On July 8, 2014 (June 12, 2014 in the lunar calendar), Tan Li, former member of the Standing Committee of the Hainan Provincial Party Committee and Executive Vice Governor, was investigated. On July 8, 2014, Tan Li, former member of the Standing Committee of the Hainan Provincial Party Committee and executive vice governor, was investigated on suspicion of serious violations of discipline. In September 2014, the Supreme People's Procuratorate opened an investigation against him on suspicion of accepting bribes. On October 13, 2016, the Intermediate People's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, publicly sentenced Tan Li, former member of the Standing Committee of Hainan Provincial Party Committee and former vice governor of Hainan Provincial Government, to life imprisonment, deprivation of political rights for life and confiscation of all personal property for bribery. The property obtained by Tan Li's bribery was recovered and turned over to the state treasury. After trial, it was found that: From 2001 to 2014, the defendant Tan Li successively took advantage of his positions as member of the Standing Committee of the Chengdu Municipal Party Committee and Minister of the Propaganda Department, Secretary of the Guang 'an Municipal Party Committee, Secretary of the Mianyang Municipal Party Committee, Member of the Standing Committee of the Hainan Provincial Party Committee and Minister of the Propaganda Department, Vice Governor of the People's Government of Hainan Province, and Secretary of the Working Committee of the Hainan International Tourism Island Pilot Zone to seek benefits for others in matters such as enterprise development, project construction, and enforcement of arbitration awards, and illegally accept other people's property directly or through his specific related parties. The total is equivalent to RMB 86.254056 million. The Guangzhou City Intermediate People's Court held that the defendant Tan Li's behavior constituted the crime of accepting bribes. In view of the fact that after Tan Li arrived at the case, he truthfully confessed his crime and took the initiative to confess most of the facts of the crime of bribery that the case-handling authority did not yet know; he pleaded guilty and repented his crime, and actively returned the stolen goods. He had statutory and discretionary circumstances of lighter punishment, and could be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law. The court made the above judgment.