On February 8, 2019 (January 4, 2019 in the lunar calendar), Zhai Tianlin incident. During the Spring Festival in 2019, the Zhai Tianlin incident attracted everyone's attention. This incident was mainly because Zhai Tianlin frequently posted his doctoral degree and the progress of various doctoral thesis on the Internet at first, but sharp-eyed netizens discovered the problem from the beginning. The opening time of Zhai Tianlin's doctoral thesis and the defense were all wrong. The final trigger was Zhai Tianlin's saying on the live broadcast platform that he did not know about the Internet. On February 8, 2019, Zhai Tianlin was questioned because he didn't know what Internet was when answering questions from netizens during the live broadcast, and the authenticity of his doctorate was questioned. Later, his person left a message on Weibo saying "Just kidding." Young actor Zhai Tianlin reported to the Peking University Postdoctoral Research Mobile Station on January 10, 2019, and quit on February 16, which lasted only more than 30 days. If he does not encounter "academic counterfeiting", he plans to participate in the two-year research project "Research on the Cultural Industry Value Chain" here. At noon on February 16, Sina Weibo @ Peking University released the "Investigation Notes on Recruiting Zhai Tianlin as a Postdoctoral Doctor" stating that the investigation team confirmed that Zhai Tianlin had academic misconduct after investigation, and the school agreed to Guanghua School of Management to withdraw Zhai Tianlin on February 13. Opinion on withdrawing from the station (Peking University Postdoctoral Research Mobile Station). In addition, the school decided to stop recruiting postdoctoral students for Zhai Tianlin's co-tutors. The "Investigation Notes on Recruiting Zhai Tianlin as a Postdoctoral Doctor" pointed out that after investigation, it was found that during the review, interview and recruitment process of Zhai Tianlin's entry materials, the cooperation instructors, interview teams and Guanghua School of Management had lax academic controls and insufficient substantive reviews. problem. Zhai Tianlin's academic counterfeiting "I don't know what 'know net', and his published papers are suspected of plagiarism. Zhai Tianlin, a popular star who has just played an anti-counterfeiting actor on the stage of the Spring Festival Gala, is facing the roar of academic counterfeiting in real life. Zhai Tianlin's 'character design' is rapidly collapsing." Previously, an article in Science and Technology Daily concluded. The fermentation of the matter began with a question and answer posted by the Weibo account @PITD Asian Doctor Abuse Organization on the third day of the Lunar New Year: Why did Dr. Zhai Tianlin graduate but had no publicly published paper? This set the first blow to academic counterfeiting in 2019. An article in the WeChat official account "Science and Technology Daily" pointed out that most of the people who follow this account are master's and doctoral students who have struggled or struggled in the sea of paper and know the pain of baldness in their papers. Zhai Tianlin's talent personality in the entertainment industry has long attracted their attention. According to the paper's news articles, doubts about Zhai Tianlin are mainly manifested in two aspects. First, one of Zhai Tianlin's two papers that could be publicly retrieved was suspected of plagiarism. This paper, entitled "Talking about the Performance and Creation of Bai Xiaowen" in TV Series ", has only more than 2800 words in full, and the content of 1646 words is the same as that published by others. This article was condemned by the plagiarist, Professor Huang Lihua of Huangshan University."I was copied by the entire paragraph of the paper I published more than ten years ago. Facts speak louder than words." Second, after Zhai Tianlin posted his postdoctoral admission notice at Peking University Guanghua School of Management on the Internet in a high-profile manner, in addition to the above-mentioned suspected plagiarism papers, netizens could not find other journal papers published by Zhai Tianlin. According to the relevant requirements of the Beijing Film Academy, Zhai Tianlin will not be able to obtain a doctoral degree if he has not published at least two academic papers in academic journals during his doctoral studies. Moreover, the article "Talking about the Performance and Creation of" Bai Xiaowen "in TV Series" was removed from HowNet on February 10. The reporter noticed that with the arrival of the first working day after the Spring Festival holiday on February 11, more and more media have begun to intervene in this topic, including the People's Daily's Weixin Official Accounts. Many authoritative media either published articles or reproduced discussions. On the evening of February 10, the "Science and Technology Daily" Weixin Official Accounts published an article "Zhai Tianlin was subject to an" academic fraud "and Peking University was also required to come out to" take two steps ", pointing out that" every paper that does not abide by academic norms, every behavior that does not abide by scientific research integrity, may be detonated at some point... A doctoral title is not a light honorary title... Whether it is an individual or a scientific research institution, only by having more reverence for academics and rules can we walk more steadily." The above-mentioned article on the Weixin Official Accounts of "Science and Technology Daily" was reprinted on the Weixin Official Accounts of "People's Daily" on the evening of the 11th with the title "[Focus] Zhai Tianlin, a Dr. of Beijing Film Academy, Suffered by Academic Counterfeiting." On the 11th, Henan media Dahe.com also joined the discussion, publishing an article "Zhai Tianlin's Thesis Storm is More Important than" Academic Integrity ", pointing out that" a doctoral degree is a serious evaluation system that represents academic level and stands on the same starting line, it has nothing to do with star status. This incident naturally attracted attention because of its celebrity status, but since it involves suspected academic misconduct, it transcends the scope of the entertainment industry and requires investigation by the education department." Jiangsu media "Yangtze Evening News" also published articles to participate in the discussion. The newspaper accused Zhai Tianlin of plagiarizing his paper and his "Doctor" personality collapsed? "Three questions are asked Zhai Tianlin, who has the" academic personality ": Who writes the thesis? How to get a degree? How to pass the trial?@ The People's Daily also published a short commentary on February 11: As an actor, as long as the performance is online, the academic level is not the key; but as a student, whether he is a celebrity or not, academic norms must be fair. If you have real talent and knowledge, you are not afraid of squeezing out water, and if you practice fraud, you will definitely not stand up to scrutiny. The doctoral hat is the highest honor on campus, but it is destined to become more and more difficult to "mix". If you want to wear a crown, you must shoulder its weight. After the Ministry of Education paid attention to the fermentation of public opinion, the units involved expressed their opinions one by one. Among them,"Talking about the Performance and Creation of" Bai Xiaowen "in TV Series" was a paper published by Zhai Tianlin as a doctoral student at the Beijing Film Academy while reading. On February 11, a reporter from the Beijing Youth Daily learned from the Beijing Film Academy that the school attached great importance to this incident., an investigation team has been established and the investigation procedures have been initiated in accordance with relevant procedures. The school stated that it attaches great importance to the construction of academic ethics and has a zero-tolerance attitude towards academic misconduct. Also on February 11,@ Peking University published a response from Peking University's Guanghua School of Management saying: "Our hospital attaches great importance to the recent media and public attention to the incident of Zhai Tianlin's involvement in academic misconduct." We will handle it in accordance with regulations based on the investigation conclusions of the doctoral degree-awarding unit. Three days later, on February 14,@ Beijing Film Academy released a description of the investigation into Zhai Tianlin's problem (1): The academic committee of the school hired experts inside and outside the school to conduct a collection and preliminary review of relevant materials, and has now entered a formal investigation stage and notified Zhai Tianlin himself. A moment later,@ Zhai Tianlin published a "Letter of Apology", expressing his willingness to actively cooperate with the Beijing Film Academy's "all investigations" and saying that he formally applied to withdraw from the relevant work of the Peking University Postdoctoral Research Mobile Station. In the afternoon of the same day,@ Guanghua School of Management at Peking University spoke again: Noting that Zhai Tianlin publicly expressed his willingness to withdraw from the postdoctoral research station today, the college has always maintained a zero-tolerance attitude towards academic misconduct and will deal with it in accordance with laws and procedures. The Paper News noted that on December 14, 2018, the Postdoctoral Office of Peking University released the "Announcement of Peking University's Postdoctoral List of Proposed Postdoctoral Students in January 2019" through the official website. The date of the announcement is from December 14, 2018 to December 2018. Zhai Tianlin was among them. According to the follow-up notification, he finally passed the announcement. Zhai Tianlin's case has also attracted the attention of the Ministry of Education. On February 15, in response to the paper's question about Zhai Tianlin's alleged academic misconduct, Xu Mei, spokesperson of the Ministry of Education, said,"Recently, Zhai Tianlin's related public opinion has caused heated discussions on the Internet. The Ministry of Education attaches great importance to this matter and also required relevant parties to conduct rapid verification as soon as possible. She pointed out that relevant authorities in Beijing City are also urging and guiding the Beijing Film Academy to organize an investigation, and Peking University has also carried out relevant verification work."The investigation not only involves whether (Zhai Tianlin) himself is suspected of academic misconduct, but also involves whether there are problems in other aspects of the work. We also saw Nortel and Peking University issued phased verification statements yesterday (February 14), and Zhai Tianlin himself also issued a public letter of apology to the public. Xu Mei emphasized that the Ministry of Education has always had a clear attitude towards academic misconduct, and it must not be allowed to ignore academic rules, undermine academic norms, and undermine educational fairness. Accompanied by the statements of all parties, there are also endless commentary articles, such as People's Daily Online's "Doctoral Counterfeiting Offenders, Returning Academics to Pure". Peking University concluded that how did Zhai Tianlin enter the postdoctoral research mobile station of Guanghua School of Management at Peking University? On February 16,@ Peking University published an explanation in the "Investigation Notes on Recruiting Zhai Tianlin as a Postdoctoral Doctor". The "Investigation Notes on Recruiting Zhai Tianlin as a Postdoctoral Doctor" stated that on November 6, 2018, the Guanghua School of Management of Peking University published the "2019 Postdoctoral Recruitment Notice" on the college website. Based on the above recruitment information, Zhai Tianlin submitted a postdoctoral application to the college, and submitted the application materials as required (including personal resume, list of academic achievements, two representative works, postdoctoral research ideas and work plans, etc.). On November 27, Guanghua School of Management entrusted co-tutors, professors in this subject field and postdoctoral work leaders to form an interview team in accordance with the "Implementation Rules for Postdoctoral Recruitment, Entry and Exit Management of Peking University" and the "Postdoctoral Management Measures of Guanghua School of Management". The research plan for "Economic Research in the Film Industry" submitted by Zhai Tianlin is consistent with the research needs of the co-tutors. Based on this and the interview performance, the co-tutors and the interview team comprehensively considered the perspective of cross-disciplinary research and agreed to hire Zhai Tianlin as a co-researcher to enter Guanghua School of Management Postdoctoral Research Station to participate in the two-year research project of "Research on the Cultural Industry Value Chain". After being publicized and filed by the school, Zhai Tianlin reported for station on January 10, 2019. The "Investigation Notes on Recruiting Zhai Tianlin as a Postdoctoral Doctor" now points out that after investigation, it was found that during the review, interview and recruitment process of Zhai Tianlin's entry materials, the cooperation instructors, interview teams and Guanghua School of Management had lax academic controls and insufficient substantive reviews. The problem was also confirmed that Zhai Tianlin had academic misconduct. According to the Regulations on Postdoctoral Management by the Ministry of Personnel and the National Postdoctoral Management Committee (Chinese People's Ministry Fa [2006] No. 149) Article 33 and the Ministry of Human Resources and social protection, The National Postdoctoral Management Committee's "Notice on Issues Related to Implementing the Opinions of the General Office of the State Council on Reforming and Improving the Postdoctoral System"(Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Fa [2017] No. 20) on the requirements for strict recruitment and management of postdoctoral personnel and the "Peking University Postdoctoral Research Personnel Management Measures (Trial)"(Xiaofa [2013] No. 10) Article 27, the school agreed with Guanghua School of Management's opinion on Zhai Tianlin's withdrawal from the station on February 13. In accordance with Article 29 of the "Peking University Postdoctoral Researchers Management Measures (Trial)", the school decided to stop recruiting postdoctoral students for the co-tutor, severely criticized the members of the interview team, and instructed Guanghua School of Management to conduct an in-depth inspection. Peking University said that the school will further improve relevant systems and management measures, and requires the Postdoctoral Management Office to organize each postdoctoral recruitment unit to seriously carry out self-examination and self-correction, further tighten academic standards and strengthen normative awareness. Those who are fraudulent or violate academic ethics in postdoctoral application materials, as well as those who are not strictly reviewed during the recruitment process, will be held accountable and will be investigated and punished each time they are discovered, and will not be tolerated. This problem exposes loopholes in the school's postdoctoral management. We reflect deeply on this, draw lessons from one example, further strengthen and improve the school's internal management, check for leaks and fill in gaps, consolidate responsibilities, conscientiously rectify, and humbly accept supervision and criticism from the public.