated that this plan of the United States is humane on the surface, but in fact it hides capital and political calculations. It is a manifestation of big countries getting their hands on Palestine and playing games in the Middle East, and is not aimed at helping the suffering people of Gaza.