On April 29, 2003 (March 28, 2003), Cong Fukui, the former executive vice governor of Hebei Province, was given a suspended death sentence for accepting bribes. On April 29, 2003, the Zhangjiakou City Intermediate People's Court of Hebei Province, in accordance with the decision of the Higher People's Court of Hebei Province to designate jurisdiction, made a first-instance judgment on the bribery case of Cong Fukui, the former executive vice governor of Hebei Province, and sentenced Cong Fukui to death for the crime of accepting bribes. The execution was suspended for 2 years, the political rights were deprived for life, and all personal property was confiscated. The court found that from July 1997 to June 2000, while serving as a member of the Standing Committee of the Hebei Provincial Party Committee and the executive vice governor of the Hebei Provincial People's Government, Cong Fukui took advantage of his position to apply for a loan extension from Hong Kong Shengkang International Co., Ltd. to Hebei International Trust and Investment Company, Hong Kong Shengkang International Co., Ltd. to transfer the company's shares in Shengcang Development Co., Ltd., Hebei Yutong Industrial Co., Ltd. to China Construction Bank Hebei Branch, Qinhuangdao City Qinlong International Industrial Co., Ltd. and Qinhuangdao City Seaside Forest Farm Contract Fee Dispute, China Heilongjiang International Economic and Technical Cooperation Corporation applied for a letter of guarantee for equipment advance payment to Agricultural Bank of China Hebei Branch, Shenzhen Beishitong Investment Co., Ltd. in Hebei to promote automobile exhaust purification devices and other matters, for Cong Zhen, Li Yunliang, Li Xiaoming, Wang Xiaoguang and others to seek benefits The request and illegal receipt of the above four people's money amounted to more than 9.36 million yuan. The Zhangjiakou City Intermediate People's Court held that Cong Fukui, as a government official, took advantage of his position, accepted the request of others, sought benefits for others, demanded and illegally accepted other people's property, and his behavior constituted the crime of accepting bribes. Due to the huge amount of bribes, the circumstances were particularly serious, and the crime should be sentenced to death. However, in view of the fact that after he was brought to justice, he had a good attitude of pleading guilty and could take the initiative to confess some of the criminal facts, and the stolen money involved in the case had been fully recovered and other circumstances of the case, he was sentenced to death and could not be executed immediately. Therefore, the above judgment was made according