69 years ago today, August 31, 1956 (July 26, 1956, the first female leader of Taiwan, Tsai Ing-wen, was born. Tsai Ing-wen Tsai Ing-wen (born August 31, 1956), female, a Hong Kong resident in Fengshan Township, Pingtung County, China Taiwan Province, and a Hakka of the Han nationality. Taiwanese scholar and politician, currently chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party. Tsai Ing-wen graduated from the Department of Law of Taiwan University in 1978. She served as chairmen of the 12th and 13th Democratic Progressive Party, vice president of the "Executive Yuan", chairman of the "Mainland Affairs Council","legislator", adviser to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, and professor of Chengchi University. On January 16, 2016, the leaders of the Taiwan region voted, and Tsai Ing-wen and Chen Jianren won the election. Tsai Ing-wen is the first female party chairman of a major political party in Taiwan and the first female leader of the Taiwan region. Tsai Ing-wen, who has a new political experience, has a master's degree from Cornell University in the United States and a doctorate from the London School of Economics in the United Kingdom. In the 1990s, she participated in the drafting of the "Two-State Theory" and was deeply appreciated by Lee Teng-hui, the then "Chinese Taipei leader". At the beginning of 2008, the Democratic Progressive Party violated its pre-election promise during its eight years in power. The Democratic Progressive Party was corrupt and incompetent during its eight years in power, causing dissatisfaction among the Taiwanese people. At this time, Li Yuanzhe, former president of Taiwan's "Academia Sinica" who was "enthusiastic" about politics, approached Tsai Ing-wen and urged her to come forward and lead the Democratic Progressive Party. Encouraging violence In May 2008, Tsai Ing-wen was elected as chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, becoming the first female party chairman in the history of the Democratic Progressive Party. The "Taiwan independence" forces and their supporters are the foundation of the DPP. If we want to control the DPP, we must obtain their recognition and support. In order to keep her position, Tsai Ing-wen played the "Taiwan independence" card. In order to compete with Chen Shui-bian for the status of "Taiwan independence", Tsai Ing-wen decided to use the opportunity of Chen Yunlin, President of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait, to visit Taiwan for the first time from November 5 to 6, 2008 to create violent conflicts. Prior to this, Tsai Ing-wen made careful planning and vowed to deceive the Taiwanese people to ensure that no violent conflict would occur. On the evening of November 5, the Democratic Progressive Party and its supporters surrounded the Jinghua Hotel where Kuomintang Chairman Wu Po-hsiung hosted a banquet for Chen Yunlin. They made a noise, attacking police with stones and eggs and chasing reporters. On November 6, Tsai Ing-wen continued her "siege" activities. Her supporters threw stones, mineral water bottles, ink bottles, and iron bars at the police in front of Zhongshan South Road, Jingfu Gate, Art Museum, and Yuanshan Hotel in Taipei City. In this violence, police officers from the public power department alone seriously injured 142 people, and more than 20 journalists and more than 100 people were injured. As one of the main culprits of violence, Tsai Ing-wen constantly incited the public, instigated violence, and instigated mob violence in advance, with the intention of obstructing and undermining people-to-people exchanges on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. What is particularly bad is that Tsai Ing-wen deceived the head of Taiwan's internal affairs department beforehand, signed a letter of agreement to ensure that no violence would occur, and falsely claimed to be "legally responsible for everything." However, after the violence broke out, Tsai Ing-wen downplayed all the violence as "sporadic incidents" and immediately shifted the responsibility to the so-called "gangsters." This incident earned Tsai Ing-wen the title of "Violent Xiaoying" on the island and initially consolidated Tsai Ing-wen's position within the Democratic Progressive Party. When Tsai Ing-wen took over as chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, it was the moment when the Democratic Progressive Party was dragged to the bottom by Chen Shui-bian's corruption involvement; Tsai Ing-wen adopted the strategy of "supporting Bian while fighting corruption" to achieve a bleeding effect. She won the election in several subsequent election campaigns and gradually led the DPP to "stand up from the ruins." However, although Tsai Ing-wen tried her best to cut off on Chen Shui-bian's corruption, she still hired a large number of people from Chen Shui-bian's administration. Qiu Yiren, Wu Nairen and others in the campaign team were unable to escape Chen Shui-bian's shadow. What is even more fatal is that Cai's words are always flashing about whether to "pardon" Chen Shui-bian, which makes people inexplicable. Because of this attitude of evading questions, Chen Shui-bian's shadow has always become a lingering nightmare in her bid for leadership. Defining "Taiwan independence" For a long time, in addition to senior "Taiwan independence" politicians such as Chen Shui-bian and Lee Teng-hui, the mainland has been relatively flexible in positioning other green camp people. As a relatively rational figure in the Democratic Progressive Party, Tsai Ing-wen was once placed on high hopes by the mainland to change the color of the Democratic Progressive Party. However, at the end of 2009, Beijing gave up continuing observation of Tsai Ing-wen and characterized her as a "Taiwan independence" element. In 2009, Tsai Ing-wen planned to travel eastward to Fusang from December 13 to 16, trying to repair the Japanese resources inherited by Chonghe and Lee Teng-hui, and deepen her feelings with Japanese right-wing politicians who support the DPP's Taiwan independence stance. Tsai Ing-wen's move aroused strong opposition from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. In response to a reporter's question from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, Jiang Yu said: "China has always and resolutely opposed the activities of 'Taiwan independence' elements like Tsai Ing-wen in countries that have established diplomatic relations with China." People comment that the Democratic Progressive Party is about to conduct intra-party nominations for the 2016 "general election" in Taiwan. Lai Qingde, mayor of Tainan, whose strength cannot be underestimated, officially stated that he will not participate in the intra-party primary election. Taiwan's "United Daily News" commented on the 10th that if there were no surprises, Tsai Ing-wen would stand alone and be nominated by the Democratic Progressive Party. Analysts said that Tsai Ing-wen is facing new challenges. The results of last year's "Nine in One" election have transformed Taiwan's political ecology. However, there are still several variables in Tsai Ing-wen's future path. Tsai Ing-wen's rational exposition, international perspective, political and administrative experience are completely different from those of past DPP politicians, with advantages and disadvantages. There is no burden, a fresh image, lack of practical experience and grassroots strength, and we must compromise with the factions within the party. Including mainland policy, U.S. policy, energy policy, etc., cannot escape the basic framework of the DPP. The article stated that there is a lack of leadership appeal and enthusiasm, insufficient appeal to the masses and insufficient centripetal force from surrounding people, and the staff team and shadow "government" need to be enriched. Objectively facing cross-Strait interactions and the international environment, proposing specific and feasible cross-Strait policies should not be flashy or empty or deliberately avoiding core issues. Taiwan's special external environment and cross-strait relations have countless political, economic and social issues on the island. The current ruling Kuomintang authorities still have their responsibility to shoulder. The people's expectations and demands for Taiwan's leaders and their ruling team next year will inevitably rise. Big things are no longer invisible that can be eliminated by the change of political parties in power. It is indispensable for the whole people to make intelligent and rational decisions and for people of insight to participate in the grand event.