On July 7, 2017 (June 14, 2017 in the lunar calendar), the United Nations adopted the nuclear ban treaty and the five nuclear powers were collectively absent. On July 7, 2017, the United Nations adopted a treaty banning nuclear weapons on a global scale with 122 votes in favor, 1 against, and 1 abstention. In this vote, all nuclear powers including China, Britain, and the United States were absent from the five permanent members of the Security Council. The U.S. representative to the United Nations bluntly said that the treaty was unrealistic and therefore led more than 20 countries to boycott negotiations. This is simply a farce-a group of non-nuclear countries want to make it illegal to possess nuclear weapons, and then hope that the nuclear countries will abolish their own martial arts and let the tiger pull its own claws and teeth. It's really tooyountoosimple ~ Will the world become better without nuclear weapons? Not necessarily. Before the advent of nuclear weapons, two world wars of unprecedented scale broke out on earth; after the birth of nuclear weapons, the terrorist deterrence of tens of thousands of nuclear warheads around the world prevented the Third World War. Don't just see that the two atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed hundreds of thousands of people. Without these two atomic bombs, World War II would have dragged on longer and fought more brutally: the Japanese people would have been greeted by Japanese militarism's "One Hundred Million Jade Shades" plan; if the U.S. military landed in Japan, it would have cost the lives of millions of soldiers. The two atomic bombs saved the lives of more than 100 million people. They can be said to "show the heart of a Bodhisattva by means of thunder." Nuclear deterrence prevents major powers from launching all-out wars. This is the greatest contribution of nuclear weapons to world peace. Non-nuclear countries should still improve their own knowledge level and not think that there is any supreme justice in this world, let alone use the rules and regulations of the United Nations to criticize other countries. Small countries should read this joke carefully: If there is a contradiction between small countries, the United Nations mediates, the contradiction disappears; if there is a contradiction between small countries and big countries, the United Nations mediates, the small country disappears; if there is a contradiction between big countries, the United Nations mediates, the United Nations disappears... Small countries may not accept this, but why should only allow the five permanent members to legally possess nuclear weapons? Very simply, these five countries were the first to build nuclear weapons, and then created a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which explicitly prohibited other countries from possessing nuclear weapons. This is a rogue treaty, isn't it? Hehe, the agreement signed by five big hooligans, how fair do you expect it to be? Naive! Only children talk about good and bad, adults only talk about interests. The weak of the weak is the eternal law of this world. Fairness and respect are won with fists. As early as the beginning of this year, China stated that it would not participate in this negotiation, and explained that this decision was based on the consideration of safeguarding the existing international arms control and disarmament mechanisms and adhering to the principle of step-by-step advancement of nuclear disarmament, which reflects China's commitment to maintaining global strategic balance and stability. Responsible attitude.